Aurélie Baillot1,2, Warner M Mampuya3, Isabelle J Dionne4, Emilie Comeau5, Anne Méziat-Burdin5, Marie-France Langlois6. 1. Nursing Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada. 2. Research Institute of the Montfort Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 4. Research Centre on Aging, Health and Social Services Centre, Institute of Geriatrics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 5. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. 6. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Research Center of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada. Marie-France.Langlois@USherbrooke.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experts recommend physical activity (PA) to optimize bariatric surgery (BS) results. However, evidence on the effect of PA before BS is missing. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of adding a Pre-Surgical Exercise Training (PreSET) to an interdisciplinary lifestyle intervention on physical fitness, quality of life, PA barriers, and anthropometric parameters of subjects awaiting BS. METHODS:Thirty candidates for BS (43.2 ± 9.2 years, 47.5 ± 8.1 kg/m2) have been randomized in two groups: one group following the PreSET (endurance and strength training) and another receiving usual care. Before and after 12 weeks, we assessed physical fitness with a battery of tests (symptom-limited exercise test, 6-min walk test (6MWT), sit-to-stand test, half-squat test, and arm curl test), quality of life with the laval questionnaire, and PA barriers with the physical exercise belief questionnaire. RESULTS: One control group subject abandoned the study. Subjects in the PreSET group participated in 60.0 % of the supervised exercise sessions proposed. Results showed significant improvements in the 6MWT (17.4 ± 27.2 vs. -16.4 ± 42.4 m; p = 0.03), half-squat test (17.1 ± 17.9 vs. -0.9 ± 14.5 s; p = 0.05), arm curl repetitions (4.8 ± 2.3 vs. 1.0 ± 4.1; p = 0.01), social interaction score (10.7 ± 12.5 vs. -2.1 ± 11.0 %; p = 0.02), and embarrassment (-15.6 ± 10.2 vs. -3.1 ± 17.8 %; p = 0.02) in completers (n = 8) compared to the non-completers (n = 21). No significant difference between groups in BMI and other outcomes studied was observed after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a PreSET to an individual lifestyle counselling intervention improved physical fitness, social interactions, and embarrassment. Post-surgery data would be interesting to confirm these benefits on the long term.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Experts recommend physical activity (PA) to optimize bariatric surgery (BS) results. However, evidence on the effect of PA before BS is missing. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of adding a Pre-Surgical Exercise Training (PreSET) to an interdisciplinary lifestyle intervention on physical fitness, quality of life, PA barriers, and anthropometric parameters of subjects awaiting BS. METHODS: Thirty candidates for BS (43.2 ± 9.2 years, 47.5 ± 8.1 kg/m2) have been randomized in two groups: one group following the PreSET (endurance and strength training) and another receiving usual care. Before and after 12 weeks, we assessed physical fitness with a battery of tests (symptom-limited exercise test, 6-min walk test (6MWT), sit-to-stand test, half-squat test, and arm curl test), quality of life with the laval questionnaire, and PA barriers with the physical exercise belief questionnaire. RESULTS: One control group subject abandoned the study. Subjects in the PreSET group participated in 60.0 % of the supervised exercise sessions proposed. Results showed significant improvements in the 6MWT (17.4 ± 27.2 vs. -16.4 ± 42.4 m; p = 0.03), half-squat test (17.1 ± 17.9 vs. -0.9 ± 14.5 s; p = 0.05), arm curl repetitions (4.8 ± 2.3 vs. 1.0 ± 4.1; p = 0.01), social interaction score (10.7 ± 12.5 vs. -2.1 ± 11.0 %; p = 0.02), and embarrassment (-15.6 ± 10.2 vs. -3.1 ± 17.8 %; p = 0.02) in completers (n = 8) compared to the non-completers (n = 21). No significant difference between groups in BMI and other outcomes studied was observed after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a PreSET to an individual lifestyle counselling intervention improved physical fitness, social interactions, and embarrassment. Post-surgery data would be interesting to confirm these benefits on the long term.
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery; Physical activity; Physical fitness; Quality of life; Severe obesity
Authors: P J Hennis; P M Meale; R A Hurst; A F O'Doherty; J Otto; M Kuper; N Harper; P A Sufi; D Heath; H E Montgomery; M P W Grocott Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: A Baillot; M Audet; J P Baillargeon; I J Dionne; L Valiquette; M M Rosa-Fortin; C N Abou Chakra; E Comeau; M F Langlois Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jill A Kanaley; Sheri R Colberg; Matthew H Corcoran; Steven K Malin; Nancy R Rodriguez; Carlos J Crespo; John P Kirwan; Juleen R Zierath Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Georgi Vassilev; Till Hasenberg; Johannes Krammer; Peter Kienle; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch; Mirko Otto Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Nicole M Gilbertson; Andrew S Paisley; Sibylle Kranz; Arthur Weltman; Jennifer L Kirby; Peter T Hallowell; Steven K Malin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Jonathan Sivakumar; Lynn Chong; Salena Ward; Tom R Sutherland; Matthew Read; Michael W Hii Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.129