Literature DB >> 23619260

Impact of creatinine values on MELD scores in male and female candidates for liver transplantation.

Guilherme Mariante-Neto1, Caroline P Marroni, Alfeude Medeiros Fleck Junior, Cláudio Augusto Marroni, Maria Lúcia Zanotelli, Guido Cantisani, Ajácio B M Brandão.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A systematic bias against women, resulting from the use of creatinine as a measure of renal function, has been identified in Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based liver allocation. Correction of this bias by calculation of female creatinine levels using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula has been suggested.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 639 cirrhotic candidates for first-time liver transplantation was studied. Creatinine levels were corrected for gender using the MDRD formula. The accuracy of MELD, with or without creatinine correction, to predict 3-and 6-month mortality after inclusion in a transplant waiting list was estimated.
RESULTS: Women exhibited significantly lower creatinine levels, glomerular filtration rate, and MELD scores than men. After creatinine correction, female MELD scores had a mean increase of 1.1 points. Creatinine correction yielded an increase of 3 points in the MELD score in 15.2% of patients, 2 points in 22.4%, and 1 point in 17.6% of patients. The likelihood of death at 3 and 6 months after enrollment in the transplant waiting list was similar in males and females and the likelihood of receiving a transplant, as assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, was also similar in males and females.
CONCLUSION: The survival or the likelihood of receiving a transplant while on the waiting list were similar in men and women in both pre- and post-MELD eras and creatinine correction did not increase the accuracy of the MELD score in estimating 3- and 6-month mortality in female candidates for liver transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23619260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hepatol        ISSN: 1665-2681            Impact factor:   2.400


  5 in total

Review 1.  Female gender in the setting of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Kryssia Isabel Rodríguez-Castro; Eleonora De Martin; Martina Gambato; Silvia Lazzaro; Erica Villa; Patrizia Burra
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24

2.  Gender-Specific Differences in Baseline, Peak, and Delta Serum Creatinine: The NACSELD Experience.

Authors:  Jacqueline G O'Leary; Florence Wong; K Rajender Reddy; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Patrick S Kamath; Scott W Biggins; Michael B Fallon; Ram M Subramanian; B Maliakkal; Leroy Thacker; Jasmohan S Bajaj
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Nosocomial infections in female compared with male patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Marie Griemsmann; Tammo L Tergast; Nicolas Simon; Abdul-Rahman Kabbani; Michael P Manns; Heiner Wedemeyer; Markus Cornberg; Benjamin Maasoumy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Sex Differences in Portopulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Hilary M DuBrock; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Richard N Channick; Steven M Kawut; Michael J Krowka
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Correcting the sex disparity in MELD-Na.

Authors:  Nicholas L Wood; Douglas VanDerwerken; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.369

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.