Literature DB >> 23618754

Metal ion levels in total hip arthroplasty versus hip resurfacing.

Alicia J Johnson1, Michel J Le Duff, James P Yoon, Mariam Al-Hamad, Harlan C Amstutz.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the tapered interface between stem and femoral head may be a substantial source of cobalt and chromium ion release after metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study compared patient ion levels after MOM hip resurfacing (HR) and MOM THA performed with identical acetabular components. 110 HRs were compared with 22 THAs. All had well-oriented components, unilateral implants, and serum ion studies beyond one year post-operatively. The HR group's median cobalt value was 1.11 μg/L vs. 2.86 μg/L for the THA patients. The HR group's median chromium value was 1.49 μg/L vs. 2.94 μg/L for THA. Significantly higher THA ion levels suggest a source of ions other than the MOM bearing itself.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; hip; metal ions; metal-on-metal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23618754     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Metal ion levels comparison: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing vs total hip arthroplasty in patients requiring revision surgery.

Authors:  Syed S Ahmed; Rajesh Bawale; Sunil Jain; Srinivas Samsani
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-28

2.  Comparison of metal ion levels in patients with hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig W Forsthoefel; Nicholas M Brown; Mark L Barba
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-31

3.  Does Surface Topography Play a Role in Taper Damage in Head-neck Modular Junctions?

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Deborah J Hall; Nguyen Q Ha; Robert M Urban; Brett R Levine; Joshua J Jacobs; Hannah J Lundberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 5.  Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  G Neupane; R Madhusudhan; A Shrestha; R Vaishya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Comparison of the long-term cause of failure and survivorship of four hundred and twenty seven metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: resurfacing versus large head total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michele Palazzuolo; Alexander Antoniadis; Leilani Delaune; Inès Tornare; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.