Literature DB >> 23617917

Female promiscuity is positively associated with neutral and selected genetic diversity in passerine birds.

Jostein Gohli1, Jarl A Anmarkrud, Arild Johnsen, Oddmund Kleven, Thomas Borge, Jan T Lifjeld.   

Abstract

Passerine birds show large interspecific variation in extrapair paternity rates. There is accumulating evidence that such promiscuous behavior is driven by indirect, genetic benefits to females. Sexual selection theory distinguishes between two types of genetic benefits, additive and nonadditive effects, mediated by preferences for good and compatible genes, respectively. Good genes preferences should imply directional selection and mating skew among males, and thus reduced genetic diversity in the population. In contrast, compatible genes preferences should give balancing selection that retains genetic diversity. Here, we test how well these predictions fit with patterns of variation in genetic diversity and promiscuity levels among passerine birds. We found that more promiscuous species had higher nucleotide diversity at autosomal introns, but not at Z-chromosome introns. We also found that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class IIB alleles had higher sequence diversity, and therefore should recognize a broader spectrum of pathogens, in more promiscuous species. Our results suggest that female promiscuity targets a multitude of autosomal genes for their nonadditive, compatibility benefits. Also, as immunity genes seem to be of particular importance, we hypothesize that interspecific variation in female promiscuity among passerine birds has arisen in response to the strength of pathogen-mediated selection.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617917     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Sexual selection explains more functional variation in the mammalian major histocompatibility complex than parasitism.

Authors:  J C Winternitz; S G Minchey; L Z Garamszegi; S Huang; P R Stephens; S Altizer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Spatial patterns of extra-pair paternity in a waterbird colony: separating the effects of nesting density and nest site location.

Authors:  Piotr Minias; Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas; Robert Rutkowski; Krzysztof Kaczmarek; Tomasz Janiszewski
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Genotyping strategy matters when analyzing hypervariable major histocompatibility complex-Experience from a passerine bird.

Authors:  Silje L Rekdal; Jarl Andreas Anmarkrud; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds.

Authors:  Jan T Lifjeld; Jostein Gohli; Tomáš Albrecht; Eduardo Garcia-Del-Rey; Lars Erik Johannessen; Oddmund Kleven; Petter Z Marki; Taiwo C Omotoriogun; Melissah Rowe; Arild Johnsen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Endless forms of sexual selection.

Authors:  Willow R Lindsay; Staffan Andersson; Badreddine Bererhi; Jacob Höglund; Arild Johnsen; Charlotta Kvarnemo; Erica H Leder; Jan T Lifjeld; Calum E Ninnes; Mats Olsson; Geoff A Parker; Tommaso Pizzari; Anna Qvarnström; Rebecca J Safran; Ola Svensson; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Multiple paternity does not depend on male genetic diversity.

Authors:  Kerstin E Thonhauser; Shirley Raveh; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Structural equation modeling as a tool to investigate correlates of extra-pair paternity in birds.

Authors:  Nicholas M A Crouch; Roberta J Mason-Gamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Study of Faster-Z Evolution in the Great Tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Kai Hayes; Henry J Barton; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.