Literature DB >> 23617906

From beavis to beak color: a simulation study to examine how much qtl mapping can reveal about the genetic architecture of quantitative traits.

Jon Slate1.   

Abstract

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping is frequently used in evolutionary studies to understand the genetic architecture of continuously varying traits. The majority of studies have been conducted in specially created crosses, in which genetic differences between parental lines are identified by linkage analysis. Detecting QTL segregating within populations is more problematic, especially in wild populations, because these populations typically have complicated and unbalanced multigenerational pedigrees. However, QTL mapping can still be conducted in such populations using a variance components mixed model approach, and the advent of appropriate statistical frameworks and better genotyping methods mean that the approach is gaining popularity. In this study it is shown that all studies described to date report evidence of QTL of major effect on trait variation, but that these findings are probably caused by inflated estimates of QTL effect sizes due to the Beavis effect. Using simulations I show that even the most powerful studies conducted to date are likely to give misleading descriptions of the genetic architecture of a trait. I show that an interpretation of a mapping study of beak color in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), that suggested genetic variation was determined by a small number of loci of large effect, which are possibly maintained by antagonistic pleiotropy, is likely to be incorrect. More generally, recommendations are made to how QTL mapping can be combined with other approaches to provide more accurate descriptions of a trait's genetic architecture.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617906     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  29 in total

Review 1.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  The genetic architecture of sexually selected traits in two natural populations of Drosophila montana.

Authors:  P Veltsos; E Gregson; B Morrissey; J Slate; A Hoikkala; R K Butlin; M G Ritchie
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  Population genetics of sexual conflict in the genomic era.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Mapping the adaptive landscape of a major agricultural pathogen reveals evolutionary constraints across heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Anik Dutta; Fanny E Hartmann; Carolina Sardinha Francisco; Bruce A McDonald; Daniel Croll
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 5.  Genomic tools for behavioural ecologists to understand repeatable individual differences in behaviour.

Authors:  Sarah E Bengston; Romain A Dahan; Zoe Donaldson; Steven M Phelps; Kees van Oers; Andrew Sih; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 19.100

6.  Heterogeneity of genetic architecture of body size traits in a free-living population.

Authors:  Camillo Bérénos; Philip A Ellis; Jill G Pilkington; S Hong Lee; Jake Gratten; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 7.  Towards the identification of the loci of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Camilo Salazar; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.781

8.  Genome-wide association mapping in a wild avian population identifies a link between genetic and phenotypic variation in a life-history trait.

Authors:  Arild Husby; Takeshi Kawakami; Lars Rönnegård; Linnéa Smeds; Hans Ellegren; Anna Qvarnström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Identifying the genes underlying quantitative traits: a rationale for the QTN programme.

Authors:  Young Wha Lee; Billie A Gould; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.276

10.  Phenotypic variation in infants, not adults, reflects genotypic variation among chimpanzees and bonobos.

Authors:  Naoki Morimoto; Marcia S Ponce de León; Christoph P E Zollikofer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.