OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of an unenhanced MR angiography sequence (Syngo Native Space, Siemens Healthcare) to detect and quantify lower-limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients known to have lower-limb arteriopathy were included in this prospective study. For every patient, we performed Native sequence and CE-MRA on a 1.5-T system. We evaluated examination duration, image quality, and location, number, and severity of lesions. RESULTS: Examination duration was longer for Native sequence (mean, 39.6 min, vs 10 min for CE-MRA). Image quality was significantly better for CE-MRA, with 92% of images listed as good to excellent for CE-MRA, compared to 53% for Native. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of Native were respectively 75%, 95%, 89%, and 88% for all mixed levels; 52%, 97%, 88%, and 87% for aortoiliac level; 87%, 99%, 95%, and 92% for femoropopliteal level; and 82%, 87%, 87%, and 85% for subpopliteal level. If we considered only patients with Leriche and Fontaine stage II arteriopathy, Native results were slightly better, with respective specificities and NPVs of 96% and 91% for all mixed levels; 98% and 90% for aortoiliac level; 98% and 93% for femoropopliteal level; and 91% and 90% for subpopliteal level. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced MR angiography, cheaper than CE-MRA, showed in our study a good NPV, which suggests its utility as first-line test to screen for PAD, especially in patients at risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of an unenhanced MR angiography sequence (Syngo Native Space, Siemens Healthcare) to detect and quantify lower-limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) as the reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients known to have lower-limb arteriopathy were included in this prospective study. For every patient, we performed Native sequence and CE-MRA on a 1.5-T system. We evaluated examination duration, image quality, and location, number, and severity of lesions. RESULTS: Examination duration was longer for Native sequence (mean, 39.6 min, vs 10 min for CE-MRA). Image quality was significantly better for CE-MRA, with 92% of images listed as good to excellent for CE-MRA, compared to 53% for Native. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of Native were respectively 75%, 95%, 89%, and 88% for all mixed levels; 52%, 97%, 88%, and 87% for aortoiliac level; 87%, 99%, 95%, and 92% for femoropopliteal level; and 82%, 87%, 87%, and 85% for subpopliteal level. If we considered only patients with Leriche and Fontaine stage II arteriopathy, Native results were slightly better, with respective specificities and NPVs of 96% and 91% for all mixed levels; 98% and 90% for aortoiliac level; 98% and 93% for femoropopliteal level; and 91% and 90% for subpopliteal level. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced MR angiography, cheaper than CE-MRA, showed in our study a good NPV, which suggests its utility as first-line test to screen for PAD, especially in patients at risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
Authors: Hakan Demirtaş; Tuna Parpar; Bumin Değirmenci; Mustafa Kara; Ahmet Orhan Çelik; Ayşe Umul; Mustafa Kayan; Ömer Yılmaz Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 3.469