Literature DB >> 23617489

Segmental enhancement inversion of small renal oncocytoma: differences in prevalence according to tumor size.

Sungmin Woo1, Jeong Yeon Cho, Seung Hyup Kim, Sang Youn Kim, Hak Jong Lee, Sung Il Hwang, Min Hoan Moon, Chang Kyu Sung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the prevalence of segmental enhancement inversion of small renal oncocytomas according to tumor size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients (19 men, 14 women; mean age, 61 years; range, 40-74 years) with 33 oncocytomas diagnosed at surgical resection who had undergone contrast-enhanced biphasic CT between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. CT scans were analyzed by two radiologists blinded to the specifics of the pathology report for size, presence of segmental enhancement inversion, enhancement pattern, and homogeneity. Segmental enhancement inversion was present when a renal mass was divided into two differently enhanced segments in the corticomedullary phase (30-40 seconds after contrast injection) with the degree of enhancement reversed in the nephrographic phase (120-180 seconds after contrast injection). The masses were further assessed for fibrous septa, cystic change, hemorrhage, and necrosis. For statistical analysis, the Pearson chi-square test and linear regression were used to evaluate the relation between the prevalence of segmental enhancement inversion and tumor size or pathologic changes.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of 33 renal oncocytomas was 2.65 cm (range, 0.8-4.8 cm). There was no significant linear trend according to size (p = 0.762), although segmental enhancement inversion was significantly (p = 0.006) more common (10/12) in tumors measuring 1.5-2.9 cm. Pathologic change was present in 14 oncocytomas. There was no significant linear trend according to size (p = 0.068), but 2.5-cm and larger tumors had a significantly higher prevalence (57.9%) (p = 0.036). Segmental enhancement inversion was more common (13/19) in tumors without pathologic change (p = 0.024).
CONCLUSION: Segmental enhancement inversion was a characteristic finding in our series of small renal oncocytomas and was more common in tumors measuring 1.5-2.9 cm. Pathologic changes such as central scar were more common in oncocytomas larger than 2.5 cm and may be related to the low occurrence of segmental enhancement inversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617489     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma using biphasic computed tomography (CT) and multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Maali Al-Subhi; Trevor A Flood; Mohammed El-Khodary; Matthew D F McInnes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Guan Huang; Winnie Fu; Zaahir Moloo; Safwat Girgis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of segmental enhancement inversion for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma at biphasic contrast enhanced CT: systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Matthew D F McInnes; Lilly Cao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The role of imaging in the active surveillance of small renal masses.

Authors:  P G K Wagstaff; P J Zondervan; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Imaging management of incidentally detected small renal masses.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Spindle cell oncocytoma of the sella turcica with anaplastic features and rapid progression in short-term follow-up: a case report with proposal of distinctive radiologic features.

Authors:  Dong Ja Kim; SangHan Lee; Mee-Seon Kim; Jeong-Hyun Hwang; Myong Hun Hahm
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  Imaging spectrum of renal oncocytomas: a pictorial review with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Kousei Ishigami; Aaron R Jones; Laila Dahmoush; Leandro V Leite; Marius G Pakalniskis; Thomas J Barloon
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-12-14

Review 8.  Imaging findings of common benign renal tumors in the era of small renal masses: differential diagnosis from small renal cell carcinoma: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Jeong Yeon Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Small Renal Masses without Gross Fat: What Is the Role of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT?

Authors:  Gerta Repeckaite; Kristina Zviniene; Justina Jankauskiene; Algidas Basevicius; Daimantas Milonas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.