We investigated the effect of surface sulfate formation on the structure and spectroscopic properties of MgO nanocubes using X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, several spectroscopic techniques, and ab initio calculations. After CS2 adsorption and oxidative treatment at elevated temperatures the MgO particles remain cubic and retain their average size of ∼6 nm. Their low coordinated surface elements (corners and edges) were found to bind sulfite and sulfate groups even after annealing up to 1173 K. The absence of MgO corner specific photoluminescence emission bands at 3.4 and 3.2 eV substantiates that sulfur modifies the electronic properties of characteristic surface structures, which we attribute to the formation of (SO3)2- and (SO4)2- groups at corners and edges. Ab initio calculations support these conclusions and provide insight into the local atomic structures and spectroscopic properties of these groups.
We investigated the effect of surface sulfate formation on the structure and spectroscopic properties of MgO nanocubes using X-ray diffraction, electron microscopy, several spectroscopic techniques, and ab initio calculations. After CS2 adsorption and oxidative treatment at elevated temperatures the MgO particles remain cubic and retain their average size of ∼6 nm. Their low coordinated surface elements (corners and edges) were found to bind sulfite and sulfate groups even after annealing up to 1173 K. The absence of MgO corner specific photoluminescence emission bands at 3.4 and 3.2 eV substantiates that sulfur modifies the electronic properties of characteristic surface structures, which we attribute to the formation of (SO3)2- and (SO4)2- groups at corners and edges. Ab initio calculations support these conclusions and provide insight into the local atomic structures and spectroscopic properties of these groups.
Oxides with pronounced
surface basicity, such as those of the alkaline
earth metals, are utilized as adsorbents for the removal of acidic
gases from combustion emission.[1] Moreover,
sulfur oxides and carbonyl sulfides (COS) are abundant aerosols in
the troposphere where they participate in many heterogeneous reactions.
For these reasons, their interaction with mineral oxides has received
great attention in environmental science and technology.[2−5] From the perspective of the synthesis and functionalization of nanomaterials,
a lot of effort is directed at the controlled modification of oxide
surfaces via decoration of selected surface elements with atoms and
molecules. Surface adsorbates can induce local electronic structure
changes and give rise to interesting new functionalities. The corresponding
adjustment of surface reactivity[6] and surface
optical properties[7−10] requires understanding of the underlying adsorption processes.[11] In a recent study by Scarano et al.,[12] the interaction of CS2 with polycrystallineMgO was comprehensively explored using FT-IR and UV–Vis spectroscopies
in combination with ab initio electronic structure calculations. The
authors addressed the reactivity of low coordinated (LC) surface elements,
such as corners and kinks toward CS2. As a major result,
they found that CS2 adsorption transforms the reactive
polycrystalline material into a chemically inert system. Surface anions
located on MgO edges and corners react with CS2 in a way
that is similar to that found for CO2 activation:[13−15]Adsorbed [OCS2]2–, [OCOS]2–, and [OCO2]2– moieties exhibit multidentate
binding modes. In addition to the FT-IR study which addressed the
reaction steps described in eqs 1 and 2 at room temperature, it was found that [OCS2]2– and [OCOS]2– species
decompose above room temperature and, in the course of this process,
S2– ions substitute low coordinated O2– sites.[12] Using electron paramagnetic
resonance spectroscopy (EPR) Livraghi
et al.[5] studied CS2 interaction
with electron-rich MgO surfaces and identified CS2– as anionic radicals together with paramagnetic sulfur
S– oligomers (with n = 1 and ≥3) of limited thermal stability. Thus,
after annealing in vacuum the overall chemical reaction between adsorbed
CS2 molecules and MgO surfaces is expected to lead to S-doped
MgO surfaces, MgO(S):The exchange
of ions between nanostructured
surfaces and those originating from gas phase molecules[14,15] carry high potential for surface functionalization. We are interested
in exploiting these reactions in order to modify MgO nanocubes. These
exhibit a high concentration of low index (001) facets that are framed
by 4-fold coordinated (4C) ions at edges and 3-fold coordinated ions
(3C) at corners.[16,7] A variety of spectroscopic techniques[17−21] as well as first-principles theoretical calculations[22−26] have been used to characterize the electronic properties of related
particle powders. UV diffuse reflectance spectroscopy reveals two
absorption bands below the bulk absorption threshold of MgO, which
are attributed to corner (4.6 eV) and edge sites (5.2 eV). Photoluminescence
(PL) spectroscopy detects two closely spaced emission bands at 3.4
and 3.2 eV, which result from photoexcitation of edges and corners,
respectively.[17,27,28] Thus, MgO nanocubes represent a well characterized model system
that is useful to explore adsorption and ion exchange reactions at
particle surfaces. Corresponding insights may be transferable to those
obtained on single crystalline model surfaces investigated under ultrahigh
vacuum.[29−34]In the present study, we explored the possibility of exchanging
surface O2– in MgO nanocubes with S2– via CS2 adsorption and investigated the thermal stability
and spectroscopic properties of the resulting species. Different from
sample treatment procedures in non oxidizing atmospheres where neutral
and anionic sulfur species prevail,[5,12] we applied
CS2 adsorption in combination with high temperature oxidation
and subsequent vacuum annealing. The activation procedure was chosen
to address the impact of thermally stable adsorbates on the surface
electronic structure. Our main conclusion is that sulfites [SO3]2– and sulfates [SO4]2– form in the process of the surface treatment and remain dominating
surface groups on MgO nanocube after annealing to 1173 K.
Methods
Nanocrystal Synthesis and CS2 Adsorption
For the production of MgO nanoparticles, we use a chemical vapor
synthesis (CVS) procedure corresponding to the controlled evaporation
and subsequent oxidation of alkaline earth metals under reduced pressure.[35] Stable processing conditions are provided by
spatially separating the evaporation and oxidation zones. The reactor
system employed consists of two quartz glass tubes, which are placed
inside a cylindrical furnace. The inner tube hosts ceramic ships with
Mg grains (99.98%, Aldrich), which are heated to 913 K to ensure a
sufficiently high metal vapor pressure. An inert argon stream transports
the metal vapor away from the evaporation zone to the end of the inner
glass tube where the metal vapor meets the oxidizing agent coming
from the outer glass tube. The exothermic oxidation reaction leads
to a bright stable flame in the oxidation zone of the reactor and
MgO nanoparticles are formed as a result of homogeneous nucleation
in the gas phase. Because of continuous pumping, the residence time
of nuclei within the flame is <2 ms, which prevents substantial
coarsening and coalescence. A bypass system ensures nanoparticle collection
only during the time of controlled process conditions (i.e., temperature,
pressure, and flow rate). The total pressure in the CVS-reactor is
kept constant at 50 ± 3 mbar over the entire production process.
After production, the MgO nanoparticles powder is transferred into
quartz glass cells, which allows one to perform thermal activation
of the nanoparticle powders in defined gas atmospheres. To obtain
well-defined cubic MgO nanoparticles, the organic contamination of
the as-obtained MgO powder is removed by heating to 1123 K at a rate
of 5 K·min–1 and exposing to molecular oxygen
(10 mbar) at this temperature. Then, the sample temperature is raised
to 1173 K at pressures p < 5 × 10–6 mbar and kept at this temperature for 1 h.Scheme illustrating the
set up for MgO nanocubes annealing and
subsequent CS2 adsorption at room temperature.Prior to adsorption of CS2 on MgO nanocubes,
the CS2 is cleaned employing the freeze–pump–thaw
method.
The adsorption experiments are carried out at a base pressure of 3×
10–5mbar using the setup shown in Figure 1. In a typical experiment MgO nanocubes are exposed
to a partial pressure of 60 mbar CS2 for a typical exposure
time of 10 s.[36] Then, the powder inside
the quartz glass cuvette is evacuated to p < 5
× 10–6 mbar and subjected to a procedure that
is identical to that applied to the as-obtained powder. The structural
and optical properties of the as-treated sample (hereafter called
MgO:SO) are compared to those of pure
MgO nanocubes.
Figure 1
Scheme illustrating the
set up for MgO nanocubes annealing and
subsequent CS2 adsorption at room temperature.
Structure and Morphology
X-ray diffraction
patterns were collected on a PANalytical X’Pert PRO diffractometer
using Cu Kα radiation. The average nanocrystal sizes
were derived on the basis of the Scherrer equation with the assumption
of cubically shaped nanocrystals. We used pseudo-Voigt functions to
determine the full width at half-maximum of the three main reflexes
to calculate an average nanocrystal size (dXRD). Small amounts of the metal oxide powders were cast on a holey
carbon grid for investigation with a TECNAI F20 analytical TEM equipped
with a field emission gun and a S-twin objective lens.
Spectroscopy
X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer
Φ5600ci spectrometer using standard Al radiation (1486.6 eV)
working at 300 W. Prior to the measurements, MgO and MgO:SO powder samples, which had been subjected to vacuum
annealing and oxygen treatment at elevated temperatures as described
above, were transferred to the XPS spectrometer system in dedicated
vacuum cells. The vacuum of the cells was broken immediately before
sample introduction into the XPS analytical chamber. Exposure of the
samples to air for approximately 30 min between breaking the vacuum
of the cell, sample mounting and its transfer into the load lock was
inevitable. The working pressure of the XPS system was p < 5 × 10–9 mbar. The spectrometer was
calibrated by assuming the binding energy (BE) of the Au4f7/2 line at 83.9 eV with respect to the Fermi level. The standard deviation
for the binding energy values was 0.15 eV. The reported binding energies
were corrected for charging effects with respect to the 1s line of
carbon, which has a BE of 284.6 eV.[37,38] Survey scans
(187.85 pass energy, 1 eV/step, 25 ms per step) were obtained in the
0–1300 eV range. Detailed scans (58.7 eV pass energy, 1 eV/step,
25 ms per step) were recorded for the O1s, C1s, Mg2p, Mg1s, MgKLL,
S2p, and S2s regions. Peak assignments were carried out using the
values reported in the Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy(37) and in the NIST XPS database,[39] as well as in the quoted references.The
IR experiments were performed in a cell that allows for sample activation
at high-vacuum conditions with a base pressure below 5 × 10–6 mbar. Samples in the form of hand-pressed, self-supporting
pellets were measured in the IR transmission mode with a Bruker 113v
spectrometer. A total of 300 scans were accumulated for one spectrum
to obtain a reasonable signal-to-noise ratio with a spectral resolution
of 3 cm–1.Photoluminescence and UV diffuse
reflectance measurements were
carried out at room temperature; the samples were contained within
the quartz glass cells that guarantee vacuum conditions better than p = 5 × 10–6 mbar. UV diffuse reflectance
spectra were acquired using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 750 spectrophotometer
equipped with an integrating sphere and then converted to absorption
spectra by the Kubelka–Munk transform procedure. Diffuse reflectance
measurements were carried out in the presence of 10 mbar O2 to quench potential surface photoluminescence emission effects,
which would generate false positive deviations from the true reflectance
values. Photoluminescence spectra were measured on an Edinburgh Instruments
spectrometer system FSP920 using a CW 450 W Xenon arc lamp for excitation.
The basic architecture of an Edinburgh Instruments spectrometer has
the emission and excitation arms orientated around the sample chamber
in an L-geometry. The spectrometer is equipped with a double monochromator
on the emission and excitation side to guarantee optimal stray light
rejection.
Theoretical Modeling
The experimental
data were supported by ab initio calculations carried out using an
embedded cluster approach. In brief, an MgO nanoparticle was modeled
by a cube of 20 × 20 × 20 atoms terminated with (001) atomic
planes. An oxygen-terminated corner of this particle was modeled quantum-mechanically
(QM) using a Mg13O13 cluster embedded in the
potential produced by the remaining part of the nanoparticle, which
was represented using the classical shell model. The cations at the
interface between the QM and the shell model regions were represented
using the full ion potentials.[40] Formal
ionic charges were used. The details of this method are described
elsewhere.[41,42] Oxygen and Mg atoms of the QM
cluster were represented using 6-311G* basis sets. The QM contribution
to the total energy were calculated using the hybrid density functional
B3LYP,[43,44] as implemented in the Gaussian 03 package.[45] The excitation energies (ε) and the corresponding
oscillator strengths (f) were calculated using the
time-dependent DFT method[46] and the B3LYP
density functional. The optical absorption spectra were then simulated
as a convolution of functions g(ε) = f × exp[(ε –
ε)2/a2] (n = 1–35) for the lowest-energy
transitions. The constant a was selected so that
the full width at half of the maximum of g(ε)
was 0.2 eV. Vibrational frequencies were calculated by numerically
differentiating the total energy with respect to the coordinates of
selected atoms.
Results and Discussion
CS2 adsorption
on MgO nanocubes and subsequent high temperature treatment
do neither affect the cubic morphology specific to the MgO nanocubes
nor their average particle size (Figure 2a
and b). XRD confirms that both powders, MgO and MgO:SO, crystallize in the cubic rocksalt phase (Figure 2c). XRD reflections related to magnesium–sulfur
compounds such asMgS, MgSO3, and MgSO4 were
not observed. Using the Scherrer equation, the average crystallite
size was estimated from reflex broadening in XRD powder patterns.[47,48] Domain sizes of 6.5 nm ±1.0 nm were derived for MgO and MgO:SO nanocube powders.
Figure 2
TEM images of MgO:SO powders after
oxidation (a) and vacuum annealing at 1173 K (b), demonstrating that
the cubic morphology is retained. (c) XRD powder patterns of MgO and
MgO:SO reveal that both powders crystallize
in the cubic rock salt phase.
TEM images of MgO:SO powders after
oxidation (a) and vacuum annealing at 1173 K (b), demonstrating that
the cubic morphology is retained. (c) XRD powder patterns of MgO and
MgO:SO reveal that both powders crystallize
in the cubic rocksalt phase.
Surface Composition
The surface composition
of the samples was analyzed by XPS. The XPS survey spectrum of a MgO:SO sample (Figure 3a)
reveals the presence of Mg and O, whereas the additional presence
of carbon is attributed to surface organic contaminations because
of the sample exposure to the atmosphere in the time interval between
breaking the vacuum of the transfer cell, sample mounting and transfer
into the load lock of the XPS system (t ≈
30 min). A survey spectrum of MgO nanocubes (not shown) without prior
contact with CS2 revealed identical signals related to
Mg, O, and C with comparable peak intensities. Because of its low
concentration, sulfur could be evidenced only by selected area scans
covering the S2p region (155–175 eV). Exclusively in the case
of the MgO:SO sample, a significant spectral
feature with a binding energy of about 169 eV was observed (Figure 3b). We attribute this feature to sulfur in a positive
oxidation state, such as in sulfite (SO32–) and sulfate (SO42–) groups, reported
in the literature to peak in the energy ranges 165.6–167.0
and 168.0–170.1 eV, respectively.[37,49,13] The broadening of the peak (FWHM of about
5 eV) hints at the presence of sulfur in slightly different chemical
environments, for instance to the copresence of sulfite and sulfate
anions. No characteristic XPS features ascribable to sulfide ions
(S2–)[37] have been found
in the binding energy range between 160.0 and 162.5 eV (Figure 3b), which are typical of sulfide species. The presence
of pure CS2, whose S2p region would be characterized by
a binding energy of 163.6 eV could also be ruled out.[37] Taken together, our results suggest that the process of
CS2 adsorption on MgO nanocubes followed by subsequent
oxidation and vacuum annealing yields sulfite (SO3)2– or sulfate (SO4)2– surface
groups rather than S2–, which would substitute surface
oxygen anions. No sulfur specific XPS signal was observed for pure,
that is, untreated with sulfur MgO nanocubes (spectrum not shown),
as expected.
Figure 3
XPS survey spectrum (a) and selected area spectrum of
the S2p region
(b) of MgO:SO powders, which were obtained
after oxidation and vacuum annealing of MgO nanoparticles with adsorbed
CS2.
XPS survey spectrum (a) and selected area spectrum of
the S2p region
(b) of MgO:SO powders, which were obtained
after oxidation and vacuum annealing of MgO nanoparticles with adsorbed
CS2.
Prediction
of Surface Structures
To get further insights into the relative
stability of S-containing
surface species and associated structures, we performed ab initio
calculations of SO surface species. It
was assumed that high temperature oxidation eliminates all carbon
that would originate from CS2 adsorption. Because of the
presence of oxygen at elevated temperatures, we expect that surface
SO species acquire as much oxygenas
required to maximize their thermodynamic stability. Finally, for the
sake of simplicity, we only considered isolated sulfur species at
low coordinated surface sites, which are known to be most reactive.
To this end, we defined a reference configuration, in which an S atom
occupies a surface O site and then considered the variety of the structures
formed by addition of N/2 oxygen molecules. The lowest-energy
configurations for N = 0–4 are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Geometrical configurations of SO complexes
at the 3-coordinated (top) and 4-coordinated (bottom) surface sites
of MgO nanocubes. Oxygen, magnesium, and sulfur atoms are shown using
small (blue), medium (yellow), and large (red) spheres, respectively.
Energy changes are calculated with respect to 1/2 of the O2 molecule.
Geometrical configurations of SO complexes
at the 3-coordinated (top) and 4-coordinated (bottom) surface sites
of MgO nanocubes. Oxygen, magnesium, and sulfur atoms are shown using
small (blue), medium (yellow), and large (red) spheres, respectively.
Energy changes are calculated with respect to 1/2 of the O2 molecule.The top panel shows the
structures originating from a reference
configuration, in which an S atom occupies a 3-coordinated oxygen
site. The values of the energy gain associated with the addition of
1/2 O2 for each N suggest that substitutional S atoms can
exist as transient species in an oxygen-poor atmosphere only. Once
oxygen is supplied, the local atomic structure of the corner site
changes so as oxidation state of the S atom increases from −2
(N = 0) to +6 (N = 4). Each change
of the oxidation state can be associated with either (i) consecutive
attachment of O atoms or (ii) dissociation of an O2 molecules
and attachment of the two O atoms simultaneously. The latter is possible
if the energy gain because of attachment of two O atoms exceeds the
dissociation energy of the O2 molecule (∼4.8 eV).
This is, indeed, the case for N = 1 → N = 3 and N = 2 → N = 4 transitions. However, it is not the case for N = 3. Taking into account that, according to earlier studies,[50] MgO surface binds O atoms with the energy of
as high as 1.8 eV, oxygen atoms are unlikely to be readily available.
Therefore, configurations with N = 3 and a sulfur
oxidation state below +6 can remain stable even in the presence of
O2. Configurations of SO complexes
near 4-coordinated sites are shown in the bottom panel of Figure 4. Their local atomic structures are similar to those
found for the 3-coordinated site, with the exception of N = 3, where the local structure of SO is determined by the site symmetry. Interestingly, the energy gain
due to attachment of a single O atom is comparable to the binding
energy of a neutral O atom at the surface and only the N = 2 → N = 4 transition is thermodynamically
feasible with respect to splitting of an O2 molecule. This
suggests that (SO4)2– at the 4-coordinated
site can be formed only if the precursor state is formed by an SO2 molecule displacing an edge O atom. However, given that these
SO configurations are less stable than
those near an oxygen corner, we expect that the relative weight of
the SO at the edges is insignificant.
FT-IR Spectroscopy
Fourier transform
infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy is particularly well suited to study
sulfur containing surface adsorbates on alkaline earth oxides[17,51] and was employed to complement respective XPS measurements. After
annealing and high temperature oxidation, the spectral range between
1000 and 1350 cm–1 in the transmission FT-IR spectra
of MgO and MgO:SO nanocube powders exhibit
significant differences (Figure 5a). The MgO:SO sample exhibits three intense absorption
bands at 1003, 1062, and 1326 cm–1 (Figure 5c). Absorptions of lower intensity are observed
at 1052, 1086, and 1309 cm–1. Both samples show
IR absorption bands at 3720 and 3707 cm–1 (Figure 5b). These are attributed to isolated hydroxyl groups
which result from incomplete surface dehydroxylation.[52] It was demonstrated in a recent study[24] that hydroxyl groups absorbing in this wavenumber range
can be linked to photoluminescence emission features around 2.9 eV
(see also below). Identical positions of the OH stretching vibrations
and their comparable intensities indicate that CS2 adsorption
on MgO followed by vacuum annealing and high temperature oxidation
affects neither the nature nor the abundance of surface hydroxyls
of highest thermal stability.[24]
Figure 5
Transmission
FT-IR spectra of MgO and MgO:SO nanocube
powders. Wavenumber ranges from (a) 4000 to 800 cm–1, (b) 3800 to 3600 cm–1 specific
for hydroxyl groups on MgO, and (c) 1400 to 800 cm–1, a region where absorption bands of (SO)2– groups are expected, are shown. The spectra
were acquired at room temperature and at a base pressure better than
10–5 mbar.
Transmission
FT-IR spectra of MgO and MgO:SO nanocube
powders. Wavenumber ranges from (a) 4000 to 800 cm–1, (b) 3800 to 3600 cm–1 specific
for hydroxyl groups on MgO, and (c) 1400 to 800 cm–1, a region where absorption bands of (SO)2– groups are expected, are shown. The spectra
were acquired at room temperature and at a base pressure better than
10–5 mbar.The infrared absorption band associated with CS2 molecules
in the gas phase are reported to be at 1533 cm–1. Upon physisorption, it shifts to 1525 cm–1.[12] Chemisorbed [OCS2]2– and [OCOS]2– species absorb at 1125–1025
and 1480 cm–1, respectively, and decompose above
room temperature.[12] The IR absorptions
in the range 1000–1350 cm–1 (Figure 5c) are attributed to SO species which remain chemisorbed at MgO nanocubes surfaces (Figure 5c) and exhibit enhanced thermal stability. This
is consistent with earlier studies of the interaction of SO2 with transition metals[53] and metal oxides,[1,3,54−57] as well as that of (SO4)2– with metal cations in solution.[58] Schoonheydt et al.[59] and Schneider et al.[60] investigated infrared
absorption properties of SO2 adsorbed on MgO. Absorption
bands in the region 950–1400 cm–1 (Figure 5c) are attributed to sulfite (SO3)2– and sulfate (SO4)2– groups.
Because of similar IR band positions for both types of adsorbates
with their mono- or multidentate bonding character a clear and unambiguous
discrimination between them is impossible on the basis of the experimental
data presented.[55] The presence of sulfur
in a positive oxidation state, however, was confirmed with XPS and
is further strengthened by FT-IR spectroscopy.The assignment
of the IR features is corroborated by our ab initio
calculations. Vibrational frequencies associated with the SO species have been determined for the most stable
configurations found for each of the oxidation states of the S species
(see Figure 4). In each case, the dynamics
matrix has been constructed using numerical differentiation of the
total energy with respect to the Cartesian coordinates of the S atoms
and their nearest O atom neighbors. The results of these calculations
are summarized in Figure 6. In the case of
the S2– oxidation state, no vibrational frequencies
above 700 cm–1 has been detected. As the sulfur
oxidation state increases, higher frequency bands appear at ∼850
cm–1 for S2+ and ∼950 cm–1 for S4+. However, vibrational modes with frequencies
exceeding 1000 cm–1, observed experimentally (see
Figure 5c), appear only in the case of the
S6+ oxidation states, which reinforces our conclusions
that surface sulfur species have positive oxidation states. However,
this does not rule out the possibility that a minor contribution of
only partially oxidized sulfur species such as S4+ in SO3 groups can be present at the surface as well.
Figure 6
Vibrational spectra (left)
and the corresponding local atomic structures
(right, see also Figure 4) calculated for the
most stable configurations of the surface corner SO species for the sulfur oxidation state varying from −2
to +6. The two top spectra are for the most stable (top) and the second
most stable (2nd from the top) configurations of [SO4]2–.
Vibrational spectra (left)
and the corresponding local atomic structures
(right, see also Figure 4) calculated for the
most stable configurations of the surface corner SO species for the sulfur oxidation state varying from −2
to +6. The two top spectra are for the most stable (top) and the second
most stable (2nd from the top) configurations of [SO4]2–.
Optical
Properties
Since changes
in the UV diffuse reflectance of powders of MgO nanocubes are indicative
of chemical transformations of the surface elements having the lowest
coordination number, we employed this technique to explore the surface
electronic structure of MgO:SO powders
(Figure 7a). For MgO nanocubes absorption bands
at 4.6, 5.2, and 5.8 eV correspond to charge transfer excitations
at corners, edges, and terrace elements (Figure 6, gray curve).[16,61] For MgO:SO powders, the structure of the absorption spectrum is changed
(Figure 7a, gray curve) and reveals new bands
at 4.0, 5.0, and 5.8 eV.
Figure 7
(a) UV diffuse reflectance spectra of MgO and
MgO:SO nanocubes powders. Measurements
were carried out
in oxygen atmosphere (p = 10 mbar O2)
and at T = 298 K. (b) Calculated optical absorption
spectra.
(a) UV diffuse reflectance spectra of MgO and
MgO:SO nanocubes powders. Measurements
were carried out
in oxygen atmosphere (p = 10 mbar O2)
and at T = 298 K. (b) Calculated optical absorption
spectra.The low-energy parts of the optical
absorption spectra, calculated
for the O3C-terminated MgO corner and for the most stable
[SO3]2– and [SO4]2– species at this corner, are shown in Figure 7b. In all three cases, these parts of the spectra are attributed
to the transitions between several highest occupied states (the highest
one being HOMO) of the MgO valence band (VB) and a single lowest unoccupied
state (LUMO), some of which are shown in Figure 8. It is clear that the adsorption features found in pure MgO in the
range of 3.7–5.0 eV vanish upon formation of the sulfites and
sulfates and, instead, two characteristic peaks at ∼5.3 and
∼5.9 eV appear. The 5.3 eV peak is associated with the VB states
dominated by the 2p atomic states of the O4C atoms that
are perpendicular to the (001) edges of the nanocubes (see Figure 8e–g), while the peak at 5.9 eV is dominated
by the 2p states that are parallel either to these edges or to (001)
atomic planes.
Figure 8
Molecular orbitals involved into the lowest energy optical
transitions
at MgO corners terminated with: an O2– ion (a–d)
and [SO4]2– molecular ion (e–h).
Sulfur oxide moieties are expected to determine
the electronic
transitions associated with O2- anions in different
surface elements. While previous work tentatively assigned the absorption
band around 4.2 eV to a charge transfer excitation, which involves
S2– and Mg2+ in 4-fold coordinated sites,[12] we have to rule out such an assignment for the
present case since our XPS results reveal clearly the absence of S2– containing surface elements (Figure 3).Analysis of the molecular orbitals (MOs) involved
in the lowest-energy
optical transitions reveals how formation of the corner (SO4)2– complexes affects the electronic structure
of the MgO nanoparticles and, therefore, their optical properties.
We highlight two main effects. First, the three highest occupied MOs
(shown in Figure 8a–c), which are dominated
by the O3C ions in pure MgO, are eliminated once the corner
[SO4]2– complex is formed. Consequently,
the highest occupied MOs are associated with the O4C ions
next to the corner site (see Figure 8e–g).
Second, the lowest unoccupied MO, which is dominated by the Mg4C ions immediately next to the O3C site in pure
MgO (see Figure 8d), is so strongly perturbed
by the [SO4]2– complex, that it effectively
disappears and the LUMO becomes dominated by the 5-coordinated Mg
ions [Figure 8h]. Both of these effects lead
to the larger HOMO–LUMO gap in the sulfur-treated MgO and the
shift of the lowest optical features, as shown in Figure 7b. We note that this modification of the optical
absorption spectrum is different from that reported earlier for the
protonated MgO nanocubes.[24] While protons
bound to the O3C ions do eliminate the 2p contribution
of these oxygens to the top of the valence band, they also shift the
LUMO state to the lower energies and, thus, leave the HOMO–LUMO
gap almost unaffected.Molecular orbitals involved into the lowest energy optical
transitions
at MgO corners terminated with: an O2– ion (a–d)
and [SO4]2– molecular ion (e–h).The PL emission spectrum of MgO
nanocubes shows two closely spaced
emission bands at hνEM = 3.2 eV and hνEM = 3.4 eV, which result from the excitation of oxygen-terminated
corners (O3C2-, hνEXC = 4.6 eV) and surface O4C2- anions
in edges (hνEXC = 5.2 eV), respectively (Figure 9, black curves).[27] For
MgO:SO samples, however, profound changes
in the PL emission properties are observed (Figure 9, gray curves). Only significantly less intense emission features
at 2.8 and 2.5 eV are observed upon excitation of MgO nanocube edges
(hνEXC = 5.2 eV) and corners (hνEXC = 4.6 eV), respectively (Figure 9, gray curves).
These emission features are attributed to changes in the surface electronic
structure that results from residual surface hydroxyls, which, in
turn, were observed by FT-IR spectroscopy (Figure 5c).[24] From the composite PL spectra
in Figure 9, we, however, conclude that the
majority of relevant PL emission sites are dehydroxylated and give
either rise to the PL emission features with maxima at 3.2 and 3.4
eV (MgO, black lines), or not (MgO:SOx, gray lines).
Figure 9
Photoluminescence emission
spectra of MgO nanocubes and MgO:SO powders
using energies of (a) hν =
5.2 eV and (b) hν = 4.6 eV to excite four-coordinated surface
O4C2– anions in edges and oxygen-terminated
corners in pure MgO. Measurements are carried out at T = 298 K and p < 5 × 10–6 mbar.
Photoluminescence emission
spectra of MgO nanocubes and MgO:SO powders
using energies of (a) hν =
5.2 eV and (b) hν = 4.6 eV to excite four-coordinated surface
O4C2– anions in edges and oxygen-terminated
corners in pure MgO. Measurements are carried out at T = 298 K and p < 5 × 10–6 mbar.The absence of the emission bands
at hν = 3.2 and 3.4 eV
is in line with observed changes in the UV diffuse reflectance spectra.
Thus, surface sulfites and sulfates effectively extinguish MgO specific
PL emissions related to the radiative deactivation of surface excitons
at unperturbed corners.[28] Moreover, since
all emission bands observed on MgO and MgO:SO nanocube powders are perfectly quenched by gaseous oxygen,
we conclude that corresponding excitation and subsequent radiative
deactivation processes originate exclusively from the surface excited
states. This evidence provides strong support for the conclusion that
MgO nanocube corners were functionalized with surface SO species.The results presented here advance
our understanding of sulfuroxide adsorption on mineral surfaces,[1,3,62] as well as suggest strategies that aim at the control
over surface acidity of metal oxide catalysts via sulfatation.[63] Due to a variety of potential applications
for highly dispersed alkaline earth oxides with intrinsic and extrinsic
surface functionalities it is necessary to further develop our research
on structure–property relationships. Moreover, related insights
are indispensable for the knowledge-based functionalization of metaloxide nanoparticle powders in general. Surface sulfur oxides are promising
anchor groups for coupling reactions[64] that
may link metal oxide nanocubes to other objects, such as nanoparticles,
two-dimensional substrates, and porous hosts. We believe that the
here presented approach provides a well-defined starting point for
inte gration of nanoscale building blocks into higher order assemblies.
The opportunity to track the underlying transformation process with
different spectroscopic techniques in conjunction with ab initio calculations
provides a firm base for future control over the optolectronic properties.
Summary
Structure, morphology, and surface
optical properties of MgO nanocubes
with surface sulfites and sulfates were studied experimentally and
using ab initio calculations. XRD and TEM reveal that the rocksalt
structure and the cubic particle morphology of MgO nanocubes remain
unaltered upon CS2 adsorption and subsequent oxidation
and vacuum annealing. XPS and IR spectroscopy results point to the
fact that following this sample treatment MgO surfaces become decorated
with (SO3)2– or (SO4)2– groups that are thermally stable up to 1173 K. Respective
surface decorations are associated with profound changes in the UV
diffuse reflectance properties. In addition, the extinction of MgO
specific photoluminescence properties which can be interrogated by
excitation of edges (hνEXC = 5.2 eV) and corners
(hνEXC = 4.6 eV) clearly shows that the surface sites
involved in excitation–emission processes on pure MgO are completely
modified by sulfur-containing groups.
Authors: Mario Chiesa; Maria Cristina Paganini; Elio Giamello; Cristiana Di Valentin; Gianfranco Pacchioni Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Marie-Laurence Bailly; Guylène Costentin; Hélène Lauron-Pernot; Jean Marc Krafft; Michel Che Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2005-02-17 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Slavica Stankic; Martin Sterrer; Peter Hofmann; Johannes Bernardi; Oliver Diwald; Erich Knözinger Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Keith P McKenna; David Koller; Andreas Sternig; Nicolas Siedl; Niranjan Govind; Peter V Sushko; Oliver Diwald Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 15.881