Literature DB >> 23616484

Predictors of 30-day mortality and outcome in cases of myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock treated by extracorporeal life support.

Pierre Demondion1, Ludovic Fournel, Jean-Louis Golmard, Michaela Niculescu, Alain Pavie, Pascal Leprince.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The twin aims of this study were to identify the independent predictors of 30-day mortality and to analyse the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) associated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and necessitating extracorporeal life support (ECLS).
METHODS: The investigation was a single-centre, retrospective study of 77 patients who required ECLS for AMI with CS. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent variables associated with 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Between February 2006 and November 2009, 745 patients in our establishment received ECLS. In the single-centre cohort, we retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who had required ECLS support for AMI with CS. The delay between AMI and CS ECLS was 15 ± 4 h. PCI was performed in 58 patients (75.3%) and isolated emergency CABG in 12 (15.6%). The remaining 7 patients (9.1%) did not undergo revascularization. ECLS duration averaged 9.8 ± 7.1 days. Nineteen patients were successfully weaned from ECLS (24%). Fifty-eight patients did not undergo or did not tolerate the weaning trial (76%). Forty patients died during ECLS support, 13 were implanted with a mono-ventricular (n = 9) or biventricular assist device (n = 4) and 5 were bridged to heart transplantation. Complications consisted primarily in pneumonia (51.3%) and acute renal failure requiring haemofiltration (46.1%). Pulmonary oedema occurred in 24 patients (31.6%) and major bleeding in 16 (21.33%). 30-day and in-hospital survival rates were, respectively, 38.9 and 33.8%. Multivariable analysis identified preimplantation lactate serum level, preimplantation creatinine serum level and previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation as independent predictors of 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Prompt ECLS support is an effective strategy and provides a reasonable chance of survival in patients with AMI associated with profound CS. As shown in our results pertaining to predictive risk factors for 30-day mortality, reducing the duration of end-organ ischaemia is the keystone to management of this patient population. A major remaining challenge will consist in preventing pulmonary oedema following peripheral ECLS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Extracorporeal life support

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616484     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  14 in total

1.  Escalation of therapy without evidence: a "may" does not imply a "should"!

Authors:  M Heringlake; B Bein; M Buerke; D Damjanovic; H Ebelt; H V Groesdonk; A Markewitz; M Möckel; R Moosdorf; K Pilarczyk; D A Reuter; M Sander; A Schmitt; G Trummer; S Treskatsch; M Von der Brelie; B Zante; A Zarbock; N Haake
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Physiology of the Assisted Circulation in Cardiogenic Shock: A State-of-the-Art Perspective.

Authors:  Julien Guihaire; Francois Haddad; Mita Hoppenfeld; Myriam Amsallem; Jeffrey W Christle; Clark Owyang; Khizer Shaikh; Joe L Hsu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Data From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya; Brian C Gulack; Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon; James E Davies; Xia He; J Matthew Brennan; Vinod H Thourani; Matthew L Williams
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Early Blood Pressure Variables Associated With Improved Outcomes in VA-ECLS: The ELSO Registry Analysis.

Authors:  Aniket S Rali; Sagar Ranka; Amy Butcher; Zubair Shah; Joseph E Tonna; Marc M Anders; Marshal D Brinkley; Hasan Siddiqi; Lynn Punnoose; Mark Wigger; Suzanne B Sacks; Dawn Pedrotty; Henry Ooi; Matthew D Bacchetta; Jordan Hoffman; William McMaster; Keki Balsara; Ashish S Shah; Jonathan N Menachem; Kelly H Schlendorf; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Sandip K Zalawadiya
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 12.544

Review 5.  The ABCDE approach to difficult weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Christiaan L Meuwese; Daniel Brodie; Dirk W Donker
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 19.334

6.  Evidence-based Management of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Karl Werdan; Martin Russ; Michael Buerke; Roland Prondzinsky; Sebastian Dietz
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-08

Review 7.  Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: part 1-Adult patients.

Authors:  Roberto Lorusso; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Khalid Alenizy; Niels Sluijpers; Maged Makhoul; Daniel Brodie; Mike McMullan; I-Wen Wang; Paolo Meani; Graeme MacLaren; Mariusz Kowalewski; Heidi Dalton; Ryan Barbaro; Xiaotong Hou; Nicholas Cavarocchi; Yih-Sharng Chen; Ravi Thiagarajan; Peta Alexander; Bahaaldin Alsoufi; Christian A Bermudez; Ashish S Shah; Jonathan Haft; David A D'Alessandro; Udo Boeken; Glenn J R Whitman
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Early Prediction of 3-month Survival of Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest on Extracorporeal Life Support.

Authors:  Clément Delmas; Jean-Marie Conil; Simon Sztajnic; Bernard Georges; Caroline Biendel; Camille Dambrin; Michel Galinier; Vincent Minville; Olivier Fourcade; Stein Silva; Bertrand Marcheix
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 9.  Overview of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Adamantios Tsangaris; Tamas Alexy; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Andrea Elliott; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-07

10.  Individualized real-time clinical decision support to monitor cardiac loading during venoarterial ECMO.

Authors:  Michael Broomé; Dirk W Donker
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.