Literature DB >> 23616367

Defining a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer and its implications for adjuvant treatment.

J R O'Neill1, N A Stephens, V Save, H M Kamel, H A Phillips, P J Driscoll, S Paterson-Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been associated with a poorer prognosis in oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional (OGJ) cancer. The College of American Pathologists defines the CRM as positive if tumour cells are present at the margin, whereas the Royal College of Pathologists also include tumour cells within 1 mm of this margin. The relevance of these differences is not clear and no study has investigated the impact of adjuvant therapy. The aim was to identify the optimal definition of an involved CRM in patients undergoing resection for oesophageal or OGJ cancer, and to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy improved survival in patients with an involved CRM.
METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study of patients who had undergone attempted curative resection for a pathological T3 oesophageal or OGJ cancer. Clinicopathological variables and distance from the tumour to the CRM, measured to ± 0.1 mm, were correlated with survival.
RESULTS: A total of 226 patients were included. Sex (P = 0·018), tumour differentiation (P = 0·019), lymph node status (P < 0·001), number of positive nodes (P < 0·001), and CRM distance (P = 0·042) were independently predictive of prognosis. No significant survival difference was observed between positive CRM 0-mm and 0·1-0·9-mm groups after controlling for other prognostic variables. Both groups had poorer survival than matched patients with a CRM at least 1 mm clear of tumour cells. Among patients with a positive CRM of less than 1 mm, those undergoing observation alone had a median survival of 18·6 months, whereas survival was a median of 10 months longer in patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy, but otherwise matched for prognostic variables (P = 0·009).
CONCLUSION: A positive CRM of 1 mm or less should be regarded as involved. Adjuvant radiotherapy confers a significant survival benefit in selected patients with an involved CRM.
© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616367     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  10 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection of esophageal carcinoma].

Authors:  I Gockel; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Minimising recurrence after primary femoral hernia repair; is mesh mandatory?

Authors:  D R Clyde; A de Beaux; B Tulloh; J R O'Neill
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Yuqian Hu; Liwei Xu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  Adjuvant radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer with positive circumferential resection margins-recurrence and survival outcomes.

Authors:  Bhamini Vadhwana; Dimitrios Zosimas; Panagis M Lykoudis; Huan Ming Phen; Maria Martinou; Thangadorai Amalesh; David Khoo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-06

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of immunohistochemical prognostic biomarkers in resected oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  L H McCormick Matthews; F Noble; J Tod; E Jaynes; S Harris; J N Primrose; C Ottensmeier; G J Thomas; T J Underwood
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Loss of SRY-box2 (SOX2) expression and its impact on survival of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  F J C Ten Kate; S H van Olphen; M J Bruno; B P L Wijnhoven; J J B van Lanschot; L H J Looijenga; R C Fitzgerald; K Biermann
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Patients unfit for neoadjuvant therapy may still undergo resection of locally advanced esophageal or esophagogastric junctional cancer with acceptable oncological results.

Authors:  J Robert O'Neill; Ewan D Kennedy; Vicki Save; Barbara Langdale-Brown; Lucy Wall; Richard J E Skipworth; Simon Paterson-Brown
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol (N Y)       Date:  2017-01-13

8.  Quantitative Shotgun Proteomics Unveils Candidate Novel Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC)-specific Proteins.

Authors:  J Robert O'Neill; Hui-Song Pak; Erola Pairo-Castineira; Vicki Save; Simon Paterson-Brown; Rudolf Nenutil; Bořivoj Vojtěšek; Ian Overton; Alex Scherl; Ted R Hupp
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Meta-analysis of the influence of a positive circumferential resection margin in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  R Evans; J R Bundred; P Kaur; J Hodson; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-06-25

10.  Impact of incremental circumferential resection margin distance on overall survival and recurrence in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  W R C Knight; J Zylstra; W Wulaningsih; M Van Hemelrijck; D Landau; N Maisey; A Gaya; C R Baker; J A Gossage; J Largergren; A R Davies
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-04-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.