BACKGROUND: A systematic preoperative evaluation to determine the individual resection strategy in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) was assessed as to its clinical value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 75 patients with CRLM who were scheduled for surgery were prospectively included and received an additional preoperative systematic evaluation in the presence of a hepatobiliary radiologist and the hepatobiliary surgeon scheduled to perform the surgery. The following items were assessed in a standardized manner: lesion detection and characterization, presence of extrahepatic disease, vascular anatomy, and resection strategy. Intraoperative findings and histopathological results were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Five out of 75 patients were not considered to be eligible for surgery due to additional findings, such as additional metastases or extrahepatic disease. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of individual CRLM were 80.9% (95% CI 75.7-86.1%) and 69.1% (95% CI 59.1-79.1%), respectively. Radical resections were performed in 87.1%. There was one futile laparotomy (1.4%). CONCLUSION: In patients with colorectal liver metastases, standardized preoperative work-up, with subsequent planning of an individualized resection in a jointed meeting of a hepatobiliary radiologist and the surgeon who will perform the operation, leads to a high level of radical resections and a low number of futile laparotomies.
BACKGROUND: A systematic preoperative evaluation to determine the individual resection strategy in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) was assessed as to its clinical value. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 75 patients with CRLM who were scheduled for surgery were prospectively included and received an additional preoperative systematic evaluation in the presence of a hepatobiliary radiologist and the hepatobiliary surgeon scheduled to perform the surgery. The following items were assessed in a standardized manner: lesion detection and characterization, presence of extrahepatic disease, vascular anatomy, and resection strategy. Intraoperative findings and histopathological results were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Five out of 75 patients were not considered to be eligible for surgery due to additional findings, such as additional metastases or extrahepatic disease. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of individual CRLM were 80.9% (95% CI 75.7-86.1%) and 69.1% (95% CI 59.1-79.1%), respectively. Radical resections were performed in 87.1%. There was one futile laparotomy (1.4%). CONCLUSION: In patients with colorectal liver metastases, standardized preoperative work-up, with subsequent planning of an individualized resection in a jointed meeting of a hepatobiliary radiologist and the surgeon who will perform the operation, leads to a high level of radical resections and a low number of futile laparotomies.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Hee Chul Yu; Zhe Wu Jin; Guang Yu Jin; Heecheon You; Jang Il Moon; Jin Wook Chung; Shin Hwang; Baik Hwan Cho Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Dominique Elias; Gabriel Liberale; Déwi Vernerey; Marc Pocard; Michel Ducreux; Valérie Boige; David Malka; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Philippe Lasser Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: René Adam; Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Thomas A Aloia; Valérie Delvart; Daniel Azoulay; Henri Bismuth; Denis Castaing Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544