Literature DB >> 12093342

Genetic and histological assessment of surgical margins in resected liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: minimum surgical margins for successful resection.

Norihiro Kokudo1, Yoshio Miki, Sachiko Sugai, Akio Yanagisawa, Yo Kato, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Junji Yamamoto, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, Tetsuichiro Muto, Masatoshi Makuuchi.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: There have been few reports on the minimum surgical margins (SMs) required for successful liver resection in patients with colorectal metastases. This minimum requirement may be narrower than the previously recommended margin of 10 mm.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the minimum margins by assessing the presence of micrometastases around the tumor using genetic and histological techniques, and to investigate whether SMs are associated with patterns of tumor recurrence or patient survival.
DESIGN: Prospective and retrospective studies.
SETTING: Tertiary referral cancer center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent 62 liver resections for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer between December 1, 1996, and November 30, 2000, were included in the study. Tissue samples taken from the tumor, surrounding liver parenchyma, and Glisson pedicle near the tumor were tested for K-ras and p53 mutations using the mutant allele-specific amplification method. For the retrospective study on patient outcomes, 194 patients who had undergone liver resections between 1980 and 2000 were analyzed according to their SMs.
RESULTS: Of the 62 sets of samples from liver metastases, 39 were positive for K-ras and p53 gene mutations or both. Micrometastases in the liver parenchyma surrounding colorectal metastases were present in 2.0% (4/199) of tested samples and were located within 4 mm of the tumor border. Micrometastases via Glisson pedicle were more common (14.3% [3/21]), but these were also confined to a short distance from the tumor edge (</=5 mm). Of the 5 micrometastases detected by genetic analysis, only 2 were confirmed by histopathological examination. The analysis of patient outcomes demonstrated that the incidence of cut-end recurrence (relapse in the bed of resection) decreased from 20.0% to a range of 5.6% to 7.5% when the SM is 2 mm or more. The incidence of definite cut-end recurrence in patients with SMs less than 2 m, 2 to 4 mm, and 5 mm or wider was 13.3% (6/45), 2.8% (1/36), and 0% (0/102), respectively. The SM was not a significant prognostic factor in patient survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Micrometastases around liver tumors are not common, and most are confined to the immediate vicinity of the tumor border. We propose an SM of 2 mm as a clinically acceptable minimum requirement, which carries approximately a 6% risk of margin-related recurrence. Because liver resection provides the only chance of cure, complete removal of the tumor with a minimum margin is justified when technically unavoidable because of the size, location, number of tumors, or successive resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12093342     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  69 in total

1.  From Couinaud to molecular biology: the seven virtues of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Giuseppe Zimmitti; Junichi Shindoh
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Hepatic resection for colorectal metastases: the impact of surgical margin status on outcome.

Authors:  George A Poultsides; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Value of visual inspection, bimanual palpation, and intraoperative ultrasonography during hepatic resection for liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shojiro Hata; Hiroshi Imamura; Taku Aoki; Takuya Hashimoto; Masaaki Akahane; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yoshifumi Bekku; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Safety analysis of the oncological outcome after vein-preserving surgery for colorectal liver metastases detached from the main hepatic veins.

Authors:  Federico Tomassini; Italo Bonadio; Peter Smeets; Karen De Paepe; Giammauro Berardi; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Stéphanie Laurent; Louis J Libbrecht; Karen Geboes; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Treatment for multiple bilobar liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Shimada; Kuniya Tanaka; Kenichi Matsuo; Shinji Togo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Mithat Gonen; Kathleen Zazzali; Ronald P Dematteo; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases.

Authors:  Fernando A Alvarez; Rodrigo Sanchez Claria; Sebastian Oggero; Eduardo de Santibañes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

8.  Anatomical bi- and trisegmentectomies as alternatives to extensive liver resections.

Authors:  Elie Chouillard; Daniel Cherqui; Claude Tayar; Francesco Brunetti; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with peri-operative chemotherapy: oncological results of R1 resections.

Authors:  Clarisse Eveno; Mehdi Karoui; Etienne Gayat; Alain Luciani; Marie-Luce Auriault; Michael D Kluger; Isabelle Baumgaertner; Laurence Baranes; Alexis Laurent; Claude Tayar; Daniel Azoulay; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Patient tailored resection planning in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases; how and why should you do it?

Authors:  C S van Kessel; M S van Leeuwen; R van Hillegersberg; I H M Borel Rinkes; M A A J van den Bosch; I Q Molenaar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.