Literature DB >> 23614095

Long term outcomes of aortic root replacement: 18 years' experience.

Ji Hyun Bang1, Yu-Mi Im, Joon Bum Kim, Suk Jung Choo, Cheol Hyun Chung, Jae Won Lee, Sung-Ho Jung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the long-term outcomes of aortic root replacement at Asan Medical Center and investigated the predictors affecting mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 consecutive adult patients undergoing aortic root replacement with mechanical conduits (n=169), porcine aortic root prosthesis (n=23), or aortic homografts (n=33) from January 1992 to September 2009. The median follow-up duration was 6.1 years (range, 0 to 18.0 years).
RESULTS: The porcine root group was older than the other groups (freestyle 55.9±14.3 years vs. mechanical 46.3±14.6 years, homograft 48.1±14.7 years; p=0.02). The mechanical group had the highest incidence of the Marfan syndrome (mechanical 22%, freestyle 4%, homograft 3%; p=0.01). Surgery performed for infective endocarditis was more frequent in the homograft group (mechanical 10%, freestyle 10%, homograft 40%; p<0.001). The overall 30-day mortality was 5.3% (12/225). Actuarial survival rates in the mechanical, porcine root, and homograft groups were 79.4%, 81.5%, and 83.5% at 5 years and 67%, 61.9%, and 61.1% at 10 years, respectively (p=0.73). By multivariate analysis, preoperative diabetes mellitus, older age, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent predictors of mortality. Incidence of postoperative complications, including infective endocarditis and thromboembolism were comparable in all of the groups.
CONCLUSION: Aortic root replacement can be safely performed with different types of prostheses as the outcome was not affected by the choice of prosthesis. Further studies are required to assess the long-term durability of biological prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta, surgery; Aortic valve, surgery; Follow-up studies; Heart valve prosthesis

Year:  2013        PMID: 23614095      PMCID: PMC3631783          DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2013.46.2.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 2233-601X


  18 in total

1.  Biological vs. mechanical aortic root replacement.

Authors:  John G Byrne; Tomas Gudbjartsson; Alexandros N Karavas; Tomislav Mihaljevic; Bradley J Phillips; Sary F Aranki; James D Rawn; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.

Authors:  Kriengchai Prasongsukarn; W R Eric Jamieson; Samuel V Lichtenstein
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2005-07

3.  Surgical treatment of aneurysm and/or dissection of the ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch. Factors influencing survival in 717 patients.

Authors:  E S Crawford; L G Svensson; J S Coselli; H J Safi; K R Hess
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Operative management of Marfan syndrome: The Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  W A Baumgartner; D E Cameron; J M Redmond; P S Greene; V L Gott
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Valve-related events after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved aortic homografts.

Authors:  Abdullah Kaya; Marc A Schepens; Wim J Morshuis; Robin H Heijmen; Aart Brutel de la Riviere; Karl M Dossche
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Aortic root replacement with coronary button re-implantation: low risk and predictable outcome.

Authors:  S Westaby; T Katsumata; G Vaccari
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Reoperation in biological and mechanical valve populations: fate of the reoperative patient.

Authors:  G F Tyers; W R Jamieson; A I Munro; E Germann; L H Burr; R T Miyagishima; H Ling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults.

Authors:  Johanna J M Takkenberg; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Lex A van Herwerden; Ewout W Steyerberg; Mary M Lane; Ronald C Elkins; J Dik F Habbema; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Re-operation for bioprosthetic aortic structural failure - risk assessment.

Authors:  W R E Jamieson; L H Burr; R T Miyagishima; M T Janusz; G J Fradet; H Ling; S V Lichtenstein
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.

Authors:  P Bloomfield; D J Wheatley; R J Prescott; H C Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.