Literature DB >> 16116877

Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.

Kriengchai Prasongsukarn1, W R Eric Jamieson, Samuel V Lichtenstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The performance of bioprostheses (BP) and mechanical prostheses (MP) from valve-related composites of complications and combined major thromboembolism and hemorrhage were considered in order to facilitate decision-making for the patient age group of 61-70 years.
METHODS: The aortic valve replacement (AVR) population (BP, n = 619; MP, n = 303) was differentiated by age, concomitant coronary artery bypass, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and preoperative renal failure. The mitral valve replacement (MVR) population (BP, n = 353; MP, n = 312) was differentiated by valve type, age, concomitant coronary artery bypass, ejection fraction, NYHA and preoperative renal failure.
RESULTS: Actual freedom from reoperation for AVR was 92.1 +/- 1.5% for BP and 98.7 +/- 6.6% for MP, and for MVR was 74.5 +/- 2.6% for BP and 93.8 +/- 2.2% (12 years) for MP. Actual freedom from major thromboembolism and hemorrhage for AVR was 85.1 +/- 1.7% for BP and 76.9 +/- 3.6% for MP, and for MVR was 82.7 +/- 2.4% for BP and 76.7 +/- 3.8% (12 years) for MP. Linearized rates were undifferentiated for major thromboembolism. The hemorrhage rate for AVR-BP was 0.55%/pt-yr and for AVR-MP was 2.3%/pt-yr (p < 0.0001); for MVR-BP, the rate was 0.69%/pt-yr and for MVR-MP was 1.85%/pt-yr (p = 0.0011). The only predictor of AVR reoperation was age, and predictors for MVR reoperation were prosthesis type and follow up NYHA class. Predictors of AVR major thromboembolism and hemorrhage were prosthesis type, age, diabetes mellitus and COPD. There were no predictors of MVR major thromboembolism and hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: For the age group of 61-70 years, MP are recommended for MVR to protect from BP reoperation, whilst for AVR BP are recommended to protect from anticoagulant hemorrhage. Freedom from reoperation for AVR was undifferentiated for BP and MP at 12-15 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16116877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  7 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcome of Prosthetic Valve Replacement in Japanese Patients Aged 65 Years or Older: Are Guidelines for Prosthetic Valve Selection Based on Overseas Data Appropriate for Japanese Patients?

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Shunji Osaka; Hiroko Yaoita; Yusuke Ishii; Munehito Arimoto; Hiroaki Hata; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

2.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve in a developing country.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Choudhary; Sachin Talwar; Balram Airan
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2016-04-28

3.  Long term outcomes of aortic root replacement: 18 years' experience.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Bang; Yu-Mi Im; Joon Bum Kim; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee; Sung-Ho Jung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-09

4.  Choice of Aortic Valve Prosthesis in a Rapidly Aging and Long-Living Society.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Michio Yoshitake; Yoko Matsumura; Hitomi Naruse; Ko Bando; Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.520

5.  Risk-adjusted survival after tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: a 23-year assessment.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Gaca; Robert M Clare; J Scott Rankin; Mani A Daneshmand; Carmelo A Milano; G Chad Hughes; Walter G Wolfe; Donald D Glower; Peter K Smith
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2013-11

6.  Special report: 26-year durability of a bioprosthesis implanted in a 21-year-old patient.

Authors:  Torulv Holst; Josef Reichert; Peter Haldenwang; Vadim Moustafine; Matthias Bechtel; Justus Strauch; Stephan Knipp
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep       Date:  2014-02-27

Review 7.  Mechanical or biologic prostheses for mitral valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Yu; En Qiao; Wei Wang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 3.287

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.