Literature DB >> 23613777

Association of SNPs of CD40 gene with multiple sclerosis in Russians.

Ekaterina Alekseevna Sokolova1, Nadezhda Alekseevna Malkova, Denis Sergeevich Korobko, Aleksey Sergeevich Rozhdestvenskii, Anastasia Vladimirovna Kakulya, Elena Vladimirovna Khanokh, Roman Andreevich Delov, Fedor Alekseevich Platonov, Tatyana Yegorovna Popova, Elena Gennadievna Aref' eva, Natalia Nikolaevna Zagorskaya, Valentina Mikhailovna Alifirova, Marina Andreevna Titova, Inna Vadimovna Smagina, Svetlana Alksandrovna El' chaninova, Anna Valentinovna Popovtseva, Valery Pavlovich Puzyrev, Olga Georgievna Kulakova, Ekaterina Yur'evna Tsareva, Olga Olegovna Favorova, Sergei Gennadievich Shchur, Natalia Yurievna Lashch, Natalia Fyodorovna Popova, Ekaterina Valerievna Popova, Evgenii Ivanovich Gusev, Aleksey Nikolaevich Boyko, Yurii Sergeevich Aulchenko, Maxim Leonidovich Filipenko.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a serious, incurable neurological disease. In 2009, the ANZgene studies detected the suggestive association of located upstream of CD40 gene in chromosome 20q13 (p = 1.3×10(-7)). Identification of the causal variant(s) in the CD40 locus leads to a better understanding of the mechanism underlying the development of autoimmune pathologies. We determined the genotypes of rs6074022, rs1883832, rs1535045, and rs11086996 in patients with MS (n = 1684) and in the control group (n = 879). Two SNPs were significantly associated with MS: rs6074022 (additive model C allele OR = 1.27, 95% CI = [1.12-1.45], p = 3×10(-4)) and rs1883832 (additive model T allele OR = 1.20, 95% CI = [1.05-1.38], p = 7×10(-3)). In the meta-analysis of our results and the results of four previous studies, we obtain the association p-value of 2.34×10(-12), which confirmed the association between MS and rs6074022 at a genome-wide significant level. Next, we demonstrated that the model including rs6074022 only sufficiently described the association. From our analysis, we can speculate that the association between rs1883832 and MS was induced by LD, whereas rs6074022 was a marker in stronger LD with the functional variant or was the functional variant itself. Our results indicated that the functional variants were located in the upstream region of the gene CD40 and were in higher LD with rs6074022 than LD with rs1883832.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613777      PMCID: PMC3632563          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a serious, incurable neurological disease. The etiology of MS is linked to various genetic and environmental factors. Fifteen genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on MS have been conducted so far, and more than 50 loci have been identified [1]–[15]. The Australia and New Zealand Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (ANZgene) conducted a GWAS in 2009 and confirmed a number of previously reported associations. These associations include HLA-DR15 (p = 7.0×10−184), CD58 (p = 9.6×10−8), EVI5-RPL5 (p = 2.5×10−6), IL2RA (p = 7.4×10−6), CLEC16A (p = 1.1×10−4), IL7R (p = 1.3×10−3), and TYK2 (p = 3.5×10−3). The ANZgene study also detected the suggestive association of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located upstream of CD40 gene in chromosome 20q13 (rs6074022, p = 1.3×10−7; rs1569723, p = 2.9×10−7) [7]. An association between rs6074022 and MS was also identified in a GWAS based on a cohort from the United Kingdom [15]. However, in the meta-analysis reported in 2011, the association between SNP rs6074022 and MS did not reach the GWAS significance level (p = 4.91×10−6) [15]. Association with the CD40 gene region has been implicated in a number of human autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [16], rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [17], Crohn's disease [18], and Grave's disease [19]. The participation of CD40 in autoimmune processes is clearly demonstrated in experimental animal models. A non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse line is one of the most studied models of autoimmune diabetes. The disruption of CD40-CD40L interactions by antagonistic antibodies to CD40L prevents the development of diabetes in NOD mice, which confirms the critical function of the CD40-CD40L complex in the development of this disease [20]. In the mouse line K/BxN, RA spontaneously develops with many characteristics similar to the clinical course of RA in humans. CD40 knockout (K/BxN-CD40-/-) mice do not develop RA [21]. If a CIA mouse model of RA is treated with antagonistic antibodies such as CD40L mAb before the onset of collagen-induced arthritis, the mouse do not develop RA [22] or the disease decreases in severity [23]. However, if the therapy is started after the development of arthritis, no improvement occurs [25], [26]. CD40 contributes to the susceptibility to human autoimmune diseases, in which the B and T cell pathways play key roles. The role of CD40-CD40L interactions is identified in the development of type-1 diabetes. The CD40 signaling pathway induces the production of proinflammatory cytokines in the islet cells of primates and humans [24]. Increased expression of CD40L+ cells has been observed in the brains of patients with MS [25]. Also, the expression of CD40 in keratinocytes and endothelial cells in psoriatic plaques, as well as the increased expression of CD40L in the peripheral blood T cells [26], have been shown in patients with psoriatic arthritis. An elevated level of circulating CD40L has been found in patients with RA, SLE, and Sorgena syndrome during exacerbation [27]. In fact, the interaction between CD40 and CD40L triggers the immune response. The potential association of the CD40 region with MS is in accordance with the theory that MS has an autoimmune origin. Data from animal models also suggest similarities among the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of various immune disorders. Identification of the causal variant(s) in the CD40 locus will lead to a better understanding of the mechanism underlying the development of autoimmune pathologies. This study aimed to replicate a previously reported association of rs6074022 with MS in a Russian population and to study the association of MS with some other SNPs of the CD40 region.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Among a group of Russian-ethnicity patients with MS, 1684 people (1124 women and 560 men; mean age±SD = 36.7±11.2 years) were included based on the McDonald criteria for MS [28]. A total of 1176 patients had relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), 73 had primary progressive MS (PPMS), 403 had secondary-progressive MS (SPMS), and 32 patients had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). The following centers were involved in the recruitment of patients: Moscow Multiple Sclerosis Center at the City Hospital No. 11, n = 508; Omsk Regional Clinical Hospital, n = 305; State Budget Institution of Healthcare “Kemerovo Regional Clinical Hospital”, n = 224; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Siberian State Medical University, Federal Agency for Health and Social Development (Tomsk), n = 152; Territorial Clinical Hospital (Barnaul), n = 146; Novosibirsk Regional State Clinical Hospital, n = 248; and Republican Hospital No. 2 of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Sakha, n = 101. The control group included individuals (n = 879) without inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system living in Novosibirsk (n = 567), Barnaul (n = 118), Moscow (n = 112), Yakutsk (n = 60), and Omsk (n = 22). The group consisted of 346 men and 533 women (mean age±SD = 33.0±12.0 years). This study was approved by the ethics committees of all participating centers. All participants signed a written informed consent.

Selection of SNPs

The CD40 region has two blocks of linkage disequilibrium (LD) according to the result of the HapMap 3 panel for Utah residents of Northern and Western European descent and for Toscans in Italy (Fig. 1). In our study, we selected the following four SNPs: rs6074022 and rs1883832 from the first block of LD, rs11086998 from the second block, as well as rs1535045 from the space between the two blocks.
Figure 1

LD between the SNPs CD40 gene.

According to the result of the HapMap Project (v.3). union panel for Utah residents with Northern and Western European (CEU) and Toscans in Italy (TSI). SNPs from our study are shown in red frame.

LD between the SNPs CD40 gene.

According to the result of the HapMap Project (v.3). union panel for Utah residents with Northern and Western European (CEU) and Toscans in Italy (TSI). SNPs from our study are shown in red frame. The two SNPs previously associated with MS lie in the first block of LD. SNP rs6074022 T->C was associated with MS at a genome-wide suggestive level (p = 1.3×10−7) [7]. SNP rs1883832 C->T is located in the −1 position relative to the start of the transcription of CD40 gene. In previous candidate gene studies, the association of the minor allele T of SNP rs1883832 with a number of diseases has been examined. Such diseases include lymphoma [29], non-Hodgkins lymphoma [30], osteoporosis [31], multiple sclerosis [18], Crohn's disease [18], sporadic breast cancer [32], Behcet's syndrome [33], and rheumatoid arthritis [34]. In the second block, we selected SNP rs11086998 based on its potential function. The presence of minor G allele in rs11086998 leads to a proline-to-alanine substitution (P227A) in the intracellular region of CD40. The P227A site is 3 amino acid residues proximal to the TRAF6 binding site, and leds to increased TNF-α and IL-6 production in murine cell lines [35]. Notably, the rs11086998[G] allele has rather different frequencies in different ethnic groups, from 29% in Mexicans and South Americans to <2% in others. SNP rs1535045 was chosen to tag the gap between the two blocks of LD.

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from venous blood using standard procedures, including selection and lysis of blood cells, the hydrolysis of proteins with proteinase K, DNA purification by extraction with phenol-chloroform, and the DNA precipitated with ethanol. Genotyping of SNPs rs6074022, rs1883832, rs1535045 and rs11086996 was performed by TaqMan real-time PCR (ICBFM SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia).

Statistical data analysis

Tests for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were performed using the DeFinetti program available from the website of the Institute of Human Genetics (Munich, Germany; http://ihg2.helmholtz-muenchen.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl). Associations of genotype with the disease was studied using logistic regression analysis, as implemented in “glm” function of the R package for statistical analysis (www.r-project.org). The likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to test the statistical hypotheses and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to decide on “best model” describing the association of MS with SNPs. Meta-analysis and Q-test were carried out using the ‘rmeta' package for R (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmeta/rmeta.pdf). Haplotype analysis was carried out using the ‘haplo.stats' package for R (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/haplo.stats/haplo.stats.pdf). Results were considered statistically significant for all statistical calculations if P<0.05.

Results

We determined the genotypes of rs6074022, rs1883832, rs1535045, and rs11086996 in patients with MS and in the control group (Table 1). The call rate was≥99.9% for all SNPs. Five patients were excluded from further analysis because of missing data in at least one locus. Genotypic distribution did not significantly deviate from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium expectations for all four studied SNPs in the MS and control groups. The Q-test for heterogeneity of the minor allele frequency between sub-samples from different cities did not show significant differences (Table S1).
Table 1

Logistic regression association results for SNPs of CD40 gene with the development of MS.

SNPNumber ofrisk alleleRAFgenotypic model: OR [95% CI], p-value, AICadditive model: OR [95% CI], p-value, AICdominant model: OR [95% CI], p-value, AICrecessive model: OR [95% CI], p-value, AIC
ControlsCases
rs6074022T/T517865C0.24Reference 1.27 [1.121.45] p = 0.0003 1.34 [1.141.58] p = 0.0004 1.39 [1.011.93] p = 0.04
T/C307671 1.31 [1.101.55] p = 0.003
C/C55143 1.55 [1.122.16] p = 0.009
HWE0.300.43AIC = 3284.3 AIC = 3282.4 AIC = 3283.3 AIC = 3291.4
rs1883832C/C532927T0.22Reference 1.20 [1.051.38] p = 0.007 1.24 [1.051.47] p = 0.01 1.31 [0.93–1.85] p = 0.12
C/T299634 1.22 [1.021.45] p = 0.03
T/T481181.41 [0.99–2.01] p = 0.6
HWE0.480.50AIC = 3290.4 AIC = 3288.4 AIC = 3289 AIC = 3292.3
rs1535045C/C481957T0.26Reference0.96 [0.84–1.09] p = 0.520.91 [0.77–1.07] p = 0.271.10 [0.79–1.53] p = 0.57
C/T3426050.89 [0.78–1.06] p = 0.18
T/T561171.05 [0.75–1.47] p = 0.78
HWE0.640.11AIC = 3295.6AIC = 3295.3AIC = 3294.5AIC = 3295.4
rs11086996C/C8521640G0.02Reference0.75 [0.46–1.23] p = 0.260.91 [0.77–1.07] p = 0.26not applicable
C/G27390.75 [0.46–1.23] p = 0.26
G/G00not applicable
HWE0.640.63AIC = 3294.4AIC = 3294.4AIC = 3294.4not applicable

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; NA, not applicable; RAF, risk allele frequency in control group; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; HWE-p-value of exact test for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in groups; AIC–Akaike Information Criterion. Analysis was performed for four models: co-dominant, dominant, additive and recessive. Significant associations are shown in italic. The best model for each of significant associated SNPs is shown in bold.

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; NA, not applicable; RAF, risk allele frequency in control group; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; HWE-p-value of exact test for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in groups; AIC–Akaike Information Criterion. Analysis was performed for four models: co-dominant, dominant, additive and recessive. Significant associations are shown in italic. The best model for each of significant associated SNPs is shown in bold. Analysis of the associations of MS was performed using logistic regression under the additive, dominant, recessive, and genotypic (two degrees of freedom, 2df) models (Table 1). Two SNPs were significantly associated with MS: rs6074022 (additive model C allele OR = 1.27, 95% CI =  [1.12–1.45], p = 3×10−4) and rs1883832 (additive model T allele OR = 1.20, 95% CI = [1.05–1.38], p = 7×10−3). According to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) for each of these SNPs, the additive model was the best. Neither rs1535045 nor rs11086998 was associated with MS. Additionally, we performed stratified analysis to exclude a potential confounding by genetic substructure in our study. Sub-samples from each city were assigned a stratum in the stratified analysis (Figure S1). The summary OR, its 95% confidence interval, significant level, and p-level of heterogeneity are shown in Table S2 for each SNP. The results of stratified analysis were in accordance with the association analysis in the entire group. Despite the smaller sample size (the Kemerovo and Tomsk groups were excluded in the meta-analysis because they contained only cases), we observed in the joint analysis that rs6074022 (p = 0.02) and rs1883832 (p = 4×10−3) were associated with MS. The risk alleles were the same as those found in the association analysis in the entire group. We also analyzed the association of clinical sub-phenotypes of MS (RRMS, PPMS, SPMS, and CIS) with all SNPs (Table S3). After correction for multiple testing RRMS–the most common sub-type–was associated with rs6074022 (OR = 1.26, p = 0.0008) and with rs1883832 (OR = 1.24, p = 0.003). We performed a haplotype analysis for rs6074022 and rs1883832. The haplotype frequency, OR, its 95% confidence interval, and significant level are shown in Table 2. Two haplotypes were associated with MS: rs6074022[C]-rs1883832[C] (OR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.76–3.22, empirical p = 1.8×10−8) and rs6074022[T]-rs1883832[T] (OR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.79–4.02, empirical p = 1.7×10−6).
Table 2

Analysis of association between MS and haplotypes at SNPs rs6074022 and rs1883832.

Rs6074022Rs1883832Frequency in CasesFrequency in ControlSample frequencyOR95% C.I.Empirical p-value
TC0.6723910.7464050.698116reference
C* T* 0.2164650.2082930.2139491.191.03–1.380.02
TT* 0.0426180.0163940.0333142.681.79–4.021.7×10−6
C* C0.0685260.0289080.0546202.381.76–3.221.8×10−8

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Sample frequency–haplotype frequency in MS and control groups together; empirical p-value–p-value of association haplotype with MS;

-marked the risk allele from association analysis for each SNPs alone. Analysis was performed using logistic regression.

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Sample frequency–haplotype frequency in MS and control groups together; empirical p-value–p-value of association haplotype with MS; -marked the risk allele from association analysis for each SNPs alone. Analysis was performed using logistic regression. We estimated the LD between the studied SNPs of CD40 gene (Figure S2). Relatively high values of D′ were detected in all SNP pairs. However, the r 2 between SNPs was weak at <0.1, except for rs6074022-rs1883832 (r 2 = 0.59). We used the LRT to compare three models of association of rs6074022 and rs1883832 with MS: the general model (where we estimated the effects of genotypes of both SNPs rs1883832 and rs6074022) and two nested (effects estimated for only one SNP). According to the LRT, the nested model including rs6074022 only did not significantly differ from the more general model, including both SNPs rs6074022 and rs1883832 (p = 0.99), whereas the nested model including rs1883832 only was significantly worse than the general model (p = 0.01). The model including rs6074022 only was also the best according to the AIC (AIC = 3284.4, 3282.4, and 3288.4 for the general, rs6074022, and rs1883832 models, respectively). We conclude that the association of MS with the CD40 locus can be described in terms of the involvement of rs6074022 only. We also performed a meta-analysis of our results with previously published data on the association between rs6074022 and MS: GenMSA (NL), GenMSA (US), GenMSA (CH) [1], IMSGC (UK), IMSGC (US) [3], BWH/TT [2], and ANZgene [7]. Table 3 summarizes the results of previous studies used for this meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis (Figure 2), the total OR for all studies was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.10–1.23) with a statistical significance of p = 2.24×10−12. The heterogeneity test (Q-test) did not find significant differences between the studies (χ 2 (7) = 12.16, p = 0.10). These data confirmed the association of marker locus rs6074022 and MS at a level of significance accepted for GWASs.
Table 3

Meta-analysis of association between rs6074022 C allele and MS.

Study IDOR95% C.I.p-valueCase* Control* F:M ratioReference
IMSGC (UK)1.32[1.12–1.55]1×10−3 44929283.0∶1.0 [3]
IMSGC (US)1.16[0.96–1.42]0.1234116793.2∶1.0 [3]
GenMSA (CH)1.17[0.87–1.58]0.302512082.8∶1.0 [1]
GenMSA (NL)0.90[0.66–1.22]0.512252282.9∶1.0 [1]
GenMSA (US)1.26[1.01–1.56]0.044774253.1∶1.0 [1]
ANZgene1.20[1.12–1.28]1.3×10−7 161619872.6∶1.0 [7]
BWH/TT1.06[0.97–1.17]0.20218646892.6∶1.0 [2]
Russia1.27[1.12–1.45]0.000316798792.0∶1.5our study
Summary 1.16 [1.121.23] 2.2×10−12 7224 13023

Study ID: IMSGC (UK)–International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium United Kingdom; IMSGC (US)–International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium United States; GenMSA (CH)–Switzerland, Basel; GenMSA (NL)–The Netherlands, Amsterdam; GenMSA (US)–United States, San Francisco; ANZgene–Australia and New Zealand Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium; BWH/TT–Brigham & Woman's Hospital, Therapeutic Trials. F–female, M–male.

-Analyzed cases and controls per data set after quality control.

Results of our meta-analysis are shown in bold.

Figure 2

Meta-analysis of our results with previously published data on the association between rs6074022 and MS.

Abbreviation: GenMSA (NL), GenMSA (US), GenMSA (CH), IMSGC (UK), IMSGC (US), BWH/TT, and ANZgene. In the meta-analysis the total OR for all studies was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.10–1.23) with a statistical significance of p = 2.24×10−12. The heterogeneity test (Q-test) did not find significant differences between the studies (χ 2 (7) = 12.16, p = 0.10).

Meta-analysis of our results with previously published data on the association between rs6074022 and MS.

Abbreviation: GenMSA (NL), GenMSA (US), GenMSA (CH), IMSGC (UK), IMSGC (US), BWH/TT, and ANZgene. In the meta-analysis the total OR for all studies was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.10–1.23) with a statistical significance of p = 2.24×10−12. The heterogeneity test (Q-test) did not find significant differences between the studies (χ 2 (7) = 12.16, p = 0.10). Study ID: IMSGC (UK)–International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium United Kingdom; IMSGC (US)–International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium United States; GenMSA (CH)–Switzerland, Basel; GenMSA (NL)–The Netherlands, Amsterdam; GenMSA (US)–United States, San Francisco; ANZgene–Australia and New Zealand Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium; BWH/TT–Brigham & Woman's Hospital, Therapeutic Trials. F–female, M–male. -Analyzed cases and controls per data set after quality control. Results of our meta-analysis are shown in bold.

Discussion

CD40-CD40L is reportedly a common link in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. This hypothesis is supported by the established role of the CD40CD40L interaction in the development of several autoimmune conditions in animal models [20]–[23] and by the association of CD40 SNPs with the risk for a number of autoimmune diseases [16]–[19]. Moreover, the successfully completed Phase 1 of the clinical trial of SLE treatment by CD40L (http://www.biogenidec.com/research_product_pipeline.aspx?ID=5778) provides evidence of the important role of the CD40CD40L interaction in the pathogenesis of SLE. The CD40CD40L interaction is known to result in the switch to antigen-specific Th2 type response [36]. Therefore, the CD40CD40L complex is an extremely attractive and promising target for the development of drugs for suppressing autoimmune attack. However, for the successful creation of drugs, the molecular mechanism underlying the initiation of autoimmune inflammation through CD40CD40L in humans must be studied. In this work, we aimed to replicate in the Russian population the previously reported association of rs6074022[C] with MS [7]. We observed a statistically significant association of the allele rs6074022[C] with the development of MS (per C allele OR = 1.27, CI = 1.12–1.45, p = 3×10−4). Our results were in accordance with those of ANZgene (Table S4). The minor allele C of rs6074022 had a similar frequency both in the case and control groups. Also, the minor allele was the risk-associated allele in both studies. SNP rs1883832 was less significantly associated with MS than rs6074022 in both studies. In a previous meta-analysis of GWASs, rs6074022 has been implicated at a suggestive level at most [37]. In the meta-analysis of our results and the results of four previous studies, we obtain the association p-value of 2.24×10−12, which confirmed the association between MS and rs6074022 at a genome-wide significant level. Our findings of the association between MS and CD40 gene are in accordance with the hypothesis of the autoimmune nature of MS. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the involvement of SNPs of CD40 gene in the autoimmune processes was unclear for MS and other autoimmune diseases. The first step in solving this problem is to determine functional SNPs in the gene. Haplotype analysis revealed two haplotypes associated with MS: rs6074022[C]-rs1883832[C] (OR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.76–3.22, empirical p = 1.8×10−8) and rs6074022[T]-rs1883832[T] (OR = 2.68, 95% CI = 1.79–4.02, empirical p = 1.7×10−6). Each haplotype contains one of the “risk” alleles as identified in single-SNP analyses. Interestingly, the haplotype containing both risk alleles was not associated with MS in our analysis. We can speculate that this finding is consistent with the hypothesis of two functional polymorphisms located close to the marker SNPs, one increasing the risk of developing MS whereas the second being protective. In our study, both SNPs rs6074022 and rs1883832 were significantly associated with MS (per C allele OR = 1.27, CI = 1.12–1.45, p = 3×10−4; per T allele OR = 1.20, CI = 1.05–1.38, p = 7×10−3). We also demonstrated that the model including rs6074022 only sufficiently described the association. A large proportion of polymorphisms located in the same block of LD with a causal variant are likely to show an association with a disease. However, the polymorphisms that are in greater LD with the functional variant should on average have a stronger association. From our analysis, we can speculate that the association between rs1883832 and MS is induced by LD, whereas rs6074022 is a marker in stronger LD with the functional variant or is the functional variant itself. We may speculate that the functional variant(s) is likely to be located in the upstream region of the gene CD40 and is in higher LD with rs6074022 than with rs1883832.

Summary

Our results confirmed the association of SNP rs6074022 with the risk of MS development. Our estimates suggeste that the functional variant(s) is located in the upstream region of the gene. Further empirical studies are required to find the functional variant. Stratified analysis. Stratified analysis for rs6074022., B. Stratified analysis for rs1883832, C. Stratified analysis for rs1535045, D. Stratified analysis for rs1186998. Abbreviations: Nsk–Novosibirsk. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. LD between the studied SNPs of CD40 gene. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Minor allele frequency in control sub-groups from different cities. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. Results of stratified analysis of association between MS and SNPs from CD40 gene. Significant associations are shown in italic and bold. Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; NA, not applicable; Heterogeneity p-value-p-value of test of heterogeneity (Q-test). (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. Analysis of association between the clinical sub-phenotypes of MS with SNPs. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio, RRMS-relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, PPMS-primary progressive multiple sclerosis, SPMS-secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis, CIS-clinically isolated syndrome. Significant association are shown in bold. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. Compare the results of our study with one of ANZgene. RAF–risk allele frequency, OR–odds ratio, p-value–significant level, G* is correspond to C allele in our study. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  36 in total

1.  Evidence for VAV2 and ZNF433 as susceptibility genes for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sandra Nischwitz; Sabine Cepok; Antje Kroner; Christiane Wolf; Matthias Knop; Felix Müller-Sarnowski; Hildegard Pfister; Darina Roeske; Peter Rieckmann; Bernhard Hemmer; Marcus Ising; Manfred Uhr; Thomas Bettecken; Florian Holsboer; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Frank Weber
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Genome-wide association study identifies new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci on chromosomes 12 and 20.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  CD40 ligand-CD40 interactions are necessary for the initiation of insulitis and diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice.

Authors:  B Balasa; T Krahl; G Patstone; J Lee; R Tisch; H O McDevitt; N Sarvetnick
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Gene-gene interaction between CD40 and CD40L reduces bone mineral density and increases osteoporosis risk in women.

Authors:  B Pineda; J J Tarín; C Hermenegildo; P Laporta; A Cano; M Á García-Pérez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  CD40 gene polymorphisms confer risk of Behcet's disease but not of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome in a Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Feilan Chen; Shengping Hou; Zhengxuan Jiang; Yuanyuan Chen; Aize Kijlstra; James T Rosenbaum; Peizeng Yang
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 6.  The role of CD40-CD154 interactions in autoimmunity and the benefit of disrupting this pathway.

Authors:  Elias Toubi; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2004 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 2.815

7.  Prevention of collagen-induced arthritis with an antibody to gp39, the ligand for CD40.

Authors:  F H Durie; R A Fava; T M Foy; A Aruffo; J A Ledbetter; R J Noelle
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-09-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A functional TNFRSF5 gene variant is associated with risk of lymphoma.

Authors:  Christine F Skibola; Alexandra Nieters; Paige M Bracci; John D Curry; Luz Agana; Danica R Skibola; Alan Hubbard; Nikolaus Becker; Martyn T Smith; Elizabeth A Holly
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study.

Authors:  David A Hafler; Alastair Compston; Stephen Sawcer; Eric S Lander; Mark J Daly; Philip L De Jager; Paul I W de Bakker; Stacey B Gabriel; Daniel B Mirel; Adrian J Ivinson; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Simon G Gregory; John D Rioux; Jacob L McCauley; Jonathan L Haines; Lisa F Barcellos; Bruce Cree; Jorge R Oksenberg; Stephen L Hauser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Identification of a novel risk locus for multiple sclerosis at 13q31.3 by a pooled genome-wide scan of 500,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Manuel Comabella; David W Craig; Montse Camiña-Tato; Carlos Morcillo; Cristina Lopez; Arcadi Navarro; Jordi Rio; Xavier Montalban; Roland Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  MS risk allele rs1883832T is associated with decreased mRNA expression of CD40.

Authors:  Marta Wagner; Maciej Sobczyński; Małgorzata Bilińska; Anna Pokryszko-Dragan; Małgorzata Cyrul; Piotr Kuśnierczyk; Monika Jasek
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.444

2.  CD40-Mediated NF-κB Activation in B Cells Is Increased in Multiple Sclerosis and Modulated by Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ding Chen; Sara J Ireland; Gina Remington; Enrique Alvarez; Michael K Racke; Benjamin Greenberg; Elliot M Frohman; Nancy L Monson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  The MS Risk Allele of CD40 Is Associated with Reduced Cell-Membrane Bound Expression in Antigen Presenting Cells: Implications for Gene Function.

Authors:  Judith Field; Fernando Shahijanian; Stephen Schibeci; Laura Johnson; Melissa Gresle; Louise Laverick; Grant Parnell; Graeme Stewart; Fiona McKay; Trevor Kilpatrick; Helmut Butzkueven; David Booth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Polyreactive monoclonal autoantibodies in multiple sclerosis: functional selection from phage display library and characterization by deep sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Y A Lomakin; M Yu Zakharova; A A Belogurov; N A Bykova; M A Dronina; A E Tupikin; V D Knorre; A N Boyko; A V Favorov; M R Kabilov; N A Ponomarenko; Gabibov Gabibov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  In-silico analysis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) GWAS loci to novel connections.

Authors:  Md Mesbah-Uddin; Ramu Elango; Babajan Banaganapalli; Noor Ahmad Shaik; Fahad A Al-Abbasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Association between CD40 rs1883832 and immune-related diseases susceptibility: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiaxuan Qin; Jinchun Xing; Rongfu Liu; Bin Chen; Yuedong Chen; Xuan Zhuang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28

Review 7.  The CD40-CD40L Dyad in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Suzanne A B M Aarts; Tom T P Seijkens; Koos J F van Dorst; Christine D Dijkstra; Gijs Kooij; Esther Lutgens
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CD40 gene associate with the disease susceptibility and severity in knee osteoarthritis in the Chinese Han population: a case-control study.

Authors:  Zhen-Han Deng; Ming-Hua Sun; Yu-Sheng Li; Wei Luo; Fang-Jie Zhang; Jian Tian; Ping Wu; Wen-Feng Xiao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) family gene polymorphisms and the risk of multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mina Mohammadhosayni; Arezou Khosrojerdi; Keivan Lorian; Saeed Aslani; Danyal Imani; Bahman Razi; Farhad Babaie; Shahram Torkamandi
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  A comprehensive analysis of the association of common variants of ABCG2 with gout.

Authors:  Kuang-Hui Yu; Pi-Yueh Chang; Shih-Cheng Chang; Yah-Huei Wu-Chou; Li-An Wu; Ding-Pin Chen; Fu-Sung Lo; Jang-Jih Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.