Literature DB >> 23613313

Developing predictive systems models to address complexity and relevance for ecological risk assessment.

Valery E Forbes1, Peter Calow.   

Abstract

Ecological risk assessments (ERAs) are not used as well as they could be in risk management. Part of the problem is that they often lack ecological relevance; that is, they fail to grasp necessary ecological complexities. Adding realism and complexity can be difficult and costly. We argue that predictive systems models (PSMs) can provide a way of capturing complexity and ecological relevance cost-effectively. However, addressing complexity and ecological relevance is only part of the problem. Ecological risk assessments often fail to meet the needs of risk managers by not providing assessments that relate to protection goals and by expressing risk in ratios that cannot be weighed against the costs of interventions. Once more, PSMs can be designed to provide outputs in terms of value-relevant effects that are modulated against exposure and that can provide a better basis for decision making than arbitrary ratios or threshold values. Recent developments in the modeling and its potential for implementation by risk assessors and risk managers are beginning to demonstrate how PSMs can be practically applied in risk assessment and the advantages that doing so could have.
Copyright © 2013 SETAC.

Keywords:  Ecological relevance; Predictive systems models; Risk management; Risk quotients; Valuation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23613313     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  5 in total

1.  A framework for linking population model development with ecological risk assessment objectives.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Matthew Etterson; Nathan Pollesch; Kristina Garber; Andrew Kanarek; Wade Lehmann; Jill Awkerman
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.992

2.  Guidance for Developing Amphibian Population Models for Ecological Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Jill Awkerman; Sandy Raimondo; Amelie Schmolke; Nika Galic; Pamela Rueda-Cediel; Katherine Kapo; Chiara Accolla; Maxime Vaugeois; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Landscape Pattern and Ecological Risk Assessment in Guangxi Based on Land Use Change.

Authors:  Yanping Yang; Jianjun Chen; Yanping Lan; Guoqing Zhou; Haotian You; Xiaowen Han; Yu Wang; Xue Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  The pros and cons of ecological risk assessment based on data from different levels of biological organization.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Christopher J Salice; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 6.184

5.  Integrated presentation of ecological risk from multiple stressors.

Authors:  Benoit Goussen; Oliver R Price; Cecilie Rendal; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.