AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac disease characterized by ST segment elevation in V1-V3 ECG leads. Mutations SCN5A gene encoding for the cardiac voltage-gated Na(+) channel are found in some BrS patients, but also in family members with isolated conduction disturbances. However, some patients show coved ST elevation in the inferior or lateral leads whose association with SCN5A and familial conduction disturbances are poorly known. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two novel SCN5A mutations, D1430N and Q1476X, were identified in two unrelated families comprising patients with Brugada-like ST elevation located in the inferior leads or isolated conduction disturbances. Wild-type (WT) and D1430N mutant channels were expressed in tsA201 cells. Patch clamp electrophysiological experiments revealed total absence of Na(+) current resulting from Nav1.5 mutant when compared to WT channels. Treatments known to restore trafficking defect (incubation at low temperature, with mexiletine or lidocaine) did not restore Na(+) current supporting that Nav1.5 mutation is not a defective trafficking mutation. Furthermore, immunocytolabelling indicates the membrane localisation of both WT and mutant channels confirming what we observed in our patch clamp experiments. This suggests that the mutation may induce a complete block of Na(+) permeation. The nonsense mutation Q1476X was leading to a premature stop codon and was not expressed. CONCLUSION: Brugada-like ST elevation in the inferior ECG leads or isolated conduction disturbances were found in two unrelated families and associated with two novel SCN5A mutations. The missense and nonsense mutations are both resulting in a complete loss of ventricular Na(+) current explaining the phenotypes.
AIMS: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac disease characterized by ST segment elevation in V1-V3 ECG leads. Mutations SCN5A gene encoding for the cardiac voltage-gated Na(+) channel are found in some BrS patients, but also in family members with isolated conduction disturbances. However, some patients show coved ST elevation in the inferior or lateral leads whose association with SCN5A and familial conduction disturbances are poorly known. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two novel SCN5A mutations, D1430N and Q1476X, were identified in two unrelated families comprising patients with Brugada-like ST elevation located in the inferior leads or isolated conduction disturbances. Wild-type (WT) and D1430N mutant channels were expressed in tsA201 cells. Patch clamp electrophysiological experiments revealed total absence of Na(+) current resulting from Nav1.5 mutant when compared to WT channels. Treatments known to restore trafficking defect (incubation at low temperature, with mexiletine or lidocaine) did not restore Na(+) current supporting that Nav1.5 mutation is not a defective trafficking mutation. Furthermore, immunocytolabelling indicates the membrane localisation of both WT and mutant channels confirming what we observed in our patch clamp experiments. This suggests that the mutation may induce a complete block of Na(+) permeation. The nonsense mutation Q1476X was leading to a premature stop codon and was not expressed. CONCLUSION: Brugada-like ST elevation in the inferior ECG leads or isolated conduction disturbances were found in two unrelated families and associated with two novel SCN5A mutations. The missense and nonsense mutations are both resulting in a complete loss of ventricular Na(+) current explaining the phenotypes.
Authors: T Zimmer; C Biskup; S Dugarmaa; F Vogel; M Steinbis; T Böhle; Y S Wu; R Dumaine; K Benndorf Journal: J Membr Biol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 1.843
Authors: Hai Huang; Silvia G Priori; Carlo Napolitano; Michael E O'Leary; Mohamed Chahine Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jeroen P P Smits; Tamara T Koopmann; Ronald Wilders; Marieke W Veldkamp; Tobias Opthof; Zahir A Bhuiyan; Marcel M A M Mannens; Jeffrey R Balser; Hanno L Tan; Connie R Bezzina; Arthur A M Wilde Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: José Manuel Porres; Josep Brugada; Vicente Urbistondo; Francisco García; Karlos Reviejo; Pilar Marco Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: C Jiang; D Atkinson; J A Towbin; I Splawski; M H Lehmann; H Li; K Timothy; R T Taggart; P J Schwartz; G M Vincent Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Carmen R Valdivia; David J Tester; Benjamin A Rok; Co-Burn J Porter; Thomas M Munger; Arshad Jahangir; Jonathan C Makielski; Michael J Ackerman Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Y Zhang; T Wang; A Ma; X Zhou; J Gui; H Wan; R Shi; C Huang; A A Grace; C L-H Huang; D Trump; H Zhang; T Zimmer; M Lei Journal: Acta Physiol (Oxf) Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 6.311
Authors: Michelle M Monasky; Emanuele Micaglio; Daniela Giachino; Giuseppe Ciconte; Luigi Giannelli; Emanuela T Locati; Elisa Ramondini; Roberta Cotugno; Gabriele Vicedomini; Valeria Borrelli; Andrea Ghiroldi; Luigi Anastasia; Carlo Pappone Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Emanuele Micaglio; Michelle M Monasky; Nicoletta Resta; Rosanna Bagnulo; Giuseppe Ciconte; Luigi Gianelli; Emanuela T Locati; Gabriele Vicedomini; Valeria Borrelli; Andrea Ghiroldi; Luigi Anastasia; Sara Benedetti; Chiara Di Resta; Maurizio Ferrari; Carlo Pappone Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 5.923