| Literature DB >> 18616619 |
Y Zhang1, T Wang, A Ma, X Zhou, J Gui, H Wan, R Shi, C Huang, A A Grace, C L-H Huang, D Trump, H Zhang, T Zimmer, M Lei.
Abstract
AIM: We compared the clinical and physiological consequences of the novel mutation R878C in a highly conserved pore residue in domain II (S5-S6) of human, hNa(v)1.5, cardiac Na(+) channels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18616619 PMCID: PMC2659387 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2008.01883.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Physiol (Oxf) ISSN: 1748-1708 Impact factor: 6.311
Figure 1Pedigree and electrocardiographic features of the affected family. (a) Pedigree of the family with phenotypic and genotypic information. Arrow indicates the proband. (b, c) ECG and Holter data of proband. (d) Twelve-lead ECG of II-2; (e) 12-lead ECG of II-6.
Summary of ECG parameters and clinical information of mutation carriers and non-carriers
| Age (years) | Gender M : F | Syncope (yes : no) | HR beats min−1 | P width (ms) | PR interval (ms) | QRS interval (ms) | QTc (ms) | ST elevation (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R878C carriers | 4 | 37 ± 12 | 3 : 1 | 1 : 3 | 61 ± 4 | 108 ± 5 | 190 ± 6 | 103 ± 2.5 | 373 ± 23 | 2.1 ± 0.4 |
| Non-carriers | 13 | 30 ± 5 | 6 : 7 | 0 : 13 | 75 ± 3 | 91 ± 2 | 140 ± 11 | 88 ± 1.6 | 387 ± 7 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| ns | ns | ns | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 | <0.01 | ns | <0.0001 |
ns, not significant.
Figure 2R878C mutation of SCN5A sodium channel. (a) Sequencing of SCN5A mutation: heterozygotic mutation C→T transition at nucleotide 2826. (b) Missense mutation of R878C. (c) Position of R878C on Nav1.5 channel. (d–e) Alignment analysis of Nav channel isoforms. R878 is a residue that is highly conserved in Nav channel isoforms (d) and among Scn5a in different rat, mouse and human species (e).
Figure 3Characterization of iNa of WT and mutant channels in HEK293 cells. Inset: HEK293 ells were clamped at a holding potential of −120 mV and subjected to test voltage steps each lasting 30 ms that were made to membrane potentials between −110 and +50 mV in 5 or 10 mV increments and imposed at a pulsing frequency of 1.0 Hz. (a, b) WT-hNav1.5 and WT-hNav1.5 with β1 subunit. (c, d) Mutant R878C-hNav1.5 and mutant R878C-hNav1.5 with β1 subunit. (e) Substitution of R878K. (f) Bar graph summarizing peak iNa (pA pF−1) in each of the experimental situations above.
Figure 4Characterization of peak current amplitudes of WT and mutant channels in Xenopus oocytes. Injection of R878C-hNav1.5 cRNA did not alter the current amplitude through WT-hNav1.5 channels (compare WT-hNav1.5 + H2O with WT-hNav1.5 + R878C-hNav1.5). In control experiments, we confirmed that a twofold higher WT-hNav1.5 cRNA concentration (WT-hNav1.5 + WT-hNav1.5) resulted in the respective increase in the peak current amplitude. Number of measurements was between 13 and 35, number of oocyte batches was at least 3.
Electrophysiological properties of WT-hNav1.5 channels co-expressed with R878C-hNav1.5 in Xenopus oocytes
| Steady-state inactivation | Steady-state activation | Inactivation time constants (τh) | Recovery time constants (τrec) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel | −35 mV(ms) | −25 mV(ms) | −15 mV(ms) | τfast | τslow (ms) | ||||||
| WT-hNav1.5 | −64.5 ± 0.4 | 6 | −33.1 ± 1.0 | 5 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 5 | 54.4 ± 0.3 | 97 ± 18 | 5 |
| WT-hNav1.5/R878C-hNav1.5 | −64.1 ± 0.6 | 9 | −33.2 ± 0.6 | 9 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 6 | 63.6 ± 0.2 | 105 ± 12 | 5 |
Inactivation and recovery curves were fitted mono-exponentially yielding τh and bi-exponentially yielding τfast and τslow respectively. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 5Surface membrane localization of SCN5A persists despite the R878C mutation. GFP fluorescence in HEK293 cells of WT-hNav1.5 (Aa) and R878C-hNav1.5 (Ba) and membrane staining of the fluorescent Cy3-conjugated E3-targeted anti-Nav1.5 antibody (Ab and Bb) and overlays (Ac and Bc) of these confocal images. Expression and intracellular location following co-transfection with plasmids for pECFP-WT-hNav1.5 and pEYFP-R878C- hNav1.5: exposure to their respective excitation wavelengths confirms co-expression of both WT-hNav1.5-CFP (Ca) and R878C hNav1.5-YFP (Cb) with similar subcellular localizations as reflected in the overlaid images (Cc). Scale bars = 5 μm for all panels.
Figure 6Results of computational modelling of sino-atrial (SA) node function as a result of the R878C mutation. (a) Toluidine blue-stained tissue section through the SA node and its surrounding atrial muscle of the crista terminalis cut through the leading pacemaker site of the rabbit heart. (b) Model of the SA node and its surrounding atrium. (c) Computer simulations of the effect on pacemaker activity by reduction in Na+ channel function.