Literature DB >> 23612906

Spatially restricted electrical activation of retinal ganglion cells in the rabbit retina by hexapolar electrode return configuration.

Amgad G Habib1, Morven A Cameron, Gregg J Suaning, Nigel H Lovell, John W Morley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Visual prostheses currently in development aim to restore some form of vision to patients suffering from diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. Most rely on electrically stimulating inner retinal cells via electrodes implanted on or near the retina, resulting in percepts of light termed 'phosphenes'. Activation of spatially distinct populations of cells in the retina is key for pattern vision to be produced. To achieve this, the electrical stimulation must be localized, activating cells only in the direct vicinity of the stimulating electrode(s). With this goal in mind, a hexagonal return (hexapolar) configuration has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional monopolar or bipolar return configurations for electrically stimulating the retina. This study investigated the efficacy of the hexapolar configuration in localizing the activation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), compared to a monopolar configuration. APPROACH: Patch-clamp electrophysiology was used to measure the activation thresholds of RGCs in whole-mount rabbit retina to monopolar and hexapolar electrical stimulation, applied subretinally. MAIN
RESULTS: Hexapolar activation thresholds for RGCs located outside the hex guard were found to be significantly (>2 fold) higher than those located inside the area of tissue bounded by the hex guard. The hexapolar configuration localized the activation of RGCs more effectively than its monopolar counterpart. Furthermore, no difference in hexapolar thresholds or localization was observed when using cathodic-first versus anodic-first stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The hexapolar configuration may provide an improved method for electrically stimulating spatially distinct populations of cells in retinal tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23612906     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  8 in total

1.  Differential effect of brief electrical stimulation on voltage-gated potassium channels.

Authors:  Morven A Cameron; Amr Al Abed; Yossi Buskila; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatially patterned electrical stimulation to enhance resolution of retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Mark Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Victoria H Fan; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar S Madugula; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Retinal Prosthetic Approaches to Enhance Visual Perception for Blind Patients.

Authors:  Shinyong Shim; Kyungsik Eom; Joonsoo Jeong; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 7.  Modeling the formation process of grouping stimuli sets through cortical columns and microcircuits to feature neurons.

Authors:  Frank Klefenz; Adam Williamson
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 8.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.