Literature DB >> 23612315

Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after minimally invasive surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer is low: a multi-institutional study.

S Kumar1, Z Al-Wahab, S Sarangi, J Woelk, R Morris, A Munkarah, S C Dowdy, A Mariani, W Cliby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 30-day prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial (EC) and cervical cancers (CC).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at two large tertiary care centers between 2006 and 2011. Patients having MIS for EC or CC were included. Cases converted to laparotomy were excluded. The primary outcome measure was clinically diagnosed VTE within 30 days of operation.
RESULTS: Of the 558 patients, 90% had EC and 10% had CC. Modalities of hysterectomy included robotic (88%), vaginal (9%), and laparoscopic (3%). A total of 66% had pelvic and 35% had paraaortic lymphadenectomy. The VTE prophylaxes were sequential compression devices (100%) and heparin (39%). There were no VTE events during hospital stay (95% CI, 0.0%-0.7%). The 30-day prevalence of VTE was (0.5%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.6%). The hitherto recommended risk criteria for giving extended 30-day thromboprophylaxis by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) or by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) did not predict risk of VTE in our population.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of VTE in EC and CC undergoing MIS is very low. The existing 30-day risk prediction models proposed by the ACOG and ASCO stem from open surgery patients and do not appear to apply to MIS patients. Certainly, we found no evidence supporting the use of extended prophylactic heparin in this setting. Further research is urgently needed to define the role of any duration of thromboprophylaxis in MIS patients with endometrial or cervix cancer.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23612315     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism by Type of Gynecologic Malignancy and Surgical Modality in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Ashley Graul; Nawar Latif; Xiaochen Zhang; Lorraine T Dean; Mark Morgan; Robert Giuntoli; Robert Burger; Sarah Kim; Emily Ko
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 2.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology surgery.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Venous thromboembolic events in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Alpa M Nick; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Effectiveness and safety of expanded perioperative thromboprophylaxis in complex gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Bradley R Corr; Andrea M Winter; Mary D Sammel; Christina S Chu; Brian F Gage; Andrea R Hagemann
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Validation of two risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Tao Guo; Miaomiao Li; Cui-Qin Sang; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Ruijun Guo; Ruigang Lu; Peng Qu; Wen Cao; Wei Zhao; Bin Li; Jian-Liu Wang; Jian-Jun Zhai; Lei Song; Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-01

6.  Predicting of Venous Thromboembolism for Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery.

Authors:  Hong Qu; Zhan Li; Zhenguo Zhai; Chongdong Liu; Shuzhen Wang; Shuli Guo; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.