| Literature DB >> 23612029 |
Myung Kyung Lee1, Hyeoun-Ae Park, Young Ho Yun, Yoon Jung Chang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most dietary and exercise interventions developed to date for cancer survivors have employed intensive clinic-based face-to-face counseling sessions. However, when the clinic-based face-to-face intervention ends, the participants cannot receive feedback from the experts, and the motivation for regular exercise and diet practices decreases. One way to overcome the shortcomings of clinic-based face-to-face intervention is to employ the Internet to this end. To maximize effectiveness when providing Web-based interventions, action planning should be able to start at the right time, education should be tailored to motivational readiness, and self-efficacy should be enhanced at appropriate intervals.Entities:
Keywords: Internet; diet; exercise; health planning; self-care; wellness programs
Year: 2013 PMID: 23612029 PMCID: PMC3628152 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.2331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Res Protoc ISSN: 1929-0748
Protocol of the Web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention program.
| Stage of change | Interventional goal | Principal strategies | Content theme in the educational component | Functions used for delivering interventions |
| Precontemplation | Increase awareness of the need to change exercise and dietary behavior | Consciousness-raising | Effect of exercise and a balanced diet on health | Weekly Web-based tailored education (5-10 minutes daily). |
| Contemplation | Motivate and increase confidence in the ability to change; build motivation for change | Self reevaluation | Specific benefits of exercise and use of a balanced diet; barriers toward such achievements | Weekly Web-based tailored education (5-10 minutes daily) |
| Preparation | Develop and negotiate a plan for exercise and use of a balanced diet | Self-liberation | Recalling the effects of exercise and a balanced diet on health | Weekly Web-based tailored education (5-10 minutes daily) |
| Action | Reaffirm the commitment to exercise and to use of a balanced diet | Reinforcement management | Evaluation of current exercise and dietary pattern | Weekly Web-based tailored education (5-10 minutes daily) |
| Maintenance | Develop strategies to prevent relapse |
Characteristics of end users participating in the usability evaluation.
| Characteristic | Participants | |
|
|
| |
|
| Mean (SD) | 41.5 (6.3) |
|
|
| |
|
| High school | 7 (23) |
|
| College or beyond | 23 (77) |
|
|
| |
|
| Married | 27 (90) |
|
| Not married | 3 (10) |
|
|
| |
|
| Mean (SD) | 161.6 (107.8) |
|
| Range | 26–349 |
|
|
| |
|
| Breast-conserving | 20 (67) |
|
| Mastectomy | 10 (33) |
|
|
| |
|
| No | 4 (13) |
|
| Yes | 26 (87) |
|
|
| |
|
| No | 3 (10) |
|
| Yes | 27 (90) |
|
|
| |
|
| Stage 0 | 2 (7) |
|
| Stage I | 12 (40) |
|
| Stage II | 13 (43) |
|
| Stage III | 3 (10) |
Usability evaluation of health planner by end user responses.
|
| N=30 | |
|
|
| |
|
| 1. I thought this program was easy to understand. | 5.9 (1.4) |
|
| 2. I could complete the tasks that were asked of me in this program. | 5.7 (1.4) |
|
| 3. I found this program confusing. | 1.5 (1.1) |
|
| 4. I thought that this program was easy to use. | 5.9 (2.0) |
|
| 5. I would choose to use this type of program in the future to complete an intervention that aims to improve my health. | 6.5 (1.5) |
|
| 6. The program was too complex. | 2.2 (1.3) |
|
| 7. I would need help from a technical support person to be able to use this program. | 1.3 (1.8) |
|
| 8. The program ran smoothly. | 6.0 (1.7) |
|
| 9. The program was inconsistent (there were parts of the program that seemed out of place). | 2.0 (1.3) |
|
| 10. I think that most people would learn to use this program quickly. | 5.7 (1.3) |
|
| 11. Using this program felt awkward to me. | 1.9 (1.4) |
|
| 12. I felt very confident using this program. | 6.0 (1.8) |
|
| 13. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this program. | 2.4 (1.6) |
|
| 81.3 (20.2) | |
aResponses were on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
bThis is a composite of the responses to all usability questions (a 100-point score); higher scores indicate greater perceived usability.