GOALS OF THE WORK: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the interest and exercise preferences of an institution-based sample of brain tumor patients. Secondary aims were to examine potential differences in participant's interest and preferences by exercise behavior and select demographic/medical variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, 106 brain tumor patients (age range, 32 to 83 years) who received treatment at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center (BTC) at Duke completed a questionnaire that assessed self-reported exercise behavior, exercise interest and preferences during active and off-treatment periods. MAIN RESULTS: For exercise program preferences, participants were significantly more interested and felt more capable of participating in an exercise program following compared to during adjuvant therapy. Approximately equal proportions of brain tumor patients preferred to exercise at home with their spouse or other family members. These preferences were consistent across both cancer treatment-related time periods. For exercise information preferences, a higher proportion of respondents preferred receiving information via technologically based approaches (i.e., Internet, CD-ROM, and mailed correspondence) compared with more traditional methods (i.e., mail or face-to-face counseling). Chi-square analyses revealed that a small number of exercise program and information preferences were modified by exercise, medical, and demographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: Brain tumor patients may have unique and varied preferences compared with other cancer populations. Incorporating patient's preferences into rehabilitation programs and clinical exercise investigations may optimize the potential benefits of this modality for patients with neurologic malignancies.
GOALS OF THE WORK: The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the interest and exercise preferences of an institution-based sample of brain tumorpatients. Secondary aims were to examine potential differences in participant's interest and preferences by exercise behavior and select demographic/medical variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, 106 brain tumorpatients (age range, 32 to 83 years) who received treatment at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center (BTC) at Duke completed a questionnaire that assessed self-reported exercise behavior, exercise interest and preferences during active and off-treatment periods. MAIN RESULTS: For exercise program preferences, participants were significantly more interested and felt more capable of participating in an exercise program following compared to during adjuvant therapy. Approximately equal proportions of brain tumorpatients preferred to exercise at home with their spouse or other family members. These preferences were consistent across both cancer treatment-related time periods. For exercise information preferences, a higher proportion of respondents preferred receiving information via technologically based approaches (i.e., Internet, CD-ROM, and mailed correspondence) compared with more traditional methods (i.e., mail or face-to-face counseling). Chi-square analyses revealed that a small number of exercise program and information preferences were modified by exercise, medical, and demographic variables. CONCLUSIONS:Brain tumorpatients may have unique and varied preferences compared with other cancer populations. Incorporating patient's preferences into rehabilitation programs and clinical exercise investigations may optimize the potential benefits of this modality for patients with neurologic malignancies.
Authors: Kerry S Courneya; Kristina H Karvinen; Kristin L Campbell; Robert G Pearcey; George Dundas; Valerie Capstick; Katia S Tonkin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: S Grinspoon; C Corcoran; K Parlman; M Costello; D Rosenthal; E Anderson; T Stanley; D Schoenfeld; B Burrows; D Hayden; N Basgoz; A Klibanski Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2000-09-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Victoria Mock; Constantine Frangakis; Nancy E Davidson; Mary E Ropka; Mary Pickett; Barbara Poniatowski; Kerry J Stewart; Lane Cameron; Kristin Zawacki; Laura J Podewils; Gary Cohen; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Linda Trinh; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Ryan E Rhodes; Scott North; Kerry S Courneya Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-09-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Erin L McGowan; Amy E Speed-Andrews; Ryan E Rhodes; Chris M Blanchard; S Nicole Culos-Reed; Christine M Friedenreich; Kerry S Courneya Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Cindy L Carter; Georgiana Onicescu; Kathleen B Cartmell; Katherine R Sterba; James Tomsic; Todd Fox; Erica Dunmeyer; Anthony J Alberg Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jae Youn Chung; Dong Hoon Lee; Ji-Hye Park; Mi Kyung Lee; Dong-Woo Kang; Jihee Min; Dong-Il Kim; Duck Hyoun Jeong; Nam Kyu Kim; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Lee W Jones; Justin Y Jeon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-01-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: S Nicole Culos-Reed; Heather J Leach; Lauren C Capozzi; Jacob Easaw; Neil Eves; Guillaume Y Millet Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Karin Gehring; Corelien Jj Kloek; Neil K Aaronson; Kasper W Janssen; Lee W Jones; Margriet M Sitskoorn; Martijn M Stuiver Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 3.477