Literature DB >> 23610654

Time-dependent gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis of the injured anterior cruciate ligament.

T Naraoka1, Y Ishibashi, E Tsuda, Y Yamamoto, T Kusumi, I Kakizaki, S Toh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate time-dependent gene expression of injured human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), and to evaluate the histological changes of the ACL remnant in terms of cellular characterisation.
METHODS: Injured human ACL tissues were harvested from 105 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction and divided into four phases based on the period from injury to surgery. Phase I was < three weeks, phase II was three to eight weeks, phase III was eight to 20 weeks, and phase IV was ≥ 21 weeks. Gene expressions of these tissues were analysed in each phase by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction using selected markers (collagen types 1 and 3, biglycan, decorin, α-smooth muscle actin, IL-6, TGF-β1, MMP-1, MMP-2 and TIMP-1). Immunohistochemical staining was also performed using primary antibodies against CD68, CD55, Stat3 and phosphorylated-Stat3 (P-Stat3).
RESULTS: Expression of IL-6 was mainly seen in phases I, II and III, collagen type 1 in phase II, MMP-1, 2 in phase III, and decorin, TGF-β1 and α-smooth muscle actin in phase IV. Histologically, degradation and scar formation were seen in the ACL remnant after phase III. The numbers of CD55 and P-Stat3 positive cells were elevated from phase II to phase III.
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated cell numbers including P-Stat3 positive cells were not related to collagens but to MMPs' expressions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Anterior cruciate ligament; Gene expression; Immunohistochemical analysis; Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs); Stat3; Synovial fibroblast-like cell

Year:  2012        PMID: 23610654      PMCID: PMC3626253          DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.110.2000118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint Res        ISSN: 2046-3758            Impact factor:   5.853


Our hypothesis was that there is a time-dependent alteration of anabolic and catabolic matrix gene expression and cell distribution in an injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) Expressions of COL1 and -3 were seen mainly in the subacute phase, and the expressions of MMP-1 and MMP-2 followed by biglycan, decorin and α-SMA were seen in the chronic phases Stat3-activated cells also existed in injured ACL mainly in the chronic phases We showed the changes of gene expressions of remnant human ACL over time The limitations of this study were that a normal control was lacking and protein levels were not examined

Introduction

The injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is considered to exhibit an impaired healing response and attempts at surgical repair have not been successful.[1,2] The reasons for this have been attributed to the hostile environment of synovial fluid.[3] In the intra-articular environment of the ACL, there is no evidence of tissue-bridging between the femoral and tibial remnants of the ACL, and this structural defect is likely to be a key factor in the failure of the ACL healing.[4] Many studies using a provisional scaffold have been conducted to improve the results of strategies for ACL healing; however, the mechanical properties of these products were not satisfactory when compared with the intact ACL.[5,6] Besides the structural aspects, cellular factors are also important for ACL healing. Histologically, the ruptured human ACL undergoes four phases: inflammation, epiligamentous regeneration, proliferation and remodeling, and a synovial lining cell layer containing myofibroblast-like cells expressing α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) is formed on the surface of the ruptured ACL between eight and 20 weeks after rupture.[4] Myofibroblasts activated by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) promote the formation of scar tissue in wound healing[7] and also in knee arthrofibrosis tissue; myofibroblasts expressing α-SMA may be involved in tissue fibrosis.[8] It is possible that myofibroblast-like cells in the synovial layer of the injured ACL also play an important role in scar tissue formation that can negatively affect the mechanical properties of the ligament. The degeneration of the remnant ACL, caused by proteases and enzymes, progresses gradually after injury.[9] Previous studies have revealed that higher levels of active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 are seen in ACL fibroblasts than in those of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), and may be one of the reasons for the poor healing response of the injured ACL.[10,11] The differences of the characteristics of ACL and MCL fibroblasts may be due to the environment of synovial fluid. Interleukin (IL)-6, one of the inflammatory cytokines, was found to be highly elevated in synovial fluid from ACL injured knees compared with uninjured controls.[12] The IL-6-type cytokines exert a inflammatory effect through the transcription factors termed STATs (signal transducer and activator of transcription),[13] and Stat3 has been shown to be active in synovial fibroblasts secreting proteases and enzymes that degrade surrounding matrix in adjuvant arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).[14] It is possible that these synovial fibroblasts also exist in the remnants of the ruptured ACL, leading to further degeneration. The objectives of this study were to examine the time-dependent gene expression for various proteins that contribute to the composition of ACL tissue, its structural organisation and reaction to injury, and also to evaluate the remnant ACL histologically in terms of degradation of extracellular matrix and cellular characterisation. Our hypothesis was that in injured ACL, gene expressions involved in degradation of surrounding matrix are elevated besides increasing Stat3-activated cells, followed by high expressions related to the subsequent formation of scar tissue.

Materials and Methods

Injured ACL tissue was harvested from 105 patients during primary ACL reconstruction. There were 38 males and 67 females with a mean age of 24.2 years (12 to 59). The injured ligaments were transected at their tibial attachment, femoral attachment or adhesive site of the ruptured end, and these tibial stumps removed en bloc arthroscopically. The removed stumps were marked with a suture at the site of tibial transaction. These specimens were divided into four phases based on the interval from injury to surgery, according to a previous histological study[4]: phase I was < three weeks (n = 20); phase II three to eight weeks (n = 35); phase III eight to 20 weeks (n = 27); and phase IV > 20 weeks (n = 23). All specimens were obtained with informed consent and with the approval of the Committee of Medical Ethics of our institute. A total of 16 injured samples were allocated to histological and immunohistochemical analysis (comprising four in each group) and another 16 allocated to western blotting test (four in each group). The remaining 73 injured ACLs were used for identification of gene expression.

Identification of up- and down-regulated gene expression during injury using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

A total of 73 injured ACLs were used for mRNA expression analysis. These 73 patients had a mean age of 23.9 years (12 to 59); 12 were phase I, 27 phase II, 19 phase III and 15 phase IV. Two sections were removed from each ligament: from the ruptured end and from the mid substance approximately 1 cm from the bony insertion. In the cases of partial tear, specimens were harvested from ruptured bundles in the same way. A total 30 mg of tissue pieces were homogenised in Buffer RLT (Qiagen, Austin, California) using a Polytron (Kinematica Inc., Bohemia, New York). Total RNA was isolated from the samples with an RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Midi Kit (Qiagen) and 0.5 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using the SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). PCR reactions were performed and monitored using an ABI Prism 7300 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California). The data were analysed by SDS 2.1 software (Applied Biosystems), and all the markers were normalised to the reference gene, glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The Ct value of each marker was subtracted from the Ct value of GAPDH to derive ΔCt value. The normalised expression of each marker was calculated as 2-ΔCt (Applied Biosystems). Primers for human collagen types 1 (COL 1) (Hs00164004_ml) and 3 (COL 3) (Hs00164103_ml), biglycan (Hs00156076_ml), decorin (Hs00370385_ml), α-SMA (Hs00426835_gl), IL-6 (99999032_ml), TGF-β1 (Hs00998133_ml), MMP-1 (Hs00233958_ml), MMP-2 (Hs00234422_ml), tissue inhibitor of metalloprotainases-1 (TIMP-1) (Hs00171558_ml) and GAPDH (Hs99999905_ml) were pre-designed by Assays-on-demand Gene Expression products (Applied Biosystems). These markers were selected for the study based on their functions that were suspected to contribute toward ACL tissue composition and structural organisation[15] and reaction to injury.

Histological and immunohistochemical analysis

A total of 16 ACLs were used for histological and immunohistochemical analysis. The patients from which the samples were harvested had a mean age of 22.3 years (14 to 43), and there were four samples from each phase. After the ligaments removed en bloc were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, specimens were embedded longitudinally in paraffin and sectioned. Serial sections of 4 µm were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Next, tissue sections were stained with primary antibodies to the macrophage marker CD68 (clone KP1; Dako, Hamburg, Germany) at a dilution of 1:100, the fibroblast marker CD55[16,17] (H-319; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, California) at a dilution of 1:25, Stat3 (79D7; Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts) at a dilution of 1: 25 and Phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705, D3A7; Cell Signaling Technology Inc.) (P-Stat3) at a dilution of 1:50 on automated Benchmark system (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, Arizona). Image analysis was performed in ruptured ends and midsubstances with multiple digital photomicrographs (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) of sections taken under high-power field. Immunopositive areas in ten representative sections of each sample were analysed with ImageJ (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) software.

Western blotting

A total of 16 ACLs were used for western blotting. The patients from which the samples were harvested had a mean age of 26.3 years (13 to 56), and there were four samples from each phase. Samples were homogenised in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 140 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA (3 Na), 20 mM Tris-HCl PH 7.4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 mg/ml iodoacetamide. Proteins were quantified (Bradford; Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) and equal amounts of protein (15 µg) were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to polyvinylidine fluoride transfer membrane, and blocked for 1 h at 25°C with PhosphoBLOKER Blocking Reagent (Cell Biolabs Inc., San Diego, California). The membrane was then incubated with an appropriate dilution of anti-phosphorylated Stat3 antibody (Tyr705, D3A7; Cell Signaling Technology Inc.) and anti-Stat3 antibody (79D7; Cell Signaling Technology Inc.) overnight at 37°C, and reacted with enhanced chemiluminescence anti-rabbit IgG antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Immune complex detection was performed using a Kodak X-AR (Eastman Kodak Co. Scientific Imaging Systems, Rochester, New York). Semi-quantitative analysis was performed with ImageJ software.

Statistical analysis

Data from gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis are presented as a median and a Steel-Dwass test was performed to detect time-dependent variation of each marker for multiple comparisons. Data from western blotting are presented as mean with standard deviation (sd) and Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed on the image data to detect time-dependent variation of protein levels for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance of was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Pattern of gene expression

There were no significant differences between the four phases in patient gender or age. Although there was a wide age range of the patients, this study found that there was no significant difference between age and gene expression of the measured substances (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, p > 0.05). COL 1 was significantly higher in phase II than in phases I and IV (p = 0.008 and p = 0.009, respectively) (Fig. 1). COL 3 showed no statistical differences among the phases. Biglycan was significantly higher in phases II and III than in phase I (p = 0.039 and p = 0.026, respectively) and decorin was significantly higher in phase IV than in the other phases (p = 0.017, p = 0.0005 and p = 0.018, respectively). α-SMA was significantly higher in phase IV compared with phase I only (p = 0.029). IL-6 was higher in phases I, II and III compared with phase IV (p = 0.011, p = 0.013 and p = 0.016, respectively). TGF-β1 was significantly higher in phase IV than in phases I and II (p = 0.020 and p = 0.031, respectively). MMP-1 and MMP-2 were higher in phase III compared with phase IV (p = 0.003 and p = 0.025, respectively). TIMP-1 expression level was constant throughout all phases. Box plots showing the relative mRNA expression of collagen type 1 (COL 1), COL 3, biglycan, decorin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), MMP-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1). In each box plot the y-axis represents the normalised ratio, the box the median and interquartile range, the whiskers the 10th and 90th percentiles and ° the outliers. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).

Histological change and distribution of Stat3-activated fibroblast-like cells

H & E staining showed that the encapsulation of the synovial tissue and tissue degradation were seen at the ruptured end from phase II to III, and tissue changed to fibrosis in phase IV (Fig. 2a). CD68 positive cells existed in phase I in the ruptured end and midsubstance, and from phase II, CD68 positive cells were mainly seen in the synovial layer. Conversely, the number of CD55 positive cells was higher in phase III than in other phases in both ruptured end (all p < 0.001) and midsubstance of the remnant ACL (p < 0.001, p = 0.042 and p = 0.001 for phases I, II and IV) (Fig. 2b). In phase IV, these cells existed merely in the synovial lining layer of the ruptured end and were noticeably low in density. Stat3 positive cells as a positive control were also localised with CD55 positive cells on serial sections. The number of P-Stat3 positive cells was higher in phase III in both the ruptured end and midsubstance than in the early phases (both p < 0.001), being especially prominent in the synovial lining layer (Fig. 2c). In phase IV, the positive cells remained in the synovial lining layer, particularly in the ruptured end. Expression levels of P-Stat3 were higher in phases III and IV than in phases I and II from the western blotting analysis (Fig. 3). Figure 2a – haemotoxylin and eosin staining (H & E) and cell distributions positive for CD68, CD55, Stat3 and P-Stat3 of the ruptured end of the ligament in each phase. Figures 2b and 2c – box plots showing quantification using ImageJ software of b) the CD55 positive area and c) the P-Stat3 positive areas for the ruptured and mid areas of the ligament for each phase. The box represents the median and interquartile range, the whiskers the 10th and 90th percentiles and ° the outliers (*, significant difference (p < 0.01) compared with phases I and II; **, significant difference compared with phases I, II and IV). Figure 3a – western blotting of Stat3 and P-Stat3 in each phase. Figure 3b – bar chart showing the mean P-Stat3 quantification using ImageJ software. Error bars represent the standard deviation.

Discussion

The present study showed that COL 1 and 3 expressions were seen mainly in phase II. Conversely, MMPs expressions and the number of CD55 and P-Stat3 positive cells were highest in phase III among the phases. Expressions of decorin, α-SMA and TGF-β1 were observed mainly in phase IV compared with other phases. These results corresponded to our hypotheses. A time-dependent alteration of anabolic and catabolic gene expression has been shown after ACL injury in a rabbit experimental model,[18] and the results of our human study corresponded in some points and differed in others. COL1 and 3 expressions were mainly seen in the subacute phase (phase II). These results were consistent with the experimental model. High COL1 expression in the early phase after rupture was also seen in other studies[15,19] and the increase in collagen production including COL1 and COL 3 early after injury is a typical cell response during tissue healing.[20] In the chronic phase after injury (phases III and IV), the genetic expression of some proteins changed dramatically. Expression of MMPs, especially MMP-2 was seen mainly in phase III, suggesting a degradable rather than a regenerative feature of organisation on a genetic level, because MMP-2 expression was higher in contrast to unchanged remained expression of TIMP-1. Furthermore, expressions of proteoglycans and α-SMA were seen mainly in phase IV. These results were different from an experimental study that showed high expression of MMP-13 and α-SMA at 1 week after ACL injury.[18] One of the reasons for these differences might be the differences of cytokine profiles. First, the present human study showed that IL-6 expression was seen mainly from phase I to III. Previous studies confirmed high levels of IL-6 in the synovial fluid in the acute phase after ACL injury[12,21] and the IL-6 type cytokines are an important family of mediators involved in general inflammation and healing response.[13] These results suggested that injured human ACL is chronically inflamed and native tissue healing is delayed compared with other connective tissues. Second, TGF-β1 expression was seen mainly in phase IV. TGF-β1 is a major stimulator that plays a significant role in both the initiation of fibrotic cascades in skeletal muscle and the induction of myogenic cells to differentiate into myofibroblastic cells expressing vimentin and α-SMA in injured muscle.[22] Murray et al[4] described in a previous study that many of the epiligamentous and synovial cells encapsulating the remnants of the ACL contained α-SMA after rupture, and the results of our study partly correlated with theirs. Expression of decorin was also significantly elevated in phase IV. A previous study has shown that increased decorin expression is associated with scar formation.[23] The higher expression of proteoglycans in addition to TGF-β1 and α-SMA suggested fibrotic characteristics in phase IV. These observed gene expressions raised a new theory that higher expression of COL 1 is not related to cell number. CD55 positive cells were significantly highest in phase III among the phases, but COL 1 expression was lower and MMPs, PGs, TGF-β1 and α-SMA expressions were elevated. Therefore, we speculated that increased cells at the remnant ACL contained several cell types of fibroblast having different characteristics. Synovial fibroblast-like cells appeared to be of fibroblast origin,[24] however, the authors demonstrated that the functional spectrum of these cells showed clear differences from fibroblasts from other sites.[25,26] These cells secrete a variety of cytokines[27] as well as matrix metalloproteinase,[28] proteoglycans and arachidonic acid metabolites.[29] Moreover, another study indicated that Stat3 may be an important molecule for RA synovial fibroblast survival, secreting proteases and enzymes that degrade surrounding matrix.[30] Our results revealed that higher IL-6 expression was seen until phase III and the number of Stat3-activated cells was elevated in phase III in not only the synovial layer but also in the midsubstance of the remnant ACL. It is possible that these cells triggered by IL-6 expression may produce differences in healing potential to other extra-articular ligaments. Primary repair by suture has been extensively used in the past but is currently regarded as unsatisfactory. Strand et al[31] observed a 50% percentage of instability after long-term follow-up of primary ACL repair and the biological factors are still unknown. Loss of mechanical signal results in an increase in MMP-13 and α-SMA expression in the experimental model.[18] These data, when combined with the results of the current study, support the theory that stress deprivation may bring matrix degeneration and contraction. However, suture alone or besides platelet-rich plasma, was not satisfactory in mechanical properties compared with intact ACL.[6] It is possible that change of fibroblast’s characteristics induced by cytokines might be also responsible for poor healing capacity of the ACL, especially synovial fibroblast-like cells activated by IL-6. Short-term regulation of these cells might reduce MMPs activity and be beneficial if ligament augmentation or primary repair were a treatment option. One limitation of this study was that a normal control was lacking. We were unable to obtain intact ACLs from young people. Second, we examined gene expression only, and protein levels were not examined in this study. Therefore, it remains unclear whether Stat3-activated fibroblast-like cells yielded the variation of the natural course of ACL after injury. A third limitation was that we were unable to distinguish Stat3-activated myofibroblast-like cells from Stat3-activated synovial fibroblast-like cells immunohistochemically. An in depth study of the origin and characteristics of each cell type may produce further understanding of the poor healing potential of the ACL. In conclusion, our study revealed that there is a time-dependent alteration of matrix gene expression after ACL injury. Expressions of COL1 and 3 were seen mainly in the subacute phase, and the expressions of MMP-1 and MMP-2 followed by decorin and α-SMA were seen in the chronic phase. Furthermore, Stat3-activated fibroblast-like cells also existed in injured ACL mainly in the chronic phase.
  31 in total

1.  Expression of MMPs and TIMPs family in human ACL and MCL fibroblasts.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Li Yang; Zhenyu Tang; Ruyue Xue; Yequan Wang; Ziwei Luo; Wei Huang; K L Paul Sung
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.417

2.  Characterization of transcript levels for matrix molecules and proteases in ruptured human anterior cruciate ligaments.

Authors:  Diah S Bramono; John C Richmond; Paul P Weitzel; Herman Chernoff; Ivan Martin; Vladimir Volloch; Caroline M Jakuba; Frank Diaz; Jaipal S Gandhi; David L Kaplan; Gregory H Altman
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.417

3.  Repair and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in dogs. Factors influencing long-term results.

Authors:  D H O'Donoghue; G R Frank; G L Jeter; W Johnson; J W Zeiders; R Kenyon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Induction of the cytokine signal regulator SOCS3/CIS3 as a therapeutic strategy for treating inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  T Shouda; T Yoshida; T Hanada; T Wakioka; M Oishi; K Miyoshi; S Komiya; K Kosai; Y Hanakawa; K Hashimoto; K Nagata; A Yoshimura
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The natural history of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Changes in synovial fluid cytokine and keratan sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  M Cameron; A Buchgraber; H Passler; M Vogt; E Thonar; F Fu; C H Evans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Matrix contraction by dermal fibroblasts requires transforming growth factor-beta/activin-linked kinase 5, heparan sulfate-containing proteoglycans, and MEK/ERK: insights into pathological scarring in chronic fibrotic disease.

Authors:  Yunliang Chen; Xu Shi-Wen; Jonathan van Beek; Laura Kennedy; Marilyn McLeod; Elisabetta A Renzoni; George Bou-Gharios; Sarah Wilcox-Adelman; Paul F Goetinck; Mark Eastwood; Carol M Black; David J Abraham; Andrew Leask
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Differential MMP-2 activity of ligament cells under mechanical stretch injury: an in vitro study on human ACL and MCL fibroblasts.

Authors:  David Zhou; Hwa Sung Lee; Francisco Villarreal; Annabelle Teng; Erick Lu; Shirley Reynolds; Chuan Qin; Joel Smith; K L Paul Sung
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Long-term follow-up after primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: clinical and radiological evaluation 15-23 years postoperatively.

Authors:  T Strand; A Mølster; M Hordvik; Y Krukhaug
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The SCID mouse--a novel experimental model for gene therapy in human rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  U Müller-Ladner; S Gay
Journal:  Drugs Today (Barc)       Date:  1999 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.245

10.  Patterns of gene expression in a rabbit partial anterior cruciate ligament transection model: the potential role of mechanical forces.

Authors:  Erik Attia; Haydee Brown; Ross Henshaw; Sheela George; Jo A Hannafin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  10 in total

1.  Panax notoginseng saponins promote wound repair of anterior cruciate ligament through phosphorylation of PI3K, AKT and ERK.

Authors:  Lu Yu; Jingwei Xie; Na Xin; Zhanyou Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-01-01

2.  Preservation of remnant with poor synovial coverage has no beneficial effect over remnant sacrifice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Bo Hyun Kim; Joong Il Kim; Osung Lee; Ki Woung Lee; Myung Chul Lee; Hyuk Soo Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Therapeutic potential of vascular stem cells for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Shinya Hayashi; Takahiro Niikura; Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

4.  Bio-enhanced repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Benedikt L Proffen; Jakob T Sieker; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Platelet-rich plasma pretreatment protects anterior cruciate ligament fibroblasts correlated with PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway under hypoxia condition.

Authors:  Yanwei Cao; Yue Li; Sai Chuen Fu; Jiewei Shen; Hui Zhang; Chunyan Jiang; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.889

6.  Identification of Suitable Reference Genes for Investigating Gene Expression in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury by Using Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Mariana Ferreira Leal; Diego Costa Astur; Pedro Debieux; Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Carlos Eduardo Silveira Franciozi; Leonor Casilla Loyola; Carlos Vicente Andreoli; Marília Cardoso Smith; Alberto de Castro Pochini; Benno Ejnisman; Moises Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gene expression of catabolic inflammatory cytokines peak before anabolic inflammatory cytokines after ACL injury in a preclinical model.

Authors:  Carla M Haslauer; Benedikt L Proffen; Victor M Johnson; Adele Hill; Martha M Murray
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Anterior cruciate ligament remnant cells have different potentials for cell differentiation based on their location.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Sungsin Jo; Young Lim Lee; Hyosun Park; Jun-Seob Song; Il-Hoon Sung; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Is Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Superior to the Standard Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Han Wang; Ziming Liu; Yuwan Li; Yihang Peng; Wei Xu; Ning Hu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Impact of Surgical Timing on Clinical Outcomes in Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts.

Authors:  Rikiya Baba; Eiji Kondo; Koji Iwasaki; Zenta Joutoku; Jun Onodera; Tomohiro Onodera; Tomonori Yagi; Norimasa Iwasaki; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.