Literature DB >> 23610604

Characterization of food allergies in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Jaryoung Kwon1, Jungyun Kim, Sunheui Cho, Geunwoong Noh, Sang Sun Lee.   

Abstract

We examined the characteristics of food allergy prevalence and suggested the basis of dietary guidelines for patients with food allergies and atopic dermatitis. A total of 2,417 patients were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent a skin prick test as well as serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) measurement. A double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge was conducted using milk, eggs, wheat, and soybeans, and an oral food challenge was performed using beef, pork, and chicken. Food allergy prevalence was found among 50.7% in patients with atopic dermatitis. Among patients with food allergies (n = 1,225), the prevalence of non-IgE-mediated food allergies, IgE-mediated food allergies, and mixed allergies was discovered in 94.9%, 2.2%, and 2.9% of the patients, respectively. Food allergy prevalence, according to food item, was as follows: eggs = 21.6%, milk = 20.9%, wheat = 11.8%, soybeans = 11.7%, chicken = 11.7%, pork = 8.9% and beef = 9.2%. The total number of reactions to different food items in each patient was also variable at 45.1%, 30.6%, 15.3%, 5.8%, 2.2%, and 1.0% for 1 to 6 reactions, respectively. The most commonly seen combination in patients with two food allergies was eggs and milk. The clinical severity of the reactions observed in the challenge test, in the order of most to least severe, were wheat, beef, soybeans, milk, pork, eggs, and chicken. The minimum and maximum onset times of food allergy reactions were 0.2-24 hrs for wheat, 0.5-48 hrs for beef, 1.0-24 hrs for soybeans, 0.7-24 hrs for milk, 3.0-24 hrs for pork, 0.01-72 hrs for eggs, and 3.0-72 hrs for chicken. In our study, we examined the characteristics of seven popular foods. It will be necessary, however, to study a broader range of foods for the establishment of a dietary guideline. Our results suggest that it may be helpful to identify food allergies in order to improve symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food allergy; IgE-mediated allergy; atopic dermatitis; non-IgE-mediated allergy

Year:  2013        PMID: 23610604      PMCID: PMC3627928          DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2013.7.2.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res Pract        ISSN: 1976-1457            Impact factor:   1.926


Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin most commonly diagnosed in children; however, it can occur at any age. The prevalence of AD has been increasing in Korea, at a rate of 19.7% in 1995 to 27.5% in 2000; in 2003 and 2006, the rate soared to 33.1% among elementary school children and 34.9% among preschoolers, respectively [1-3]. These rapid increases are most likely due to environmental changes, although there is a clear genetic component in AD. It has been reported that a reduced barrier function as well as an altered immune function are fundamental causes of the development of AD [4]. Food allergies (FA) arise from a specific reproducible immune response that occurs with exposure to a given food [4]. The clinical spectrum of FA ranges from mild skin irritation to severe, life-threatening anaphylaxis. Currently, avoidance of the causative agent remains as the mainstay of FA management [4,5]. Food allergic or immunologic reactions are classified into three groups, including IgE-mediated food allergies (IFAs), non-IgE-mediated food allergies (NFAs), and mixed food allergies (NFA + IFA) [6]. NFAs were slower than IFAs in onset time and primarily resulted in gastrointestinal reactions. IFAs demonstrated rapid onset, with most cases resulting in anaphylaxis or urticaria. Table 1 shows the classification of NFA and IFA patients based on skin manifestations and time of onset.
Table 1

Diagnostic characteristics of IFA and NFA reactions

1)Ramesh [6].

2)IFA, IgE-mediated food allergy.

3)NFA, non-IgE-mediated food allergy.

The majority of FAs are mediated by IgE yet, sensitization to a specific food, as confirmed by the skin prick test (SPT) or serum-specific IgE, does not always imply clinical reactivity. Accurate diagnosis of FAs should be based on an open food challenge (OFC) [7]. Because there are no specific laboratory tests for NFAs, diagnoses are made using elimination diets and oral challenges [8,9], as well food challenge tests for confirmation of the FA [10,11]. Several food challenge methods have been proposed, including double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) and OFCs [12]. In an OFC, the patient is not blinded and thus recognizes the test food. The test results are then interpreted according to the objective symptoms. If the patient displays anxiety about the challenge and complains of abdominal pain or pruritus, the food challenge test is considered invalid [13]. DBPCFC is considered to be a more accurate method for diagnosing FAs, as both the patient and the observer are blinded to the test food. This is the most rigorous method for diagnosing adverse food reactions [14]; however, it is difficult to perform DBPCFCs in a clinical setting. In Japan, 70% of all patients who required treatment for acute allergic reactions had food allergies to eggs, milk, or wheat [15]. Ellman et al. [16] reported in the U.S., allergies to eggs, milk, wheat, soy, peanuts, tree nuts, and seafood account for up to 90% of food allergies in children with AD. In Korea, the prevalence of food allergies by OFC testing among patients with AD was as follows: milk; 67.3%, chicken; 64.2%, pork; 62.8%, eggs; 61.0%, beef; 55.4%, wheat; 52.0% and soybeans; 45.2%. Little research has been conducted on these 7 specific foods that have been shown to be the primary food allergens in Korea [17]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of FAs in patients with AD. We determined the prevalence of types of food allergies, the prevalence of combinations of food allergies, the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index, and the onset time of allergic reaction in patients with AD.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

A total of 2,417 patients (M:F = 1,222:1,195) who visited either the Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology at the Seoul Allergy Clinic, Seoul, Korea or the Chungnam National University Hospital Pediatric Allergic Clinic, Daejeon, Korea between June 2000 and August 2010 were enrolled in this study (Table 2). The age groups were classified with respect to the physiological characteristics and developmental stages of infants, toddlers, children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly, as referenced by the age classification of the Korean Nutrition Society [18]. All subjects suffered from repeated eczematous reactions or exacerbations of AD. The subjects received blood tests and skin prick tests (SPTs), as described below, and fulfilled the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka [19]. Informed consent was obtained from adult patients or the parents of children participating in the study. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungnam University, Daejeon, Korea.
Table 2

Prevalence of food allergies in patients with AD and types of food allergies by age

Diagnosis of food allergy

Blood test

All subjects underwent blood tests and SPTs. Blood tests included a complete blood cell count (CBC) with differential in order to determine the eosinophilic fraction, total serum IgE levels, and food specific serum IgE levels (which were measured using UniCAP; Pharmacia & Upjohn Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Serum food-specific IgE levels less than 0.35 kU/L were classified as undetectable.

Skin prick tests

SPTs were simultaneously conducted on patients' left forearm using crude and commercial allergy extracts (Bencard, Brentford, England). Histamine hydrochloride (1 mg/ml, Bencard) was used as a positive control. SPTs using vehicles (physiologic saline, distilled water, and glycerol) were the negative controls. Reactions were read 15 min after the skin prick test and were classified as either negative (0; no reaction, +; reaction greater than the control reaction but smaller than half the size of histamine) or positive (++; half, +++; same, and ++++; twice the size of histamine). The minimum size for a positive reaction was 3 mm (+++). Food allergens (1:10 or 1:20 glycerinated food extract) that elicited a wheal at least 3 mm larger than the negative control (not including erythema) were considered to be positive, while anything less than 3 mm was considered to be negative.

Food challenge test

Diagnoses of allergies to milk, eggs, wheat, soybeans, beef, pork, and chicken were made for all subjects via food challenge tests. Among the seven foods, milk, eggs, wheat, and soybeans were tested using DBPCFCs, whereas beef, pork and chicken were tested via OFCs. Food allergies were classified as IFA, NFA, and mixed types, based on the objective symptoms, as described in Table 1.

1) Elimination diet

A trial of an elimination diet preceded the food challenge test for all 7 foods. Patients were asked to eliminate the suspected allergen according to their past history of allergic responses, skin prick tests, and specific IgE (maximum elimination phase). A replacement diet was designed in order to provide substitutes for the eliminated foods in order to maintain a balanced nutrition [17]. To confirm the complete elimination of all foods identified as allergens, all patients were required to keep dietary diaries. The analysis of dietary diaries was performed by dietitians as well as physicians. In addition, the elimination diet was implemented to the mother's diet for breast fed infants.

2) Open food challenge tests

OFCs were performed according to the following indications (challenge phase): a) obvious clinical improvement was obtained and the clinical status was stable for at least 2 weeks, and b) the allergens tested were completely eliminated from the diet. This was confirmed via the analysis of the dietary diary by a dietician. To exclude possible environmental factors, patients maintained their daily living patterns as regularly as possible during the testing period. Patients consumed one portion of the test food each morning [18]. Three days after the first challenge, the clinical results and the severity score were evaluated. If patients showed increased severity scores or obvious worsening of clinical signs or symptoms, the tests were discontinued. Otherwise, the food challenge tests continued with ingestion of increased quantities of the test food for another 4 days. If patients showed worsening symptoms, the subsequent challenges were delayed until patients recovered to the pre-challenge state. If patients consumed the food that was to be eliminated during the study, the challenge tests were ceased and the patients were observed for 1 week.

3) Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges

The recipes for DBPCFCs using eggs, milk, and soybeans were developed by dieticians at the Seoul Allergy Clinic. The vehicle used was 15 g of mixed cereal flour, consisting of brown rice flour (5 g), glutinous rice flour (5 g), and barley flour (5 g). For the DBPCFC, a 21 g mixture, consisting of 15 g of the above mixed cereal flour and 6 g of freeze-dried eggs, soybeans, or skim milk powder, was used. Foods that contained eggs, milk, and soybeans were eliminated from daily diets for at least two weeks prior to testing. Before starting the DBPCFC, it was confirmed that the patients tolerated mixed cereal flour by challenging them with the placebo for 7 days. If no symptoms were reported, patients proceeded with the DBPCFC. Two challenges, separated by a period of 7 days, were performed including one with placebo only and one with the suspected food antigen within the vehicle. Fig. 1 summarizes the diagnostic flow of the food challenge tests in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Fig. 1

Diagnostic flow for the food challenge test in patients with atopic dermatitis

Clinical severity scoring of food allergy

The clinical severity of NFA was assessed using the SCORAD index, a system used worldwide to assess the severity of atopic eczema [20]. A diagnosis of FA was made if the clinical severity score increased by > 20% in subjects demonstrating a baseline score > 50 points, or if the score increased by > 10 points for those with a baseline score ≤ 50 points. New skin lesions and itching were regarded as positive reactions, which were required for the diagnosis of FA by the food challenge test. The clinical severity of IFA was estimated using a slightly modified Clark's scoring system [21]. Positive reactions were assigned 5 points, onset times < 15 min were assigned 10 points, and onset times > 15 min were assigned five points. Clinical severity scores for IFA ranged from 10 to 30 points.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The results are expressed as means ± SD and percentages to each question.

Results

Food allergy prevalence

The prevalence of food allergies was 50.7% (1,225/2,417) in patients with AD (Table 2). Patients aged 0-11 months and over the age of 30 showed a FA prevalence of less than 50%. However, patients aged 1-29 years showed a FA prevalence from 53.8%-61.1%, which is higher than other age groups. The type of FA was classified as NFA, IFA, or mixed. The prevalence of NFA was 94.9% (1,162/1,225), IFA was 2.2% (27/1,225), and mixed was 2.9% (36/1,225). Subjects aged 65 and older were presented with only NFA, However, all other age groups showed a combination of NFA, IFA, and mixed (Table 2). The prevalence of FAs to the 7 food items tested in patients with AD were eggs; 21.6% (523/2,417), milk; 20.9% (506/2,417), wheat; 11.8% (285/2,417), soybeans; 11.7% (282/2,417), chicken; 11.7% (283/2,417), pork; 8.9% (216/2,417), and beef; 9.2% (222/2,417) (Table 3). The most prominent type of FA was NFA, however, milk and eggs more commonly caused IFA when compared to other foods. Beef did not cause IFA.
Table 3

Prevalence rates of food allergies among patients with AD by food item (N (%))

Among patients with FAs, the prevalence of allergies to the various numbers of food items is shown in Table 4. The prevalence of reactions to 1 food was 45.1% (553/1,225); to 2 foods, 30.6% (375/1,225); to 3 foods, 15.3% (187/1,225); to 4, foods was 5.8% (71/1,225) to 5 foods, 2.2% (27/1,225); and to 6 foods, 1.0% (12/1,225).
Table 4

Prevalence of food allergies to various number of food items by age (N (%))

We examined the characteristics of 2 FA combinations (Table 5), and found that 28.5% (149/523) of FA patients allergic to eggs were also allergic to milk. Likewise, 29.4% (149/506) of FA patients allergic to milk also were allergic to eggs. Patients with an allergy to one of the other 5 foods tested had a concomitant allergy for eggs or milk more frequently than other foods. For example, 43.5% (124/285) of FA patients with wheat allergy, 42.0% (119/283) with chicken allergy, 41.7% (90/216) with pork allergy, 39.2% (87/222) with beef allergy, and 38.3% (108/282) with soybean allergy also had egg allergy.
Table 5

Food allergy combinations in patients with AD (N (%))

Table 6 presents the prevalence of allergies to all 7 food items according to age. In all ages, the prevalence rates of allergy to eggs and milk were higher than that of any other foods. In particular, FA prevalence of milk in patients aged 0-5 months and 6-11 months showed a rate between 14.8-24.7%, which is the lowest rate among all age groups, whereas patients over the age of 1 year showed a FA prevalence of 37.5-55.1%. FA prevalence of soybean in patients aged 6-11 months showed 34.8% which is the highest rate among all age groups.
Table 6

Prevalence of food allergies in patients with AD by age (N (%))

Characteristics of clinical severity in the food challenge test

Severity

Table 7 shows the score differences for clinical severity during the food challenge test. The score differences were obtained by subtracting the scores of the pre-challenge test from those of the post-challenge test. The results ranked from greatest to least: wheat, beef, soybeans, milk, pork, eggs, and chicken.
Table 7

Clinical severity score and reaction onset time during challenge tests

SCORAD, scoring atopic dermatitis index.

1)Mean ± SD.

Onset time, maximum time, and minimum time to food allergy reaction

With regards to the mean onset time of the FA reaction, the shortest time to reaction was seen in wheat (6.7 ± 8.2 h), and the longest was seen in chicken (45.3 ± 22.2 h). The minimum and maximum onset time of FA reactions were different between food items: wheat (min = 0.20 h; max = 24 h), beef (0.50 h; 48 h), soybeans (1.0 h; 24 h), milk (0.70 h; 24 h), pork (3.0 h; 24 h), eggs (0.01 h; 72 h),and chicken (3.0 h; 72 h) (Table 7).

Discussion

Over the last several decades, studies involving controlled food challenges have provided a reliable scientific understanding of the role of foods in hypersensitivity reactions. Most of these investigations have focused on pediatric populations, and as a result, less evidence for adverse reactions to foods in adults has been reported. In our study, the prevalence of FAs was 50.7% (1,225/2,417) in patients with AD. We also examined changes in the prevalence of FAs by age. Less than 40% of patients aged 0-11months and over the age of 30 demonstrated FAs. This is consistent with previous reports that the prevalence of FA in infants with atopic dermatitis ranges from 30-40% [15,16,22]. Patients aged 1-29 years, however, showed a FA prevalence of more than 50%. These results are consistent with another study [23] in which the prevalence of FAs increased with age (1-18 years) in Australia, China, Taiwan, Japan, and Malaysia. Overall, food allergies tended to begin at an early age and were more frequent in children than in the adult population. Our data suggest that the prevalence of FAs gradually increases between the age of 1-2 and declines after the age of 19-29. The types of FAs were classified as NFA, IFA, or mixed. Among patients with AD, the major type of FA was NFA (94.9%, 1162/1,225), whereas IFA (2.2%, 27/1,225) and mixed (2.9%, 36/1,225) were significantly less common. Subjects older than 65 years of age were only presented with NFA; however, all other age groups showed a combination of NFA, IFA, and mixed. Eigenmann et al. [24] reported that about 35% of children with AD have IFA, as determined by DBPCFC. Additionally, some studies [25,26] have shown the FA prevalence in infants with AD to be 30%. The most common allergy, among the seven foods (milk, eggs, wheat, soybean, beef, pork, and chicken), tested in our study was eggs (21.6%), followed closely by milk (20.9%). The FA that was least frequently observed was pork (8.9%). A previous study demonstrated positive FA rates of 36.7% to egg whites, 34.8% to wheat, 31.7% to milk, and 30.4% to soybeans [27]. As determined by DBPCFC, the prevalence of specific FAs varies according to different reports. For example, the prevalence of milk allergies in patients with AD was reported to be 33.3% or 50% in two separate studies [28,29]. Likewise, the prevalence of soybean allergies was 11.7% in our study; however, this varied widely from 33.3% [28], to 28% [29], and to 3.1% [30] in other studies. Milk and eggs have been reported to be the most frequent causes for food allergies in AD, with the highest rates belonging to egg allergies [25,31-35]. NFA was overall the most common type of FA observed in our study; however, eggs and milk showed higher IFA responses compared to other foods. Interestingly, only beef did not show an IFA response, and the prevalence of FA to meat (beef, pork, and chicken) was lower than that of other foods (milk, eggs, wheat, and soybeans). Eggs and milk are often components of creamy salad dressings, pastas, whipped cream, icing, batters, and many other food preparations. As a result, many patients with these food allergies are often unable to eat baked goods. These are important allergies to be aware of, as reactions may occur immediately and range from mild to life threatening, in cases of anaphylaxis. In this study, the prevalence of milk allergy sharply increased from 1-2 years. The increase is attributed to whole milk consumption, which begins after breastfeeding or the consumption of modified milk formula. Cow's milk is usually the first food given to an infant, and cow's milk hypersensitivity is often the first symptom of an atopic condition. Cow's milk allergy often disappears before the age of 1 year. Associated reactions to other foods develop in approximately 45% of patients [36]. Among FA patients, the prevalence of 1 FA was 45.1% and 2 FAs was 30.6%. Additionally, the prevalence of more than 3 FAs was 15.3%. The food combination which showed the highest prevalence of two FAs was egg and milk in both NFA and IFA type reactions. Thus, patients with FAs have a high probability of having egg and milk allergies. The food which showed the most severe reaction and the earliest onset time was wheat. Chicken, on the other hand, had the least severe reaction and the latest onset time. In many previous studies, most of the reactions occurring during the OFC were immediate, while delayed reactions were more controversial [37,38]. In other studies, skin manifestations continued to appear up to 7 days after exposure [38,39]. Our results suggest that the management of FAs is vital for improving symptoms of AD. Over the course of the food challenge, nutritional management was required, and dietary guidelines were collectively developed by the patient, dietitian, and physician. Reactions to food items also had variable onset times and levels of severity. As our study examined only 7 common foods, further research will be necessary for the development of a more comprehensive dietary guideline.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Natural course of cow's milk allergy in childhood atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome.

Authors:  Arnold P Oranje; Albert Wolkerstorfer; Flora B de Waard-van der Spek
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.347

2.  Food and food additives in severe atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  H P Van Bever; M Docx; W J Stevens
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 13.146

3.  Appraisal of skin tests with food extracts for diagnosis of food hypersensitivity.

Authors:  S A Bock; W Y Lee; L Remigio; A Holst; C D May
Journal:  Clin Allergy       Date:  1978-11

4.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: summary of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel report.

Authors:  Joshua A Boyce; Amal Assa'ad; A Wesley Burks; Stacie M Jones; Hugh A Sampson; Robert A Wood; Marshall Plaut; Susan F Cooper; Matthew J Fenton; S Hasan Arshad; Sami L Bahna; Lisa A Beck; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Carlos A Camargo; Lawrence Eichenfield; Glenn T Furuta; Jon M Hanifin; Carol Jones; Monica Kraft; Bruce D Levy; Phil Lieberman; Stefano Luccioli; Kathleen M McCall; Lynda C Schneider; Ronald A Simon; F Estelle R Simons; Stephen J Teach; Barbara P Yawn; Julie M Schwaninger
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Atopic dermatitis and food hypersensitivity reactions.

Authors:  A W Burks; J M James; A Hiegel; G Wilson; J G Wheeler; S M Jones; N Zuerlein
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 6.  Food hypersensitivity and atopic dermatitis: pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  S H Sicherer; H A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  The frequency of food allergy in Australia and Asia.

Authors:  D J Hill; C S Hosking; C Y Zhie; R Leung; K Baratwidjaja; Y Iikura; N Iyngkaran; A Gonzalez-Andaya; L B Wah; K H Hsieh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.860

8.  Soy allergy in atopic children.

Authors:  C F Magnolfi; G Zani; L Lacava; M F Patria; M Bardare
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.347

9.  Correlations between skin prick tests using commercial extracts and fresh foods, specific IgE, and food challenges.

Authors:  F Rancé; A Juchet; F Brémont; G Dutau
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 13.146

10.  Atopic dermatitis: clinical relevance of food hypersensitivity reactions.

Authors:  A W Burks; S B Mallory; L W Williams; M A Shirrell
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Diet Modification in Atopic Dermatitis: Navigating the Complexity.

Authors:  Andrea M Rustad; Melissa A Nickles; Sara N Bilimoria; Peter A Lio
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 7.403

2.  Current status of foodservice nutrition management and effects of welfare facility support for the elderly in Cheongju City.

Authors:  Joo-Eun Lee
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 1.992

3.  Epidemiological survey of pediatric food allergy in Mashhad in Northeast Iran.

Authors:  Hamid Ahanchian; Seyedali Jafari; Fatemeh Behmanesh; Nasrinsadat Motevalli Haghi; Alireza Ataei Nakhaei; Mohammad Ali Kiani; Mohammad Hossein Radbin; Hamidreza Kianifar
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-01-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.