Literature DB >> 23609280

State-by-state variation in emergency versus elective colon resections: room for improvement.

Augustine C Obirieze1, Mehreen Kisat, Caitlin W Hicks, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Eric B Schneider, Darrell J Gaskin, Elliott R Haut, David T Efron, Edward E Cornwell, Adil H Haider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared with elective surgical procedures, emergency procedures are associated with higher cost, morbidity, and mortality. This study seeks to investigate potential state-by-state variations in the incidence of emergent versus elective colon resections.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) included in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2009 who underwent hemicolectomy (right or left) or sigmoidectomy was conducted. Discharge-level weights were applied, and generalized linear models were used to assess the odds of a patient undergoing emergent versus elective colon surgery nationally and for each state after adjusting for patient and hospital factors. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with the national average as the reference.
RESULTS: The final study cohort included 203,050 observations composed of 83,090 emergent and 119,960 elective colectomies. The state with the highest unadjusted proportion of emergent procedures was Nevada (53.6%), whereas Texas had the lowest (22.8%) [corrected]. Compared with the national average, the adjusted odds of undergoing emergency colectomy remained highest in Nevada (OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-1.87) and lowest in Texas (OR, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.51).
CONCLUSION: Substantial state variations exist in rates of emergency colon surgery within the United States. Identification of these differences suggests significant variations in practice and a potential to decrease the number of emergent colon operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23609280      PMCID: PMC3645918          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b8478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  18 in total

1.  Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Gerry A Parsons; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Elective versus emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Anderson; D Hole; C S McArdle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival.

Authors:  C S McArdle; D J Hole
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Screening for colorectal cancer reduces emergency admissions.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; M H Robinson; C M Mangham; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Emergency surgery for colonic cancer in a defined population.

Authors:  P Jestin; J Nilsson; M Heurgren; L Påhlman; B Glimelius; U Gunnarsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States.

Authors:  George N Ioannou; Michael K Chapko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Emergency surgery for colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Lane Smothers; Linda Hynan; Jason Fleming; Richard Turnage; Clifford Simmang; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery.

Authors:  Simona Ascanelli; Giuseppe Navarra; Giulia Tonini; Carlo Feo; Antonio Zerbinati; Enzo Pozza; Paolo Carcoforo
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb
View more
  3 in total

1.  Current outcomes of emergency large bowel surgery.

Authors:  H J Ng; M Yule; M Twoon; N R Binnie; E H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Burden of air leak complications in thoracic surgery estimated using a national hospital billing database.

Authors:  Andrew Yoo; Sudip K Ghosh; Walter Danker; Edmund Kassis; Iftekhar Kalsekar
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-06-29

3.  Propensity-Matched Analysis of Sigmoidectomies for Diverticular Disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Raskin; Deborah S Keller; Madhu L Gorrepati; Sylvie Akiel-Fu; Shilpa Mehendale; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.