Literature DB >> 12729359

Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery.

Simona Ascanelli1, Giuseppe Navarra, Giulia Tonini, Carlo Feo, Antonio Zerbinati, Enzo Pozza, Paolo Carcoforo.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer is associated with a higher postoperative morbidity and mortality rate and a poor long-term outcome compared with elective surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare early and late outcome after elective and emergency surgery for malignant colorectal cancer, looking for the principal determinants of a worse outcome after emergency colorectal surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 236 patients presenting with colorectal cancer over an 8-year period was undertaken. Of these, 118 presented as emergencies, whereas 118 patients, well matched for age, sex, site of tumor and TNM admitted as elective, were included in the study. Data reviewed included postoperative mortality and morbidity and long-term outcome.
RESULTS: The 30-day operative mortality rate was significantly higher in the emergency group than in the electively treated group (11.9% versus 3.4%, P < 0.01). The higher mortality rate was observed in the perforation group. The 30-day operative morbidity was higher in the emergency group (27.1% versus 12.7%, P < 0.05). Anastomotic failure was a serious complication: following primary resection, we observed 4 non-fatal (5.4%) and two fatal (2.7%) anastomotic leaks after 74 primary anastomoses. Among emergency-treated patients, the procedures characterized by the highest percentage of postoperative complications were three-stage resections (63.6%). The 5-year survival rate was greater after elective surgery (59% versus 39%).
CONCLUSIONS: The early and long-term outcome following emergency colorectal surgery was significantly lower than that after elective surgery. Although medical complications in patients with end-stage cancer played an important role, surgical failures still had an important impact on outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12729359     DOI: 10.1177/030089160308900108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  19 in total

Review 1.  Long-term outcomes after stenting as a "bridge to surgery" for the management of acute obstruction secondary to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Javier Suárez; Javier Jimenez-Pérez
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15

2.  Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes.

Authors:  Tian-Zhi Lim; Dedrick Chan; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Oncologic long-term outcomes of emergency versus elective resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joël L Lavanchy; Lukas Vaisnora; Tobias Haltmeier; Inti Zlobec; Lukas E Brügger; Daniel Candinas; Beat Schnüriger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery after stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Enomoto; Yoshihisa Saida; Kazuhiro Takabayashi; Sayaka Nagao; Emiko Takeshita; Ryohei Watanabe; Asako Takahashi; Yoichi Nakamura; Koji Asai; Manabu Watanebe; Jiro Nagao; Shinya Kusachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Psychiatric disease in surgically treated colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Vanessa P Ho; Emily Steinhagen; Kelsey Angell; Suparna M Navale; Nicholas K Schiltz; Andrew P Reimer; Elizabeth A Madigan; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction compared to surgery--a study of consecutive patients in a single institution.

Authors:  Eva Angenete; Dan Asplund; Maria Bergström; Per-Ola Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Consequences of CT colonography in stenosing colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J F Huisman; L W Leicher; E de Boer; H L van Westreenen; J W de Groot; F A Holman; P C van de Meeberg; Pejm Sallevelt; Kcmj Peeters; Mnjm Wasser; Hfa Vasen; W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Impact of emergency surgery in the outcome of rectal and left colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Claudio Coco; Alessandro Verbo; Alberto Manno; Claudio Mattana; Marcello Covino; Giorgio Pedretti; Luigi Petito; Gianluca Rizzo; Aurelio Picciocchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  State-by-state variation in emergency versus elective colon resections: room for improvement.

Authors:  Augustine C Obirieze; Mehreen Kisat; Caitlin W Hicks; Tolulope A Oyetunji; Eric B Schneider; Darrell J Gaskin; Elliott R Haut; David T Efron; Edward E Cornwell; Adil H Haider
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Identifying high-risk patients undergoing urgent and emergency surgery.

Authors:  W D Neary; C Foy; B P Heather; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.