BACKGROUND: New aspects have emerged in the clinical and diagnostic scenarios of insulinoma: current guidelines have lowered the diagnostic insulin threshold to 3 μU/ml in the presence of hypoglycemia (<55 mg/dl); post-prandial hypoglycemia has been reported as the only presenting symptom; preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) was recognized in some patients. AIM: To evaluate clinical features, diagnostic criteria and glucose metabolic profile in a monocentric series of patients affected by insulinomas including two subgroups: sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 syndrome (MEN-1). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Clinical, pathological and biochemical data regarding 33 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: following the current guidelines the 72-h fasting test was initially positive in all cases but one. In this case the test, initially negative, became positive after a 2-yr follow-up. Nadir insulin level was ≥ 3 μU/ml but <6 μU/ml in 3 patients and ≥ 6 μU/ml in the remaining 30 cases. At presentation, 27 patients (82%) reported only fasting symptoms, 3 (9%) only post-prandial and 3 (9%) both. Seven cases (21%) had previously been affected by type 2 DM or impaired glucose metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: In our series the new cut-off of insulin increased the sensitivity of the 72-h fasting test from 87% to 97%. The absence of hypoglycemia during the test cannot definitively rule out the diagnosis and the test should be repeated in every highly suspicious case. Post-prandial hypoglycemia can be the only presenting symptom. DM may be associated with the occurrence of insulinoma. So that a possible diagnosis of insulinoma must not be ignored if previous impaired glucose handling is evident.
BACKGROUND: New aspects have emerged in the clinical and diagnostic scenarios of insulinoma: current guidelines have lowered the diagnostic insulin threshold to 3 μU/ml in the presence of hypoglycemia (<55 mg/dl); post-prandial hypoglycemia has been reported as the only presenting symptom; preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM) was recognized in some patients. AIM: To evaluate clinical features, diagnostic criteria and glucose metabolic profile in a monocentric series of patients affected by insulinomas including two subgroups: sporadic and multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 syndrome (MEN-1). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Clinical, pathological and biochemical data regarding 33 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: following the current guidelines the 72-h fasting test was initially positive in all cases but one. In this case the test, initially negative, became positive after a 2-yr follow-up. Nadir insulin level was ≥ 3 μU/ml but <6 μU/ml in 3 patients and ≥ 6 μU/ml in the remaining 30 cases. At presentation, 27 patients (82%) reported only fasting symptoms, 3 (9%) only post-prandial and 3 (9%) both. Seven cases (21%) had previously been affected by type 2 DM or impaired glucose metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: In our series the new cut-off of insulin increased the sensitivity of the 72-h fasting test from 87% to 97%. The absence of hypoglycemia during the test cannot definitively rule out the diagnosis and the test should be repeated in every highly suspicious case. Post-prandial hypoglycemia can be the only presenting symptom. DM may be associated with the occurrence of insulinoma. So that a possible diagnosis of insulinoma must not be ignored if previous impaired glucose handling is evident.
Authors: M Filippella; M V Davì; G Doveri; E Lillaz; A Ciccarelli; E Massimetti; M Toaiari; M Falconi; A Colao; A Faggiano Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-04-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: M L Brandi; R F Gagel; A Angeli; J P Bilezikian; P Beck-Peccoz; C Bordi; B Conte-Devolx; A Falchetti; R G Gheri; A Libroia; C J Lips; G Lombardi; M Mannelli; F Pacini; B A Ponder; F Raue; B Skogseid; G Tamburrano; R V Thakker; N W Thompson; P Tomassetti; F Tonelli; S A Wells; S J Marx Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jeremy J Heit; Asa A Apelqvist; Xueying Gu; Monte M Winslow; Joel R Neilson; Gerald R Crabtree; Seung K Kim Journal: Nature Date: 2006-09-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Falconi; B Eriksson; G Kaltsas; D K Bartsch; J Capdevila; M Caplin; B Kos-Kudla; D Kwekkeboom; G Rindi; G Klöppel; N Reed; R Kianmanesh; R T Jensen Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Eduardo Lozano-Melendez; Mercedes Aguilar-Soto; Luis Eugenio Graniel-Palafox; Laura Elena Ceceña-Martínez; Rafael Valdez-Ortiz; Fabio Solis-Jimenez Journal: Case Rep Endocrinol Date: 2019-02-14