Literature DB >> 2360811

Increased aminoglycoside dosage requirements in hematologic malignancy.

R G Zeitany1, N S El Saghir, C R Santhosh-Kumar, M A Sigmon.   

Abstract

Aminoglycoside pharmacokinetic parameters were studied prospectively in 27 patients with an underlying hematologic malignancy and fever associated with neutropenia and in 18 control patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters and dosages were determined by linear regression analysis of a one-compartment model by the method of Sawchuk et al. (R. J. Sawchuk, D. E. Zaske, R. J. Cippolle, W. A. Wargin, and R. G. Strate, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 21:362-369, 1976). Significant differences between the study and control groups were found for aminoglycoside volume of distribution (0.40 +/- 0.1 versus 0.27 +/- 0.05 liter/kg [mean +/- standard deviation], respectively; P less than 0.0001), clearance (116.6 +/- 48.9 versus 68.6 +/- 26.7 ml/min, respectively; P less than 0.0001), half-life (2.27 +/- 0.66 versus 3.5 +/- 1.8 h, respectively; P less than 0.0001), and elimination rate constant (0.33 +/- 0.11 versus 0.24 +/- 0.09 h-1, respectively; P less than 0.001). The percentage of bone marrow blast cells (at the time of diagnosis) in patients with acute leukemia significantly correlated with increased aminoglycoside clearance (R2 = 36.98%; P = 0.0001). Patients with stage IV lymphomas (Hodgkins disease and non-Hodgkins lymphoma) had a significantly increased clearance compared with patients with lower stages of lymphomas (105.1 +/- 18.5 versus 84.1 +/- 14.9 ml/min; P = 0.014). Fever, leukocyte count, or chemotherapy, among other clinical and laboratory parameters that were studied, had no significant correlation or effect on aminoglycoside disposition. The average dose of amikacin required to maintain peak concentrations in serum above 20 micrograms/ml in patients with a hematologic malignancy was 27.5 +/- 8.43 mg/kg per day. Pharmacokinetic parameters and dosages for the control patients were comparable to general literature standards. we conclude that the dosages recommended by the manufacturers or those derived from nomograms underestimate the aminoglycoside volume of distribution and clearance in patients with a hematologic malignancy and result in suboptimal peak aminoglycoside concentrations in serum. We recommend that in febrile neutropenic patients with an underlying hematologic malignancy, amikacin be initiated at 7.5 to 10 mg/kg per dose every 8 h (2 to 2.5 mg/kg per dose every 8 h for gentamicin) and adjusted within 24 h based on individual pharmacokinetic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2360811      PMCID: PMC171677          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.5.702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  35 in total

1.  Gentamicin serum concentrations: pharmacokinetic predictions.

Authors:  J H Hull; F A Sarubbi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Why monitor serum levels of gentamicin?

Authors:  M Barza; M Lauermann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Wide interpatient variations in gentamicin dose requirements for geriatric patients.

Authors:  D E Zaske; P Irvine; L M Strand; R G Strate; R J Cipolle; J Rotschafer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Gentamicin dosing errors with four commonly used nomograms.

Authors:  T S Lesar; J C Rotschafer; L M Strand; L D Solem; D E Zaske
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Causes of death in adults with acute leukemia.

Authors:  H Y Chang; V Rodriguez; G Narboni; G P Bodey; M A Luna; E J Freireich
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  The necessity of increased doses of amikacin in burn patients.

Authors:  D E Zaske; R J Sawchuk; R G Strate
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Dosing implications of altered gentamicin disposition in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  G L Kearns; B C Hilman; J T Wilson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected infection in granulocytopenic cancer patients: a comparison between the combination of moxalactam plus amikacin and ticarcillin plus amikacin.

Authors:  C A De Jongh; J C Wade; S C Schimpff; K A Newman; R S Finley; P C Salvatore; M R Moody; H C Standiford; C L Fortner; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Increased gentamicin dosage requirements: rapid elimination in 249 gynecology patients.

Authors:  D E Zaske; R J Cipolle; R G Strate; W F Dickes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Piperacillin or ticarcillin plus amikacin. A double-blind prospective comparison of empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J C Wade; S C Schimpff; K A Newman; C L Fortner; H C Standiford; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic analysis of amikacin twice and single daily dosage in immunocompromised pediatric patients.

Authors:  N Krivoy; S Postovsky; R Elhasid; M W Ben Arush
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin in patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Dolores Santos Buelga; María del Mar Fernandez de Gatta; Emma V Herrera; Alfonso Dominguez-Gil; María José García
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults.

Authors:  M Tod; O Lortholary; D Seytre; R Semaoun; B Uzzan; L Guillevin; P Casassus; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Population pharmacokinetic study of teicoplanin in severely neutropenic patients.

Authors:  O Lortholary; M Tod; N Rizzo; C Padoin; O Biard; P Casassus; L Guillevin; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Tiphaine Goulenok; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Anna Candoni; Federica Pavan; Leonardo Pagani; Daniela Damiani; Marco Casini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in patients with malignancies.

Authors:  J S Bertino; L A Booker; P Franck; B Rybicki
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Ceftazidime with or without amikacin for the empiric treatment of localized infections in febrile, granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  I R Nováková; J P Donnelly; B E de Pauw
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.673

9.  Once daily antibiotic regimen in paediatric oncology.

Authors:  E Bouffet; C Fuhrmann; D Frappaz; D Couillioud; V Artiges; C Charra; D Bouhour; M Brunat Mentigny
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Reassessment of recommended imipenem doses in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  F Lamoth; T Buclin; C Csajka; A Pascual; T Calandra; O Marchetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.