OBJECTIVE: Abnormal prefrontal and subcortical activity during cognitive control tasks is identified in non-depressed adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD); however, little is known about the neural correlates of bipolar adolescents in a depressed state (BDd). We aimed to investigate baseline versus after-treatment patterns of neural activity underlying motor response and response inhibition in adolescents with BDd. METHODS: In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, 10 adolescents with BDd relative to 10 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) completed a well-validated go/no go block-design cognitive control task at baseline and after 6 weeks of naturalistic treatment. We used whole-brain analysis and controlled our results for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in depression scores (mean change: 57%±28). There was no behavioral difference in BDd baseline versus HC and after treatment. BDd adolescents relative to HC had higher baseline cortical, but not subcortical, neural activity (e.g., bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal during both the go [motor control] and the no go [response inhibition] conditions, and left superior temporal during the no go condition). However, after-treatment activity relative to baseline neural activity during response inhibition was significantly increased in subcortical (e.g., right hippocampus and left thalamus), but not cortical, regions. In addition, at baseline, lower left thalamus activity was correlated with higher depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with BDd had baseline prefrontal and temporal hyperactivity underlying motor control and response inhibition that did not change after treatment in contrast to relatively decreased baseline subcortical activity underlying response inhibition associated with the depressive state that was increased after the treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Abnormal prefrontal and subcortical activity during cognitive control tasks is identified in non-depressed adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD); however, little is known about the neural correlates of bipolar adolescents in a depressed state (BDd). We aimed to investigate baseline versus after-treatment patterns of neural activity underlying motor response and response inhibition in adolescents with BDd. METHODS: In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, 10 adolescents with BDd relative to 10 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) completed a well-validated go/no go block-design cognitive control task at baseline and after 6 weeks of naturalistic treatment. We used whole-brain analysis and controlled our results for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in depression scores (mean change: 57%±28). There was no behavioral difference in BDd baseline versus HC and after treatment. BDd adolescents relative to HC had higher baseline cortical, but not subcortical, neural activity (e.g., bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal during both the go [motor control] and the no go [response inhibition] conditions, and left superior temporal during the no go condition). However, after-treatment activity relative to baseline neural activity during response inhibition was significantly increased in subcortical (e.g., right hippocampus and left thalamus), but not cortical, regions. In addition, at baseline, lower left thalamus activity was correlated with higher depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with BDd had baseline prefrontal and temporal hyperactivity underlying motor control and response inhibition that did not change after treatment in contrast to relatively decreased baseline subcortical activity underlying response inhibition associated with the depressive state that was increased after the treatment.
Authors: J Kaufman; B Birmaher; D Brent; U Rao; C Flynn; P Moreci; D Williamson; N Ryan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: B Birmaher; S Khetarpal; D Brent; M Cully; L Balach; J Kaufman; S M Neer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jennifer D Townsend; Susan Y Bookheimer; Lara C Foland-Ross; Teena D Moody; Naomi I Eisenberger; Jeffrey S Fischer; Mark S Cohen; Catherine A Sugar; Lori L Altshuler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Amit Anand; Yu Li; Yang Wang; Jingwei Wu; Sujuan Gao; Lubna Bukhari; Vincent P Mathews; Andrew Kalnin; Mark J Lowe Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Hilary P Blumberg; Andrés Martin; Joan Kaufman; Hoi-Chung Leung; Pawel Skudlarski; Cheryl Lacadie; Robert K Fulbright; John C Gore; Dennis S Charney; John H Krystal; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; David E Fleck; Jeffrey Welge; James C Eliassen; Matthew Norris; Michelle Durling; Richard A Komoroski; Wen-Jang Chu; Wade Weber; Jonathan A Dudley; Thomas J Blom; Amanda Stover; Christina Klein; Jeffrey R Strawn; Melissa P DelBello; Jing-Huei Lee; Caleb M Adler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Sanne J H van Rooij; Jennifer S Stevens; Timothy D Ely; Rebecca Hinrichs; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Sterling J Winters; Yvonne E Ogbonmwan; Jaemin Shin; Nicole R Nugent; Lauren A Hudak; Barbara O Rothbaum; Kerry J Ressler; Tanja Jovanovic Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Amy S Garrett; Kiki D Chang; Manpreet K Singh; Casey C Armstrong; Patricia D Walshaw; David J Miklowitz Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 5.345
Authors: Genevieve McPhilemy; Leila Nabulsi; Liam Kilmartin; Joseph R Whittaker; Fiona M Martyn; Brian Hallahan; Colm McDonald; Kevin Murphy; Dara M Cannon Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2020-07-21
Authors: Manpreet K Singh; Akua F Nimarko; Amy S Garrett; Aaron J Gorelik; Donna J Roybal; Patricia D Walshaw; Kiki D Chang; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 8.829