Literature DB >> 23606624

Structural divergence is more extensive than sequence divergence for a family of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Wade Borcherds1, Stepan Kashtanov, Hongwei Wu, Gary W Daughdrill.   

Abstract

The p53 transactivation domain (p53TAD) is an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) domain that undergoes coupled folding and binding when interacting with partner proteins like the E3 ligase, MDM2, and the 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A, RPA70. The secondary structure and dynamics of six closely related mammalian homologues of p53TAD were investigated using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Differences in both transient secondary structure and backbone dynamics were observed for the homologues. Many of these differences were localized to the binding sites for MDM2 and RPA70. The amount of transient helical secondary structure observed for the MDM2 binding site was lower for the dog and mouse homologues, compared with human, and the amount of transient helical secondary structure observed for the RPA70 binding site was higher for guinea pig and rabbit, compared with human. Differences in the amount of transient helical secondary structure observed for the MDM2 binding site were directly related to amino acid substitutions occurring on the solvent exposed side of the amphipathic helix that forms during the p53TAD/MDM2 interaction. Differences in the amount of transient helical secondary structure were not as easily explained for the RPA70 binding site because of its extensive sequence divergence. Clustering analysis shows that the divergence in the transient secondary structure of the p53TAD homologues exceeds the amino acid sequence divergence. In contrast, strong correlations were observed between the backbone dynamics of the homologues and the sequence identity matrix, suggesting that the dynamic behavior of IDPs is a conserved evolutionary feature.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intrinsically disordered proteins; protein dynamics; structural divergence; structural evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23606624     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  5 in total

1.  Digested disorder, Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (October-November-December, 2013).

Authors:  Shelly DeForte; Krishna D Reddy; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2015-03-09

2.  Identification of Atg3 as an intrinsically disordered polypeptide yields insights into the molecular dynamics of autophagy-related proteins in yeast.

Authors:  Hana Popelka; Vladimir N Uversky; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 16.016

3.  Disorder for Dummies: Functional Mutagenesis of Transient Helical Segments in Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Gary W Daughdrill
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

Review 4.  Classification of intrinsically disordered regions and proteins.

Authors:  Robin van der Lee; Marija Buljan; Benjamin Lang; Robert J Weatheritt; Gary W Daughdrill; A Keith Dunker; Monika Fuxreiter; Julian Gough; Joerg Gsponer; David T Jones; Philip M Kim; Richard W Kriwacki; Christopher J Oldfield; Rohit V Pappu; Peter Tompa; Vladimir N Uversky; Peter E Wright; M Madan Babu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  DBC1/CCAR2 and CCAR1 Are Largely Disordered Proteins that Have Evolved from One Common Ancestor.

Authors:  Jessica Brunquell; Jia Yuan; Aqeela Erwin; Sandy D Westerheide; Bin Xue
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.