PURPOSE: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) often requires a combined epicardial and endocardial approach. An open irrigated catheter for epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia is commonly used. However, this can be associated with problems of fluid accumulation in the pericardial space necessitating repeated aspirations and interfering with catheter-tissue contact. A closed loop irrigated catheter can be a viable alternative to overcome these problems. We report our first three cases of epicardial VT ablation using a closed loop irrigated ablation catheter (Chilli II, Boston Scientific). METHODS: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia was performed via epicardial and endocardial approaches using a closed loop irrigated ablation catheter (Chilli II, Boston Scientific) and using 3-D mapping with EnSite/NavX system. Patients were routinely followed up after the catheter ablation procedure in clinic for any recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: We report our first three cases of epicardial VT ablation using a closed loop irrigated ablation catheter. Power delivery was adequate with mean power of 15.2 ± 2.8, 31.1 ± 3.8, and 25.0 ± 3.3 W, respectively, in the three patients. No impedance rises were noted during the lesion formation. There was no recurrence of VT in any of the patients after 3 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we report the first case series of epicardial VT ablation using a closed loop irrigated catheter and the EnSite/NavX mapping system. The advantages of closed irrigation, especially in conjunction with impedance-based anatomical mapping, warrant further study of its efficacy in catheter ablation from the pericardial space.
PURPOSE: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) often requires a combined epicardial and endocardial approach. An open irrigated catheter for epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia is commonly used. However, this can be associated with problems of fluid accumulation in the pericardial space necessitating repeated aspirations and interfering with catheter-tissue contact. A closed loop irrigated catheter can be a viable alternative to overcome these problems. We report our first three cases of epicardial VT ablation using a closed loop irrigated ablation catheter (Chilli II, Boston Scientific). METHODS: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia was performed via epicardial and endocardial approaches using a closed loop irrigated ablation catheter (Chilli II, Boston Scientific) and using 3-D mapping with EnSite/NavX system. Patients were routinely followed up after the catheter ablation procedure in clinic for any recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: We report our first three cases of epicardial VT ablation using a closed loop irrigated ablation catheter. Power delivery was adequate with mean power of 15.2 ± 2.8, 31.1 ± 3.8, and 25.0 ± 3.3 W, respectively, in the three patients. No impedance rises were noted during the lesion formation. There was no recurrence of VT in any of the patients after 3 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, we report the first case series of epicardial VT ablation using a closed loop irrigated catheter and the EnSite/NavX mapping system. The advantages of closed irrigation, especially in conjunction with impedance-based anatomical mapping, warrant further study of its efficacy in catheter ablation from the pericardial space.
Authors: André d'Avila; Christopher Houghtaling; Paulo Gutierrez; Olivera Vragovic; Jeremy N Ruskin; Mark E Josephson; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joshua M Cooper; John L Sapp; Usha Tedrow; Christine P Pellegrini; David Robinson; Laurence M Epstein; William G Stevenson Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Vivek Y Reddy; Dipen Shah; Josef Kautzner; Boris Schmidt; Nadir Saoudi; Claudia Herrera; Pierre Jaïs; Gerhard Hindricks; Petr Peichl; Aude Yulzari; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Karl-Heinz Kuck Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: H Nakagawa; W S Yamanashi; J V Pitha; M Arruda; X Wang; K Ohtomo; K J Beckman; J H McClelland; R Lazzara; W M Jackman Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-04-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; John L Sapp; Andrew P Selwyn; Gregory Couper; Laurence M Epstein Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hildegard Tanner; Gerhard Hindricks; Marius Volkmer; Steve Furniss; Volker Kühlkamp; Dominique Lacroix; Christian DE Chillou; Jesús Almendral; Domenico Caponi; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Hans Kottkamp Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2009-07-28
Authors: David J Wilber; Carlo Pappone; Petr Neuzil; Angelo De Paola; Frank Marchlinski; Andrea Natale; Laurent Macle; Emile G Daoud; Hugh Calkins; Burr Hall; Vivek Reddy; Giuseppe Augello; Matthew R Reynolds; Chandan Vinekar; Christine Y Liu; Scott M Berry; Donald A Berry Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 56.272