Literature DB >> 23604601

CORR Insights®: Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.

David J Deehan1, Paul N Baker.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23604601      PMCID： PMC3676582          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-013-2986-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  David J Deehan; James D Murray; Paul D Birdsall; Ian M Pinder
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  When do patient-reported assessments peak after revision knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Karen Bettinson; Steven M Kurtz; David J Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Reason for revision influences early patient outcomes after aseptic knee revision.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Paul Cowling; Steven Kurtz; Simon Jameson; Paul Gregg; David Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Aseptic versus septic revision total knee arthroplasty: patient satisfaction, outcome and quality of life improvement.

Authors:  Nilesh Patil; Kevin Lee; James I Huddleston; Alex H S Harris; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.199
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.