RATIONALE: Drug-addicted individuals show automatic approach tendencies towards drug-related cues, i.e., an approach bias (ApB). Nevertheless, little is known about ApB in tobacco smokers and about the presence of ApB after smoking abstinence. OBJECTIVES: We investigated ApB to smoking cues in heavy tobacco smokers versus never-smokers and studied its relation to smoking characteristics and craving. Second, we compared ApBs of heavy smokers with biases of abstinent heavy smokers. METHOD:A group of current heavy smokers (n = 24), ex-smokers who were abstinent for at least 5 years (n = 20), and never-smokers (n = 20) took part in the experiment. An indirect smoking approach avoidance task was performed, in which participants were required to respond to pictures of smoking and neutral cues by pulling (approach) or pushing (avoid) on a joystick, according to the content-irrelevant format of the picture (landscape or portrait). Craving scores were examined using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges. RESULTS:Heavy smokers showed an ApB for smoking cues compared to ex-smokers and never-smokers, which correlated positively to craving scores. There were no group differences in ApB scores for ex-smokers and never-smokers. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ApBs for smoking cues are present in heavy smokers and decrease after long-term successful smoking cessation.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Drug-addicted individuals show automatic approach tendencies towards drug-related cues, i.e., an approach bias (ApB). Nevertheless, little is known about ApB in tobacco smokers and about the presence of ApB after smoking abstinence. OBJECTIVES: We investigated ApB to smoking cues in heavy tobacco smokers versus never-smokers and studied its relation to smoking characteristics and craving. Second, we compared ApBs of heavy smokers with biases of abstinent heavy smokers. METHOD: A group of current heavy smokers (n = 24), ex-smokers who were abstinent for at least 5 years (n = 20), and never-smokers (n = 20) took part in the experiment. An indirect smoking approach avoidance task was performed, in which participants were required to respond to pictures of smoking and neutral cues by pulling (approach) or pushing (avoid) on a joystick, according to the content-irrelevant format of the picture (landscape or portrait). Craving scores were examined using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges. RESULTS: Heavy smokers showed an ApB for smoking cues compared to ex-smokers and never-smokers, which correlated positively to craving scores. There were no group differences in ApB scores for ex-smokers and never-smokers. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ApBs for smoking cues are present in heavy smokers and decrease after long-term successful smoking cessation.
Authors: Carolin Eberl; Reinout W Wiers; Steffen Pawelczack; Mike Rinck; Eni S Becker; Johannes Lindenmeyer Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 6.464
Authors: Jin H Yoon; Stephen T Higgins; Matthew P Bradstreet; Gary J Badger; Colleen S Thomas Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Elizabeth A Cabrera; Corinde E Wiers; Elsa Lindgren; Gregg Miller; Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; Aurelija Slapin; Robert Oum; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Corinde E Wiers; Elizabeth A Cabrera; Dardo Tomasi; Christopher T Wong; Şükrü B Demiral; Sung Won Kim; Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Corinde E Wiers; Christine Stelzel; Soyoung Q Park; Christiane K Gawron; Vera U Ludwig; Stefan Gutwinski; Andreas Heinz; Johannes Lindenmeyer; Reinout W Wiers; Henrik Walter; Felix Bermpohl Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 7.853