Literature DB >> 23603368

Hospital costs for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Pétur Reynisson1, Jan Persson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare robot-assisted laparoscopy and laparotomy for radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in terms of hospital costs.
METHODS: Consecutive women undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy as a sole procedure between January 2001 and February 2012 were included. We compared OR times, hospital stay, procedure specific costs, blood transfusions and cost for readmissions and re-interventions until three months after surgery for 231 women operated who received either an open (n=51) or a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (n=180). The hospital internal charges and purchase costs were used for estimation. The specific robotic cost was based on an investment depreciation time of seven years, with 400 operations performed annually, costs for maintenance, robotic instruments, robot-specific assistant's instruments and robot draping.
RESULTS: The estimated mean costs for an open radical hysterectomy was $12,986, for the first 30 robotic radical hysterectomies was $18,382, and for the last 30 was $12,759, with a break even in cost after 90 robotic procedures. The specific robot costs ($3469) was, for the last robot cohort, compensated mainly by an average of 22 min shorter OR time and 4.9 days shorter hospital stay.
CONCLUSION: Given 400 robot operations annually, and only after a substantial implementation period, it is feasible to perform robot-assisted radical hysterectomy at an equal hospital cost compared with open surgery.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23603368     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Liselotte Mettler; Nicolai Maass; Johannes Ackermann
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Health care cost consequences of using robot technology for hysterectomy: a register-based study of consecutive patients during 2006-2013.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkilde Laursen; Vibe Bolvig Hyldgård; Pernille Tine Jensen; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-10

3.  Surgical Care for Women with Endometrial Cancer in Florida.

Authors:  Osayande Osagiede; Christopher C DeStephano; Jordan J Cochuyt; Dorin T Colibaseanu; Matthew A Robertson; Aaron C Spaulding
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2019-05-29

4.  Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Hongqian Liu; DongHao Lu; Therese Dowswell; Huan Song; Lei Wang; Gang Shi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-15

5.  Impact of robotic surgery on patient flow and resource use intensity in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jeremie Abitbol; Beste Kucukyazici; Sonya Brin; Susie Lau; Shannon Salvador; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Roy Kessous; Liron Kogan; John D Fletcher; Valerie Pare-Miron; Gilbert Liu; Walter H Gotlieb
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Hee Jung Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  The learning curves of robotic and three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Li; Dan-Feng Du; Hua Jiang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 8.  A systematic review about costing methodology in robotic surgery: evidence for low quality in most of the studies.

Authors:  Malene Korsholm; Jan Sørensen; Ole Mogensen; Chunsen Wu; Kamilla Karlsen; Pernille T Jensen
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2018-09-07

9.  Comparative health technology assessment of robotic-assisted, direct manual laparoscopic and open surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Turchetti; Francesca Pierotti; Ilaria Palla; Stefania Manetti; Cinzia Freschi; Vincenzo Ferrari; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Chan Nie; An-Qi Yan; Xi-Shi Liu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.