Literature DB >> 35927390

Impact of robotic surgery on patient flow and resource use intensity in ovarian cancer.

Jeremie Abitbol1,2, Beste Kucukyazici3, Sonya Brin1, Susie Lau1, Shannon Salvador1, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar4, Roy Kessous1, Liron Kogan1, John D Fletcher5, Valerie Pare-Miron1, Gilbert Liu6, Walter H Gotlieb7.   

Abstract

There is an emerging focus on the role of robotic surgery in ovarian cancer. To date, the operational and cost implications of the procedure remain unknown. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of integrating minimally invasive robotic surgery on patient flow, resource utilization, and hospital costs associated with the treatment of ovarian cancer during the in-hospital and post-discharge processes. 261 patients operated for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer between January 2006 and November 2014 at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital were included in this study. Outcomes were compared by surgical approach (robotic vs. open surgery) as well as pre- and post-implementation of the robotics platform for use in ovarian cancer. The in-hospital patient flow and number of emergency room visits within 3 months of surgery were evaluated using multi-state Markov models and generalized linear regression models, respectively. Robotic surgery cases were associated with lower rates of postoperative complications, resulted in a more expedited postoperative patient flow (e.g., shorter time in the recovery room, ICU, and inpatient ward), and were between $10,376 and $7,421 less expensive than the average laparotomy, depending on whether or not depreciation and amortization of the robotic platform were included. After discharge, patients who underwent robotic surgery were less likely to return to the ER (IRR 0.42, p = 0.02, and IRR 0.47, p = 0.055, in the univariate and multivariable models, respectively). With appropriate use of the technology, the addition of robotics to the medical armamentarium for the management of ovarian cancer, when clinically feasible, can bring about operational efficiencies and entails cost savings.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost effectiveness; Health economics; Healthcare operations management; Ovarian cancer; Quality of care; Robotic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927390     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01447-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  41 in total

1.  Patient time costs associated with cancer care.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; William W Davis; Elizabeth B Lamont; Angela Fahey; Marie Topor; Martin L Brown; Joan L Warren
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Medical costs and outcomes for Australian women with ovarian cancer: a patient-level analysis over 2.5 years.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; Paul A Scuffham; Vanessa L Beesley; Adèle C Green; Anna DeFazio; David K Wyld; Alexandra M Clavarino; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  The Cost of Initial Care for Medicare Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Renata R Urban; Hao He; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Melissa M Hardesty; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Healthcare utilization in women after abdominal surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ruth McCorkle; Sangchoon Jeon; Elizabeth Ercolano; Peter Schwartz
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases.

Authors:  Pamela J Paley; Dan S Veljovich; Chirag A Shah; Elise N Everett; Amy E Bondurant; Charles W Drescher; William A Peters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Minimizing pain medication use and its associated costs following robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeremie Abitbol; Rebecca Cohn; Sandra Hunter; Marcelo Rombaldi; Eva Cohen; Roy Kessous; Nick Large; Ari Reiss; Susie Lau; Shannon Salvador; Walter H Gotlieb
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Quality of life among women after surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dena Schulman-Green; Elizabeth Ercolano; Michael Dowd; Peter Schwartz; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2008-09

8.  Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

Authors:  Maria C Bell; Jenny Torgerson; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden; Allison Wierda Suttle; Sharon Hunt
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Cost of Care for the Initial Management of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra S Bercow; Ling Chen; Sudeshna Chatterjee; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; William M Burke; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Treatment patterns, health care utilization, and costs of ovarian cancer in Central and Eastern Europe using a Delphi panel based on a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Kun Kim; Emma Hernlund; Zoltán Hernadi; János Révész; Imre Pete; András Szánthó; Lubomir Bodnar; Rodoslaw Madry; Agnieszka Timorek-Lemieszczuk; Tatjana Bozanovic; Suzana Vasovic; Zorica Tomasevic; Milica Zivaljevic; Vladimir Pazin; Tomáš Minárik; Hana Garanová; Lýdia Helpianska; Nahila Justo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.