Literature DB >> 23602492

Is there a relation between number of adjustments and results after gastric banding?

Ruben Schouten1, Gerhard van 't Hof, Pierre B Feskens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a standard restrictive bariatric procedure. Previous studies have shown that patients lost to follow-up do worse than patients who remain in follow-up. However, it is unknown if this is purely because of a lack of band adjustments. The aim of this study was to study the relation between number of adjustments and results.
METHODS: Patients who underwent primary LAGB from October 2006 until March 2009 were included. The following parameters were collected: demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative weight, preoperative and postoperative status of co-morbidities, type of band, short- and long-term complications, reoperations, date, number and volume of adjustments, total amount of inserted volume, and last measured volume.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients underwent primary LAGB. Twelve patients did not attend follow-up visits after 24 months (8.1%). Mean follow-up was 46 months, and excess weight loss, 47%. Eleven patients (8.1%) developed long-term complications, and 12 patients (8.8%) underwent revisional surgery. Patients underwent a mean number of 5 adjustments with a range of 0 to 18. The mean volume of totally inserted milliliters was 8 mL, with a range of 0 to 14 mL. There was a strong positive relation between number of adjustments and weight loss as well as reduction in obesity-related co-morbidities (r = .22; P<.01). There was no significant relation between number of adjustments and complications or revisional surgery.
CONCLUSION: There is a strong relation between the number of band adjustments and weight loss, whereas complications and reoperations seem to be independent of the number of adjustments. A continual and lifelong follow-up of LAGB patients, including regular band volume adjustments, is necessary.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjustments; Band volume; Gastric banding; Results

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23602492     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  5 in total

1.  Primordial Influence of Post-operative Compliance on Weight Loss After Adolescent Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding.

Authors:  Naziha Khen-Dunlop; Myriam Dabbas; Gianpaolo De Filippo; Jean-Philippe Jais; Erik Hervieux; Caroline Télion; Jean-Marc Chevallier; Jean-Luc Michel; Yves Aigrain; Pierre Bougnères; Olivier Goulet; Yann Révillon
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Evaluation of pre- and postoperative physical activity participation in laparoscopic gastric banding patients.

Authors:  Matthew G Browning; Nancy G Baugh; Luke G Wolfe; John K Kellum; James W Maher; Ronald K Evans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: 4-year experience and learning curve.

Authors:  Georgios Papadimitriou; Konstantinos Vardas; Konstantinos Alfaras; Panagiotis Alfaras
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Organization of future training in bariatric gastroenterology.

Authors:  Timothy R Koch; Timothy R Shope; Christopher J Gostout
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Is it possible to improve long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding with appropriate patient selection?

Authors:  Michał Orłowski; Michał Janik; Paula Franczak; Agata Frask; Maciej Michalik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.195

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.