BACKGROUND: The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation (RFCA) for spontaneous dissociated pulmonary vein activity (DPV-spike) after PV isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS:One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF referred for RFCA were enrolled. When DPV-spike was documented after PVI, we randomly assigned these patients to receive additional RFCA for DPV-spike or only PVI. We divided them into 4 groups: 87 patients without DPV-spike after PVI (No-spike group), 31 without DPV-spike after additional RFCA (Successful group), 8 with remaining DPV-spike after additional RFCA (Unsuccessful group), and 26 with DPV-spike after only PVI (Spike group). AF recurrence was evaluated among the 4 groups. RESULTS: After PVI, DPV-spike was documented in 87 PVs (14%) from 65 patients. During 16 ± 9 months of follow-up, the incidence of the freedom from AF was significantly higher in the No-spike group than that in the Spike group and Unsuccessful group (P < 0.05), and tended to be higher in the Successful group than that in the Spike group and Unsuccessful group (P = 0.08 and 0.11, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, the remaining PV-spike after ablation was an independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 2.44; CI 1.10-5.43, P < 0.05). No major complications including PV stenosis were observed during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:DPV-spike after PVI may be associated with higher electrical activity within the PVs and may be one of the risk factors for AF recurrence. Additional RFCA for DPV-spike was effective to reduce the AF recurrence after PVI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation (RFCA) for spontaneous dissociated pulmonary vein activity (DPV-spike) after PV isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF referred for RFCA were enrolled. When DPV-spike was documented after PVI, we randomly assigned these patients to receive additional RFCA for DPV-spike or only PVI. We divided them into 4 groups: 87 patients without DPV-spike after PVI (No-spike group), 31 without DPV-spike after additional RFCA (Successful group), 8 with remaining DPV-spike after additional RFCA (Unsuccessful group), and 26 with DPV-spike after only PVI (Spike group). AF recurrence was evaluated among the 4 groups. RESULTS: After PVI, DPV-spike was documented in 87 PVs (14%) from 65 patients. During 16 ± 9 months of follow-up, the incidence of the freedom from AF was significantly higher in the No-spike group than that in the Spike group and Unsuccessful group (P < 0.05), and tended to be higher in the Successful group than that in the Spike group and Unsuccessful group (P = 0.08 and 0.11, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, the remaining PV-spike after ablation was an independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 2.44; CI 1.10-5.43, P < 0.05). No major complications including PV stenosis were observed during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:DPV-spike after PVI may be associated with higher electrical activity within the PVs and may be one of the risk factors for AF recurrence. Additional RFCA for DPV-spike was effective to reduce the AF recurrence after PVI.
Authors: Cristina Tutuianu; Vassil Traykov; Gábor Bencsik; Gergely Klausz; László Sághy; Robert Pap Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Ka Hou Christien Li; Tian Sang; Cheng Chan; Mengqi Gong; Yingzhi Liu; Aaron Jesuthasan; Guangping Li; Tong Liu; Michael H S Lam; William Kk Wu; Matthew T V Chan; Fang-Zhou Liu; Cheng Chen; Jeffery Ho; Yunlong Xia; Gary Tse Journal: Heart Asia Date: 2019-08-14