Literature DB >> 23599704

Effects of acetate-free citrate dialysate on glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products in hemodialysis patients.

Atsumi Masuda1, Shinji Hagiwara, Mitsuo Tanimoto, Fumiko Kodama, Kozue Okumura, Nao Nohara, Mayumi Matsumoto, Masayuki Maiguma, Keisuke Omote, Hiroaki Io, Atsushi Kurusu, Isao Ohsawa, Yoshio Shimizu, Chieko Hamada, Satoshi Horikoshi, Yasuhiko Tomino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous studies have shown the presence of high levels of glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products in association with atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Acetates are commonly used buffer for correcting metabolic acidosis in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Since the toxic effects of acetates are well established, acetate-free citrate dialysate (AFD) has become available in Japan. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the suppressive effects of AFD on oxidative stress in maintenance HD patients by measuring plasma pentosidine and malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) levels as markers for glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products.
METHODS: Plasma pentosidine, MDA-LDL and other laboratory parameters were examined on maintenance HD at the Juntendo University Hospital before and after switching to AFD.
RESULTS: MDA-LDL levels divided by LDL cholesterol were significantly lower than those before switching to AFD. Furthermore, levels of plasma pentosidine were lower than those before switching to AFD. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the percent change of the calcium-phosphorus product in the nondiabetic group and that of phosphorus in the diabetic group were predictive variables for the percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL, whereas the percent change of log high-sensitive C-reactive protein and that of systolic blood pressure in the nondiabetic group and that of diastolic blood pressure in the diabetic group were predictive variables for the percent change of plasma pentosidine.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that AFD decreases glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products when compared with acid citrate dextrose in HD patients. The reduction of oxidative stress by AFD during HD may have possible beneficial effects on atherosclerosis through calcium-phosphorus metabolism and blood pressure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetate-free dialysate; Atherosclerosis; Hemodialysis; Malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein; Pentosidine

Year:  2012        PMID: 23599704      PMCID: PMC3567873          DOI: 10.1159/000342258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron Extra        ISSN: 1664-5529


Introduction

Previous studies have shown that the presence of high levels of glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products is associated with atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus (DM) and aging [1,2,3,4]. Increased levels of these products have been well documented in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [5,6]. Sakata et al. [7] and Yamamoto et al. [8] demonstrated that glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation may promote the development of vascular complications, particularly atherosclerosis in patients with ESKD. Cardiovascular complications are the principal cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ESKD who require hemodialysis (HD). Plasma pentosidine is a major glycoxidation product formed under oxidative conditions. Several studies have demonstrated the increased concentrations of pentosidine in the tissues and plasma of uremic patients [9]. Malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) is an end product of lipid peroxidation and may be involved in the early stages of atherosclerotic lesion progression. In addition, it is a useful biomarker of atherosclerosis [10,11]. A conventional dialysate, an acetate-containing sodium bicarbonate solution, is currently used for standard HD in Japan. However, acetate-induced adverse effects such as arterial hypotension, depressed left ventricular function and increased incidences of nausea, vomiting and headache have been reported in numerous studies [12,13]. Previous studies demonstrated that acetate promotes vascular damage and leads to the aforementioned adverse effects [12,14]. Recently, acetate-free citrate dialysate (AFD) has become available in Japan. The objective of the present study in maintenance HD patients was to evaluate the beneficial effects of AFD on clinical parameters and to determine the attenuating effects of AFD on the glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products by measuring plasma pentosidine and MDA-LDL levels.

Methods

Patient Characteristics

Fifty-nine patients on maintenance HD at the Juntendo University Hospital (39 males and 20 females; mean age 64 ± 1.7 years) participated in this study. The hospital ethics committee of the Juntendo University approved the study and informed consent was obtained from the patients enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in table 1. Their mean age was 64 ± 1.7 years and mean duration of HD therapy was 7.8 ± 0.8 years.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics at the start of the study

Age, years64 ± 1.7
Gender (male/female)39/20
Duration of dialysis, years7.8 ± 0.8
Body height, cm160.5 ± 1.2
Body weight, kg52.5 ± 1.5
Cause of kidney failure, n
 Glomerulonephritis16
 Diabetes mellitus14
 Nephrosclerosis13
 Polycystic kidney disease5
 Other11

Dialysate

Before the study, acetate-containing dialysate was used in all patients at a flow rate of 500 ml/min from a central supply system, and then they were switched to AFD (Carbostar®, Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The composition of AFD was as follows: sodium 140 mEq/l, potassium 2.0 mEq/l, calcium 3.0 mEq/l, magnesium 1.0 mEq/l, chloride 111 mEq/l, bicarbonate 35 mEq/l and citrate 2.0 mEq/l. Conventional acid citrate dextrose composition was as follows: sodium 143 mEq/l, potassium 2.0 mEq/l, calcium 2.5 mEq/l, magnesium 1.0 mEq/l, chloride 112 mEq/l, bicarbonate 27.5 mEq/l (mmol/l) and acetate 11 mEq/l. With the exception of the amounts of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and iron supplements, dialysis prescriptions did not change after switching to AFD.

Laboratory Parameters

Five blood samples were obtained from each patient, i.e. at the start of AFD (baseline) and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after switching to AFD. All samples were collected from the arterial line at the start of the HD session at the beginning of the week. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum total protein, serum albumin, serum lipids [LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride] and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were measured using standard laboratory protocols of the Juntendo University Hospital. Plasma pentosidine and serum MDA-LDL levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (plasma pentosidine, Fushimi Pharmaceutical, Kagawa, Japan; MDA-LDL, Sekisui Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). MDA-LDL levels divided by LDL cholesterol (MDA-LDL/LDL-C) were calculated as an indicator of the extent of LDL cholesterol oxidation. Moreover, the percent change of each parameter at 12 months after switching to AFD from baseline was calculated. Additionally, all patients were divided into a non-DM (NDM) group or a DM group, and the two groups were compared. As a validated indicator of subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness, the measurements of carotid intima media thickness, ankle brachial pressure index and pulse wave velocity were examined at two points, namely, before and after switching to AFD using standard protocols of the Juntendo University Hospital. The measurements for each parameter were averaged to obtain the mean value.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Statistical analyses were performed using Stat View software for Windows. Comparisons between more than two groups of patients were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Fisher's test. First, correlation of the percent change of plasma pentosidine and MDA-LDL levels with that of other laboratory parameters was determined by single linear univariate analysis. Variables with a p value of <0.10 were then analyzed using a stepwise multivariate regression analysis on the basis of a forward-backward procedure. A logarithmic transformation of hs-CRP and triglyceride was used to render the normal distribution for parametric tests. The F value for entry or removal of candidate variables from discriminant function was set at 4.0. A p value <0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Blood Pressure

The blood pressure data are shown in table 2. There were no significant differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, pulse pressure and mean blood pressure at the beginning of the dialysis session and after switching to AFD. Figure 1 shows changes in the systolic blood pressure gap, defined as post-dialysis systolic pressure minus pre-dialysis systolic pressure for a single HD session. There was no statistically significant change in the levels of the systolic pressure gap after switching to AFD. Moreover, the diastolic blood pressure gap during the HD session did not change with AFD (data not shown).
Table 2

Blood pressure parameters

At startAfter
1 month3 months6 months12 months
At beginning of dialysis
Systolic BP, mm Hg156 ± 3.5152 ± 2.9157 ± 2.6153 ± 3.3153 ± 3.1
Diastolic BP, mm Hg78 ± 2.176 ± 1.878 ± 1.477 ± 1.776 ± 1.5
Pulse pressure, mm Hg79.4 ± 2.377.7 ± 2.280.0 ± 2.176.6 ± 2.678.3 ± 2.5
Mean BP, mm Hg104.0 ± 2.3101.4 ± 1.9104.4 ± 1.6102.3 ± 2.0102.3 ± 1.8

At completion of dialysis
Systolic BP, mm Hg148 ± 3.3145 ± 3.4145 ± 3.1142 ± 3.0149 ± 3.2
Diastolic BP, mm Hg78 ± 1.777 ± 2.077 ± 1.775 ± 1.6*75 ± 1.7
Pulse pressure, mm Hg70.7 ± 2.668.7 ± 2.469.5 ± 2.468.4 ± 2.675.0 ± 3.0
Mean BP, mm Hg101.9 ± 1.9100.0 ± 2.399.9 ± 1.997.5 ± 1.8*100.2 ± 1.7

BP = Blood pressure.

p < 0.05 vs. at start.

Fig. 1

Change in systolic blood pressure during HD sessions [Δ systolic blood pressure = (systolic blood pressure at the completion of HD) – (systolic blood pressure at the start of HD)]. No significant differences were observed during the study.

Biological Parameters

The biological parameters are listed in table 3. The level of plasma triglyceride at 6 months after switching to AFD was significantly increased from 100.4 ± 9.4 to 125.1 ± 12.8 mg/dl (p < 0.05). However, no significant change was observed at 12 months after switching to AFD. Non-HDL cholesterol level at 12 months after switching to AFD was significantly increased from 108.1 ± 4.3 to 120.4 ± 4.1 mg/dl (p < 0.05). In addition, LDL cholesterol levels at 3 and 6 months after switching to AFD were significantly increased from 79.2 ± 3.2 to 92.2 ± 4.2 mg/dl (p < 0.05) and then to 89.3 ± 3.8 mg/dl (p < 0.05). Levels of plasma sodium were significantly decreased after switching to AFD (baseline, 141.0 ± 0.4 mEq/l; 1 month, 139.0 ± 0.3 mEq/l (p < 0.001); 3 months, 139.0 ± 0.4 mEq/l (p < 0.001); 6 months, 139.0 ± 0.3 mEq/l (p < 0.05), and 12 months, 140.0 ± 0.4 mEq/l (p < 0.05). The level of serum urea nitrogen at 12 months after switching to AFD was significantly decreased from 66.5 ± 1.9 to 61.2 ± 2.1 mg/dl (p < 0.05). The levels of corrected calcium were significantly increased and those of phosphorus significantly decreased at 12 months after switching to AFD. There were no significant changes in the levels of serum creatinine, albumin, HDL cholesterol, hs-CRP or potassium levels after switching to AFD. The efficacy of dialysis calculated by Kt/V was evaluated, although no significant change in efficacy after switching to AFD was observed. Compared with NDM patients, DM patients had higher plasma triglyceride but lower hs-CRP at 12 months after switching to AFD, but there were no significant changes in the percent change of each parameter (table 4).
Table 3

Biochemical parameters

At startAfter
1 month3 months6 months12 months
Creatinine, mg/dl11.2 ± 0.311.3 ± 0.311.2 ± 0.311.1 ± 0.311.1 ± 0.3
SUN, mg/dl66.5 ± 1.967.3 ± 2.068.0 ± 2.366.7 ± 2.261.2 ± 2.1*
Non-HDL cholesterol, mg/dl108.1 ± 4.3115.0 ± 5.4124.0 ± 6.8119.1 ± 4.5120.4 ± 4.1*
TG, mg/dl100.4 ± 9.4104.9 ± 9.8104.3 ± 9.5125.1 ± 12.8*117.4 ± 11.9
HDL cholesterol, mg/dl45.8 ± 1.745.0 ± 2.545.3 ± 2.147.3 ± 2.047.5 ± 1.6
LDL cholesterol, mg/dl79.2 ± 3.287.3 ± 4.792.2 ± 4.2*85.3 ± 3.789.8 ± 3.8*
Total protein, g/dl6.5 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.16.5 ± 0.16.6 ± 0.1*6.6 ± 0.1
Albumin, g/dl3.9 ± 0.13.8 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.1
hs-CRP, mg/dl0.336 ± 0.1740.466 ± 0.2210.410 ± 0.2420.409 ± 0.1700.406 ± 0.208
Sodium, mEq/l141 ± 0.4139 ± 0.3**139 ± 0.4**139 ± 0.3*140 ± 0.4*
Potassium, mEq/l5.1 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.15.2 ± 0.15.1 ± 0.15.0 ± 0.1
Corrected calcium, mg/dl9.4 ± 0.19.4 ± 0.19.5 ± 0.19.5 ± 0.19.6 ± 0.1*
Phosphorus, mg/dl5.2 ± 0.25.0 ± 0.25.2 ± 0.25.4 ± 0.24.9 ± 0.1*
Ca × P, mg2/dl248.8 ± 1.6147.5 ± 1.5248.9 ± 1.4551.2 ± 1.5046.9 ± 1.06
Kt/V urea1.39 ± 0.031.42 ± 0.031.38 ± 0.041.40 ± 0.031.37 ± 0.03

Non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were analyzed by the two-sided t test. SUN = Serum urea nitrogen; TG = triglyceride.

p < 0.05 vs. at start.

p < 0.0001 vs. at start.

Table 4

Comparison of the characteristics between nondiabetic and diabetic HD patients

At start
p valueAfter 12 months
p value% change from baseline
p value
nondiabeticdiabeticnondiabeticdiabeticnondiabeticdiabetic
MDA-LDL/LDL (U·dl/mg·l)1.232 ± 0.0551.324 ± 0.0830.39971.005 ± 0.0450.980 ± 0.0790.7974−11.3 ± 5.7−16.7 ± 9.50.6692
Pentosidine, μg/dl0.539 ± 0.0310.461 ± 0.0750.26200.369 ± 0.0250.300 ± 0.0510.2136−29.4 ± 2.617.6 ± 9.20.0913
TG, mg/dl98.7 ± 7.6116.6 ± 17.10.2805102.2 ± 9.0162.7 ± 25.10.007213.2 ± 9.252.3 ± 23.90.0754
Albumin, g/dl3.8 ± 0.14.0 ± 0.10.11253.9 ± 0.14.1 ± 0.10.07031.5 ± 1.11.0 ± 1.50.8533
hs-CRP, mg/dl0.387 ± 0.1960.385 ± 0.1750.99650.480 ± 0.2580.097 ± 0.0610.449098.6 ± 56.2−19.8 ± 18.50.2851
Corrected calcium, mg/dl9.5 ± 0.19.3 ± 0.10.28739.7 ± 0.19.1 ± 0.30.013429.2 ± 10.4−9.0 ± 23.10.1075
Phosphorus, mg/dl5.3 ± 0.25.1 ± 0.40.75944.9 ± 0.14.7 ± 0.30.4095−2.4 ± 3.1−6.2 ± 6.60.5894
Ca × P, mg2/dl249.6 ± 1.747.7 ± 3.20.578747.9 ± 1.043.2 ± 3.00.07030.6 ± 3.2−6.5 ± 8.10.3412
PH7.368 ± 0.0067.380 ± 0.0060.27887.371 ± 0.0077.376 ± 0.0080.71630.008 ± 0.075−0.05 ± 0.1030.7030
HCO3, mmol/l22.3 ± 0.622.4 ± 0.50.905622.4 ± 0.521.8 ± 0.60.5292−0.1 ± 2.5−3.6 ± 3.90.4947
Systolic BP, mm Hg152.4 ± 3.4158.0 ± 8.30.4606151.7 ± 3.6158.8 ± 6.00.3449−0.2 ± 2.3−0.5 ± 5.60.9616
Diastolic BP, mm Hg75.2 ± 1.976.5 ± 5.80.782474.8 ± 1.779.9 ± 3.30.16010.1 ± 2.2−1.3 ± 5.20.7630
Hemoglobin, g/dl10.5 ± 0.110.5 ± 0.30.992710.6 ± 0.211.2 ± 0.30.1085−0.3 ± 1.65.6 ± 2.70.0846
Hematocrit, %32.8 ± 0.432.4 ± 1.00.588132.7 ± 0.534.0 ± 0.90.2398−0.6 ± 1.55.9 ± 3.00.0507
IMT, mm0.87 ± 0.030.92 ± 0.050.35680.86 ± 0.020.90 ± 0.030.2755−0.1 ± 1.9−0.1 ± 4.20.9904
PWV, cm/s1,741 ± 551,742 ± 1480.98681,751 ± 651,676 ± 990.56751.3 ± 2.54.1 ± 3.70.5759
ABI1.22 ± 0.031.14 ± 0.070.46701.22 ± 0.031.18 ± 0.080.61253.1 ± 2.4−0.3 ± 2.90.4678

TG = Triglyceride; BP = blood pressure; IMT = intima media thickness; ABI = ankle brachial pressure index; PWV = pulse wave velocity.

Acidosis

The pH level at the beginning of the HD session at 6 months after switching to AFD was significantly increased from 7.372 ± 0.005 to 7.387 ± 0.005 (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the pH levels at baseline and at 12 months (table 5). There was no significant change in bicarbonate levels after switching to AFD. Other parameters also did not change significantly.
Table 5

Data on arterial blood gas

At startAfter
1 month3 months6 months12 months
pH7.37 ± 0.017.38 ± 0.017.37 ± 0.017.39 ± 0.00*7.34 ± 0.01
PCO2, mm Hg40.0 ± 0.840.0 ± 0.540.4 ± 0.639.2 ± 0.538.9 ± 0.6
PO2, mm Hg101.0 ± 3.299.9 ± 3.0106.0 ± 2.6103.2 ± 3.094.2 ± 2.7*
HCO3, mmol/l22.7 ± 0.522.9 ± 0.423.0 ± 0.423.1 ± 0.422.2 ± 0.4
Anion gap13.8 ± 0.513.3 ± 2.715.7 ± 0.415.1 ± 0.516.3 ± 0.5

p < 0.05 vs. at start.

Management of Renal Anemia and Metabolism of Iron

As shown in tables 6 and 7, the new dialysate did not affect the levels of hematocrit, hemoglobin, iron and ferritin, or the dose of recombinant human erythropoietin and iron supplements with the exception of darbepoetin alfa dosage, which was increased from 80.0 ± 15.1 to 101.7 ± 17.8 U/month and then to 113.9 ± 19.7 U/month at 6 and 12 months after switching to AFD. The total iron binding capacity at 6 months after switching to AFD was increased from 252 ± 6.5 to 264 ± 6.3 μg/dl.
Table 6

Parameters assessing hemoglobin, hematocrit and iron stores

At startAfter
1 month3 months6 months12 months
Hemoglobin, g/dl10.5 ± 0.110.4 ± 0.110.6 ± 0.110.6 ± 0.210.7 ± 0.1
Hematocrit, %32.8 ± 0.432.2 ± 0.533.1 ± 0.533.0 ± 0.533.0 ± 0.4
Iron, μg/dl60.8 ± 3.064.3 ± 3.561.5 ± 3.257.8 ± 3.361.6 ± 3.7
TIBC, μg/dl252 ± 6.5252 ± 6.0255 ± 5.8264 ± 6.3*258 ± 5.7
Ferritin, ng/ml174 ± 21.9164 ± 20.5160 ± 20.2174 ± 26.5142 ± 19.8

p < 0.05 vs. at start. TIBC = Total iron-binding capacity.

Table 7

Data on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron supplement dosage

At startAfter
1 month3 months6 months12 months
rHuEPO dosage, U/month18,666 ± 4,49419,000 ± 4,41620,000 ± 3,70824,000 ± 3,96923,111 ± 4,712
Darbepoetin alfa dosage, U/month80.0 ± 15.188.3 ± 18.186.4 ± 16.3101.7 ± 17.8*113.9 ± 19.7*
Iron supplement dosage, mg/month60.0 ± 11.343.3 ± 10.456.7 ± 11.236.7 ± 10.936.7 ± 9.8

Three patients did not take any erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (other patients took rHuEPO or darbepoetin alfa). rHuEPO = Recombinant human erythropoietin.

p < 0.05 vs. at start.

Markers of Glycoxidation and Lipid Peroxidation Products

Plasma pentosidine levels at 3, 6 and 12 months after switching to AFD were significantly decreased from 0.505 ± 0.031 to 0.415 ± 0.026 μg/ml (p < 0.0001), to 0.449 ± 0.028 μg/ml (p < 0.0001) and then to 0.358 ± 0.023 μg/ml (p < 0.0001) (fig. 2). Furthermore, MDA-LDL/LDL-C levels at 6 and 12 months after switching to AFD were significantly decreased from 1.254 ± 0.046 to 1.075 ± 0.065 U · dl/mg · l (p < 0.05) and then to 1.000 ± 0.039 U · dl/mg · l (p < 0.0001) (fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Plasma pentosidine levels decreased significantly from 0.505 ± 0.031 to 0.415 ± 0.026 μg/ml at 3 months, 0.449 ± 0.028 μg/ml at 6 months, and 0.358 ± 0.023 μg/ml at 12 months. NS = Not significant.

Fig. 3

Serum MDA-LDL/LDL-C levels decreased significantly from 1.254 ± 0.046 to 1.075 ± 0.065 U · dl/mg · l (48.5 ± 1.78 to 41.6 ± 2.51 U/mmol) at 6 months and then to 1.000 ± 0.039 U · dl/mg · l (38.7 ± 1.51 U/mmol) at 12 months. NS = Not significant.

Correlation between Glycoxidation or Lipid Peroxidation Products and Each Parameter

Single linear univariate analysis (table 8) showed that the percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL was correlated positively with that of phosphorus (r = 0.339, p = 0.0401) and the calcium-phosphorus product (Ca × P; r = 0.336, p = 0.0261). The percent change of plasma pentosidine was correlated negatively with that of log hs-CRP (r = −0.351, p = 0.0359) and positively with that of systolic blood pressure (r = 0.390, p = 0.0186) in the nondiabetic group. In the diabetic group, the percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL was correlated positively with that of phosphorus (r = 0.663, p = 0.0516) and Ca × P (r = 0.640, p = 0.0637). The percent change of plasma pentosidine was correlated negatively with that of systolic blood pressure (r = −0.597, p = 0.0687) and diastolic blood pressure (r = −0.7171, p = 0.0197). Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the percent change of Ca × P in the nondiabetic group and that of phosphorus in the diabetic group were predictive variables for the percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL, whereas the percent change of log hs-CRP and that of systolic blood pressure in the nondiabetic group and that of diastolic blood pressure in the diabetic group were predictive variables for the percent change of plasma pentosidine (table 9).
Table 8

Single univariate linear correlation of percent change of factors associated with percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL-C and pentosidine levels in nondiabetic and diabetic groups

Nondiabetic
Diabetic
MDA-LDL/LDL-C
pentosidine
MDA-LDL/LDL-C
pentosidine
rp valuerp valuerp valuerp value
log TG−0.1510.37110.1400.4139−0.0110.9778−0.3480.3244
Albumin0.1550.35870.1830.28490.5090.1614−0.0510.8894
log hs-CRP0.0670.6926−0.3510.03590.2950.4413−0.4780.1625
Corrected calcium0.0450.7893−0.0340.84520.2360.5405−0.1990.5818
Phosphorus0.3390.0401−0.0200.91010.6630.05160.2560.4754
Ca × P0.3360.0261−0.0260.88080.6400.06370.1650.6479
PH−0.0570.74690.0640.7193−0.0670.8642−0.2290.5249
HCO3−0.0590.7341−0.0550.7531−0.1490.70140.1130.7556
Systolic BP0.1610.34210.3900.01860.1340.7308−0.5970.0687
Diastolic BP0.1070.5362−0.0130.9390−0.1710.6609−0.7170.0197
Hemoglobin−0.2460.14280.0120.7772−0.2490.5185−0.3770.2825
Hematocrit−0.2230.18490.0120.9448−0.3600.3411−0.4430.2001
IMT−0.0380.83560.0320.8639−0.3260.39260.1200.7415
PWV0.2010.30600.0570.77580.5520.1986−0.4190.3017
ABI0.1640.41250.2650.19030.4070.3653−0.1880.6550

BP = Blood pressure; TG = triglyceride.

Table 9

Stepwise multiple regression analysis of factors associated with percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL and pentosidine in nondiabetic and diabetic groups

B valuesF values
Nondiabetic
MDA-LDA/LDL
 Phosphorus−0.0210.015
 Ca × P0.3665.398
Pentosidine
 log hs-CRP−0.3535.677
 Systolic BP0.3927.015

Diabetic
MDA-LDA/LDL
 Phosphorus0.6635.489
 Ca × P−0.0130.001
Pentosidine
 Diastolic BP−0.7178.455
 Systolic BP0.1450.15

BP = Blood pressure.

Discussion

In this study, we clarified the clinical effects of the removal of acetate from dialysate using an AFD that was developed in Japan. Until recently, acetates have been used for many years as buffer in conventional dialysates. However, it is well known that acetates lead to acetate intolerance such as arterial hypotension, nausea, vomiting, headache and decreased left ventricular function [15]. Furthermore, Stenvinkel et al. [16] reported that HD patients often experience malnutrition, inflammation, atherosclerosis (MIA syndrome) and increased oxidative stress. This study demonstrated the suppressive effects of AFD on glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products in HD patients. Acetate is considered to be one of the bioincompatible factors along with the purity and quality of the dialysis solutions or dialysis membrane type. Use of this bioincompatible dialysis system results in the increased production of free radical or reactive oxygen species (ROS). Todeschini et al. [17] reported limited elevation in superoxide production by neutrophils during acetate-free biofiltration compared to bicarbonate dialysis. Carozzi et al. [18] reported that acetate may induce monocyte activation and cytokine production. Furthermore, Higuchi et al. [19] reported that cytokine production was minimal during acetate-free biofiltration. In view of these findings, we hypothesize that absence of acetate may contribute to the decreases in plasma pentosidine and MDA-LDL/LDL which are indicators of glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products in the presence of oxidative stress. Our results indicate that AFD reduced the production of oxygen free radicals and inflammatory cytokines, which in turn contributed to a possible improvement in the progression of atherosclerosis. Various studies have reported that the increases in oxidative stress and micro-inflammation are associated with increased atherosclerosis, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [20,21,22]. Zhou et al. [23] reported that serum pentosidine was associated with arterial stiffness in HD patients. Generally, DM is characterized by higher levels of oxidative stress. The existence of increased oxidative stress is based on decreased antioxidant capacity in DM along with chronic exposure to increased levels of ROS and increased glycoxidation and peroxidation. Nevertheless, plasma pentosidine, MDA-LDL/LDL levels and other laboratory parameters were not significantly changed in patients with or without DM in this study. Previous studies demonstrated similar results in that no significant difference was found in serum pentosidine level, a marker of glycoxidation, in ESKD patients with or without DM [24]. We consider that diabetic patients receiving HD are consistently exposed to not only hyperglycemia but also uremic status, malnutrition, micro-inflammation and aging which causes oxidative stress in comparison to diabetic patients without renal complications. By the stepwise multiple regression analysis (table 9), our study demonstrated a correlation between the percent change of plasma pentosidine and that of blood pressure and hs-CRP, and between the percent change of MDA-LDL/LDL and that of calcium-phosphorus metabolism in patients with or without DM. Several studies have described the relationship between elevation of calcium-phosphorus metabolism and vascular calcification or high-mortality risk in ESKD patients [25,26,27]. Dalfino et al. [28] reported that oxidative stress could increase the secretion of bone morphogenetic protein-2, a member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily. Furthermore, they showed that increase in bone morphogenetic protein-2 had a direct effect on vascular smooth muscle cells and regulated vascular calcification through increased phosphorus uptake. Another study demonstrated that elevation of phosphorus levels causes endothelial dysfunction and inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production. This occurred through increased ROS production and endothelial NO synthase inactivation via protein kinase C, resulting in impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation [29]. Thus, our result shows that the reduction of oxidative stress by AFD during HD may have possible beneficial effects on atherosclerosis through calcium-phosphorus metabolism and blood pressure. Moreover, we investigated data of carotid intima media thickness, pulse wave velocity and ankle brachial pressure index, as indicators of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness but no significant differences were observed. This may be due to a short 12-month study period and to the fact that such long-term observation is required to examine the effects on atherosclerosis and subsequent mortality. Blood analysis showed that the pH, bicarbonate and anion gap levels were similar before and after switching to AFD. This finding indicates that acetate-free citrate-buffered dialysis fluids correct metabolic acidosis safely following proper replacement of the acetate-containing dialysate. Biochemical parameters such as corrected calcium increased significantly, and phosphorus levels decreased significantly at 12 months after replacement with AFD. In this study, the new dialysate concentration of calcium was increased from 2.5 to 3.0 mEq/l, and this change is considered reasonable and appropriate. No other obvious side effects or adverse events were observed with switching to AFD. We observed no significant differences in the intradialytic blood pressure measured throughout the study. However, several reports showed that acetate-free renal replacement therapy had beneficial effects on intradialytic hypotension compared with acetate-containing therapies [30,31]. Acetates may induce the production of cytokines and NO, a vasodilator that can cause intradialytic cardiovascular instability [12,30]. Possible reasons for the different finding may be that there were few previous episodes of intradialytic hypotension, and blood pressure was well-controlled in our patient group. Alternatively, it is possible that our data may have been influenced by factors other than dialysate composition, such as administration of anti-hypertensive drugs, differences in dry weight or seasonal variations. It was therefore difficult to objectively interpret our findings. Beneficial effects of AFD on anemia associated with renal replacement therapy have been reported in several studies [31,32]. However, our data provides conflicting results from previous reports, since the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent requirement tended to rise, while the intravenous dosage of iron supplement decreased. It was proposed that beneficial effects of AFD on anemia were attributable to the addition of citrate, which has a local anticoagulation effect that inhibits clotting. Maintenance of an effective membrane surface area throughout dialysis may lead to an increase in dialysis efficacy [33]. Other reasons why acetates cause oxidative stress and micro-inflammation, which induces malnutrition and anemia, have also been reported [32]. The precise reasons for the discrepancy between our results and those of earlier studies are unknown. In this study, the type of dialyser, duration of dialysis, dialysate and blood flow remained unchanged throughout the study. The baseline state of anemia was well-controlled in our study group, but it is possible that potential iron deficiency may have affected our results. Limitations of this study were that the investigation was single arm and not randomized. The treatment duration was relatively short. Furthermore, the majority of participant conditions were well-controlled in terms of anemia, nutrition status, blood pressure and balance of body fluids. A multi-center, randomized trial should be considered in the future. It appears that HD treatment with AFD decreases glycoxidation and lipid peroxidation products compared with conventional acetate-containing dialysate. The reduction of oxidative stress by AFD during HD may have possible beneficial effects on atherosclerosis through calcium-phosphorus metabolism or blood pressure.
  33 in total

Review 1.  Lipoxidation products as biomarkers of oxidative damage to proteins during lipid peroxidation reactions.

Authors:  J R Requena; M X Fu; M U Ahmed; A J Jenkins; T J Lyons; S R Thorpe
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Effects of acetate on energy metabolism and function in the isolated perfused rat heart.

Authors:  A D Jacob; N Elkins; O K Reiss; L Chan; J I Shapiro
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Effect of hemodialysis on the oxidative stress and antioxidants.

Authors:  Evrim Dursun; Tomris Ozben; Gültekin Süleymanlar; Belda Dursun; Gülsen Yakupoglu
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  A comparison of bicarbonate hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, and acetate-free biofiltration on cytokine production.

Authors:  Terumi Higuchi; Chii Yamamoto; Tsutomu Kuno; Kazuyoshi Okada; Masayoshi Soma; Noboru Fukuda; Yuji Nagura; Susumu Takahashi; Koichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Ther Apher Dial       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.762

5.  Increased efficiency of hemodialysis with citrate dialysate: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Robert J Kossmann; Annette Gonzales; Robin Callan; Suhail Ahmad
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Strong association between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  P Stenvinkel; O Heimbürger; F Paultre; U Diczfalusy; T Wang; L Berglund; T Jogestrand
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Effect of vitamin E on lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis in ESRD patients.

Authors:  M Mune; S Yukawa; M Kishino; H Otani; K Kimura; O Nishikawa; T Takahashi; N Kodama; Y Saika; Y Yamada
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.545

8.  Transient increase in plasma oxidized LDL during the progression of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice.

Authors:  Rina Kato; Chihiro Mori; Keiko Kitazato; Satoru Arata; Takashi Obama; Masahiro Mori; Katsuhiko Takahashi; Toshihiro Aiuchi; Tatsuya Takano; Hiroyuki Itabe
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 8.311

9.  Effect of acetate-free biofiltration and bicarbonate hemodialysis on neutrophil activation.

Authors:  Marta Todeschini; Daniela Macconi; Nuria García Fernández; Marina Ghilardi; Agostina Anabaya; Elena Binda; Marina Morigi; Dario Cattaneo; Elena Perticucci; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Marina Noris
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Acetate free biofiltration. Effects on peripheral blood monocyte activation and cytokine release.

Authors:  S Carozzi; M G Nasini; P M Caviglia; C Schelotto; O Santoni; M Atti
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.872

View more
  6 in total

1.  Citrate high volume on-line hemodiafiltration modulates serum Interleukin-6 and Klotho levels: the multicenter randomized controlled study "Hephaestus".

Authors:  Francesco Pizzarelli; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Vincenzo Panichi; Alessandro Toccafondi; Giuseppe Ferro; Serena Farruggio; Elena Grossini; Pietro Claudio Dattolo; Vincenzo Miniello; Massimiliano Migliori; Cristina Grimaldi; Aldo Casani; Maurizio Borzumati; Stefano Cusinato; Alessandro Capitanini; Alessandro Quercia; Oliviero Filiberti; Lucia Dani
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Citric acid-based bicarbonate dialysate attenuates aortic arch calcification in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Akiyama; Takahito Moriyama; Norio Hanafusa; Yutaka Miura; Momoko Seki; Yusuke Ushio; Kentaro Kawasoe; Yoei Miyabe; Kazunori Karasawa; Hidekazu Sugiura; Keiko Uchida; Masayuki Okazaki; Mizuki Komatsu; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Makoto Kuro-O; Kosaku Nitta; Junichi Hoshino
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.393

3.  Increasing the Magnesium Concentration in Various Dialysate Solutions Differentially Modulates Oxidative Stress in a Human Monocyte Cell Line.

Authors:  Carmen Vida; Julia Carracedo; Patricia de Sequera; Guillermo Bodega; Rafael Pérez; Matilde Alique; Rafael Ramírez
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15

4.  A high magnesium concentration in citrate dialysate prevents oxidative stress and damage in human monocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Carmen Vida; Julia Carracedo; Patricia de Sequera; Guillermo Bodega; Rafael Pérez; Matilde Alique; Rafael Ramírez
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2020-08-30

5.  The effect of citrate dialysate on intradialytic heparin dose in haemodialysis patients: study design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Davina J Tai; Kelvin Leung; Pietro Ravani; Robert R Quinn; Nairne Scott-Douglas; Jennifer M MacRae
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  An acetate switch regulates stress erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Min Xu; Jason S Nagati; Jian Xie; Jiwen Li; Holly Walters; Young-Ah Moon; Robert D Gerard; Chou-Long Huang; Sarah A Comerford; Robert E Hammer; Jay D Horton; Rui Chen; Joseph A Garcia
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 53.440

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.