Literature DB >> 23599218

Assessment of gustatory responses to different sugars in harnessed and free-moving bumblebee workers (Bombus terrestris).

Veerle Mommaerts1, Felix Wäckers, Guy Smagghe.   

Abstract

For bumblebee colony survival, sugar responses are crucial as nectar is the main carbohydrate source and flower choice is likely determined by sugar composition. This study used a bioassay both with harnessed and with free-moving workers of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris to study the gustatory response to the 3 major plant sugars by both groups. In harnessed workers of B. terrestris, a concentration of 5.5% of fructose and glucose was required to induce the proboscis extension reflex in 50% of the workers, whereas for sucrose, a much higher concentration of 40% was needed. In contrast, free-moving workers given a choice between 30% glucose, 30% sucrose, 30% fructose, and water showed a strong preference for sucrose (66% of individuals) compared with 18% for glucose and 16% for fructose; water was never chosen. Familiarization with 30% fructose provoked a significant increase in preference toward fructose, indicating plasticity. In addition, by amputation of the tarsi, it was found that tarsi plays a role in the sugar response with especially the foreleg tarsi being involved in the response to fructose. Our results demonstrated that sugar response is different in free-moving versus harnessed bumblebee workers and that tarsi plays a role in sugar perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus terrestris; harnessed bumblebees; plant sugars; sugar response; tarsi; taste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23599218     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjt014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  9 in total

1.  The mechanics of nectar offloading in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and implications for optimal concentrations during nectar foraging.

Authors:  Jonathan G Pattrick; Hamish A Symington; Walter Federle; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health.

Authors:  Valerie N Martin; Robert N Schaeffer; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Bumblebees are not deterred by ecologically relevant concentrations of nectar toxins.

Authors:  Erin Jo Tiedeken; Jane C Stout; Philip C Stevenson; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  A Novel Behavioral Assay to Investigate Gustatory Responses of Individual, Freely-moving Bumble Bees (Bombus terrestris).

Authors:  Carolyn Ma; Sébastien Kessler; Alexander Simpson; Geraldine Wright
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Nectar yeasts in the tall Larkspur Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae) and effects on components of pollinator foraging behavior.

Authors:  Robert N Schaeffer; Cody R Phillips; M Catherine Duryea; Jonathan Andicoechea; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sugar alcohols have the potential as bee-safe baits for the common wasp.

Authors:  Stefanie Neupert; Jennifer M Jandt; Paul Szyszka
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.462

7.  Elevated Temperature May Affect Nectar Microbes, Nectar Sugars, and Bumble Bee Foraging Preference.

Authors:  Kaleigh A Russell; Quinn S McFrederick
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.192

8.  An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: Nectar, pollen, and operative force.

Authors:  Emily J Bailes; Jonathan G Pattrick; Beverley J Glover
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Using Nectar-Related Traits to Enhance Crop-Pollinator Interactions.

Authors:  Jarrad R Prasifka; Rachel E Mallinger; Zoe M Portlas; Brent S Hulke; Karen K Fugate; Travis Paradis; Marshall E Hampton; Clay J Carter
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.753

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.