IMPORTANCE: Medicaid beneficiaries by definition are low income but they are not necessarily a homogeneous group. No study has assessed differences and disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries with head and neck cancers. OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors of treatment receipt and mortality among Medicaid patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Medicaid claims linked with cancer registry data for 2 states, California and Georgia, for the years 2002 through 2006. SETTING: Inpatient and ambulatory care. PARTICIPANTS: Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18 to 64 years diagnosed as having head and neck cancer (N = 1308) were included. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models analyzed the likelihood of treatment receipt and survival. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Receipt of treatment and 12- and 24-month mortality. RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of Medicaid patients with cancer received a diagnosis at an early stage. Overall, black patients were less likely to get surgical treatment and more likely to die than white patients, even after controlling for demographics, stage at diagnosis, and tumor site. Older age and disability status also increased 12-month mortality. Patients in California, who were alive for at least 12 months, have approximately half the odds of dying within 24 months compared with those in Georgia. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Concrete steps should be taken to address the significant racial disparities observed in head and neck cancer outcomes among Medicaid beneficiaries. Further research is needed to explore the state-level policies and attributes to examine the startling differences in mortality among the state Medicaid programs analyzed in this study. Pooled comparisons of Medicaid beneficiaries with individuals covered by other types of insurance could mask important disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries, which need to be acknowledged and addressed to improve outcomes for these low-income patients with head and neck cancer.
IMPORTANCE: Medicaid beneficiaries by definition are low income but they are not necessarily a homogeneous group. No study has assessed differences and disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries with head and neck cancers. OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors of treatment receipt and mortality among Medicaid patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Medicaid claims linked with cancer registry data for 2 states, California and Georgia, for the years 2002 through 2006. SETTING: Inpatient and ambulatory care. PARTICIPANTS: Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18 to 64 years diagnosed as having head and neck cancer (N = 1308) were included. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models analyzed the likelihood of treatment receipt and survival. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Receipt of treatment and 12- and 24-month mortality. RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of Medicaid patients with cancer received a diagnosis at an early stage. Overall, black patients were less likely to get surgical treatment and more likely to die than white patients, even after controlling for demographics, stage at diagnosis, and tumor site. Older age and disability status also increased 12-month mortality. Patients in California, who were alive for at least 12 months, have approximately half the odds of dying within 24 months compared with those in Georgia. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Concrete steps should be taken to address the significant racial disparities observed in head and neck cancer outcomes among Medicaid beneficiaries. Further research is needed to explore the state-level policies and attributes to examine the startling differences in mortality among the state Medicaid programs analyzed in this study. Pooled comparisons of Medicaid beneficiaries with individuals covered by other types of insurance could mask important disparities among Medicaid beneficiaries, which need to be acknowledged and addressed to improve outcomes for these low-income patients with head and neck cancer.
Authors: Nicholas K Schiltz; Siran M Koroukian; Mendel E Singer; Thomas E Love; Kitti Kaiboriboon Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Turner Osler; Laurent G Glance; Wenjun Li; Jeffery S Buzas; Megan L Wetzel; David W Hosmer Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Aaron J Dawes; Rachel Louie; David K Nguyen; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Punam Parikh; Susan L Ettner; Clifford Y Ko; David S Zingmond Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jennifer A Schlichting; Nitin A Pagedar; Catherine Chioreso; Charles F Lynch; Mary E Charlton Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Sonam Sharma; Justin Bekelman; Alexander Lin; J Nicholas Lukens; Benjamin R Roman; Nandita Mitra; Samuel Swisher-McClure Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Dan P Zandberg; Sandy Liu; Olga Goloubeva; Robert Ord; Scott E Strome; Mohan Suntharalingam; Rodney Taylor; Robert E Morales; Jeffrey S Wolf; Ann Zimrin; Joshua E Lubek; Lisa M Schumaker; Kevin J Cullen Journal: Head Neck Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Nicholas R Lenze; Douglas Farquhar; Siddharth Sheth; Jose P Zevallos; Jeffrey Blumberg; Catherine Lumley; Samip Patel; Trevor Hackman; Mark C Weissler; Wendell G Yarbrough; Adam M Zanation; Andrew F Olshan Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Jingxuan Zhao; Michael T Halpern; Ana Maria Lopez; Leon Bernal-Mizrachi; Anderson B Collier; Joan Neuner; Jonathan Phillips; William Blackstock; Manali Patel Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 13.506