Literature DB >> 23598549

Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars.

Ricardo Wathson Feitosa de Carvalho1, Roberto Carlos Arruda de Araújo Filho, Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Estimating the difficulty of removing third molars is a common dilemma. However, the estimation of the difficulty associated with maxillary third molar surgery has not yet been defined. The aim of the present study was to determine the degree of difficulty and identify predictor variables associated with the occurrence of difficulty in the removal of impacted maxillary third molars.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out involving patients who underwent at least 1 surgical removal of an impacted maxillary third molar at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University of Pernambuco (Pernambuco, Brazil). Predictor variables indicative of surgical difficulty were classified by their demographic, clinical, and radiographic aspects. Degree of surgical difficulty was categorized as low, moderate, or high based on the surgical technique used. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed.
RESULTS: In total, 106 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and 204 surgeries were performed. Patients' mean age was 22.8 ± 2.2 years and the proportion of women to men was 3:1. Approximately 20% of patients were overweight. Surgical difficulty was generally low and 5 variables were significantly associated with the occurrence of a high degree of surgical difficulty.
CONCLUSION: Surgical difficulty during the removal of impacted maxillary third molars is generally low. However, for cases with a high degree of difficulty, identification of predictor variables may be useful for students and inexperienced clinicians to consider the decision not to execute the procedure, thus avoiding complications that often require complex management.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23598549     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of impacted and partially impacted lower third molars with panoramic radiography compared to MRI-a proof of principle study.

Authors:  Barbara Kirnbauer; Norbert Jakse; Petra Rugani; Michael Schwaiger; Marton Magyar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Evaluation of Third Molar Impaction Distribution and Patterns in a Sample of Lebanese Population.

Authors:  Christian Khouri; Georges Aoun; Carlos Khouri; Maria Saade; Ziad Salameh; Antoine Berberi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-16

3.  RANGE OF MOUTH OPENING AMONG THREE MAJOR ETHNIC GROUPS IN NIGERIA.

Authors:  O O Gbolahan; B B Osinaike; C I Udoye; O W Olawole
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2019-12

4.  Selected toxic and essential heavy metals in impacted teeth and the surrounding mandibular bones of people exposed to heavy metals in the environment.

Authors:  Piotr Malara; Agnieszka Fischer; Beata Malara
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Yun-Hoa Jung; Bong-Hae Cho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-12-17

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of impacted maxillary third molars: A cone-beam computed tomographic study of the position and depth of impaction.

Authors:  Priscila Ferreira de Andrade; Jesca Neftali Nogueira Silva; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Karina Lopes Devito; Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.