Literature DB >> 23598361

Predicting and detecting reciprocity between indirect ecological interactions and evolution.

James A Estes1, Justin S Brashares, Mary E Power.   

Abstract

Living nature can be thought of as a tapestry, defined not only by its constituent parts but also by how these parts are woven together. The weaving of this tapestry is a metaphor for species interactions, which can be divided into three broad classes: competitive, mutualistic, and consumptive. Direct interactions link together as more complex networks, for example, the joining of consumptive interactions into food webs. Food web dynamics are driven, in turn, by changes in the abundances of web members, whose numbers or biomass respond to bottom-up (resource limitation) and top-down (consumer limitation) forcing. The relative strengths of top-down and bottom-up forcing on the abundance of a given web member depend on its ecological context, including its topological position within the food web. Top-down effects by diverse consumers are nearly ubiquitous, in many cases influencing the structure and operation of ecosystems. While the ecological effects of such interactions are well known, far less is known of their evolutionary consequences. In this essay, we describe sundry consequences of these interaction chains on species and ecosystem processes, explain several known or suspected evolutionary effects of consumer-induced interaction chains, and identify areas where reciprocity between ecology and evolution involving the indirect effects of consumer-prey interaction chains might be further explored.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23598361     DOI: 10.1086/668120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  4 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the Black Queen Hypothesis.

Authors:  Alix Mas; Shahrad Jamshidi; Yvan Lagadeuc; Damien Eveillard; Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Does intraspecific competition promote variation? A test via synthesis.

Authors:  Andrew W Jones; David M Post
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Migratory herds of wildebeests and zebras indirectly affect calf survival of giraffes.

Authors:  Derek E Lee; Bernard M Kissui; Yustina A Kiwango; Monica L Bond
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Southeast Alaskan kelp forests: inferences of process from large-scale patterns of variation in space and time.

Authors:  Torrey R Gorra; Sabrina C R Garcia; Michael R Langhans; Umihiko Hoshijima; James A Estes; Pete T Raimondi; M Tim Tinker; Michael C Kenner; Kristy J Kroeker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.