Literature DB >> 23597838

Electrode montage dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on semantic fluency.

Barbara Penolazzi1, Massimiliano Pastore, Sara Mondini.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has proved to be valuable in improving many language processes. However, its influence on verbal fluency still needs to be fully proved. In the present study, we explored the effects of different electrode montages on a semantic fluency task, aimed at comparing their effectiveness in affecting language production. Ninety healthy, right-handed volunteers were randomly assigned to receive one of the following stimulation protocols: (1) anode over the left frontal cortex/cathode over the right supraorbital (rSO) area, (2) anode over the left fronto-temporal (lFT) cortex/cathode over the rSO area, (3) anode over the lFT cortex/cathode over the right FT cortex, (4) anode over the lFT cortex/big-size cathode over the rSO area, (5) sham. In the active stimulation conditions, 2 mA current was delivered for 20 min. Participants performed the semantic fluency task before the stimulation, immediately after it, and 15 min after the first post-stimulation task. Although none of the different protocols improved language production immediately after the stimulation, anodal stimulation over the left frontal cortex (standard-size cathode over the rSO area) improved fluency at the second post-stimulation task. This proved that small differences in either active electrode positioning, or reference positioning/size can impact tDCS behavioral effects also in the cognitive domain. These findings, which can be sometimes missed when tested immediately after the stimulation only, add new information on tDCS spatial and temporal features, thus providing new indications to increase the effectiveness of stimulation protocols.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597838     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Davide Francesco Stramaccia; Barbara Penolazzi; Giulia Sartori; Miriam Braga; Sara Mondini; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A Meta-analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies Examining the Reliability of Effects on Language Measures.

Authors:  Amy R Price; Harrison McAdams; Murray Grossman; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Author Name; Asif Rahman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Facilitation of Function and Manipulation Knowledge of Tools Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Ryo Ishibashi; Tatsuya Mima; Hidenao Fukuyama; Gorana Pobric
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-04

6.  Baseline Performance Predicts tDCS-Mediated Improvements in Language Symptoms in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Eric M McConathey; Nicole C White; Felix Gervits; Sherry Ash; H Branch Coslett; Murray Grossman; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Limits to tDCS effects in language: Failures to modulate word production in healthy participants with frontal or temporal tDCS.

Authors:  Samuel J Westwood; Andrew Olson; R Chris Miall; Raffaele Nappo; Cristina Romani
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Immediate effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with functional electrical stimulation on activity of the tibialis anterior muscle and balance of individuals with hemiparesis stemming from a stroke.

Authors:  Aline Marina Alves Fruhauf; Fabiano Politti; Simone Dal Corso; Gláucio Carneiro Costa; Amanda da Conceição Teodósio; Soraia Micaela Silva; João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa; Fernanda Ishida Corrêa
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-12-07

9.  Null Effects on Working Memory and Verbal Fluency Tasks When Applying Anodal tDCS to the Inferior Frontal Gyrus of Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Samuel J Westwood; Cristina Romani
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  tDCS Facilitation of Picture Naming: Item-Specific, Task General, or Neither?

Authors:  Joshua S Payne; Marie-Josèphe Tainturier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.