Literature DB >> 23597306

Jejunal morphology and blood metabolites in tail biting, victim and control pigs.

P A Palander1, M Heinonen, I Simpura, S A Edwards, A E Valros.   

Abstract

Tail biting has several identified feeding-related risk factors. Tail biters are often said to be lighter and thinner than other pigs in the pen, possibly because of nutrition-related problems such as reduced feed intake or inability to use nutrients efficiently. This can lead to an increase in foraging behavior and tail biting. In this study, a total of 55 pigs of different ages were selected according to their tail-biting behavior (bouts/hour) and pen-feeding system to form eight experimental groups: tail-biting pigs (TB), victim pigs (V) and control pigs from a tail-biting pen (Ctb) and control pen (Cno) having either free access to feed with limited feeding space or meal feeding from a long trough. After euthanasia, a segment of jejunal cell wall was cut from 50 cm (S50) and 100 cm (S100) posterior to the bile duct. Villus height, crypt depth and villus : crypt ratio (V : C) were measured morphometrically. Blood serum concentration of minerals and plasma concentration of amino acids (AA) was determined. Villus height was greater in Cno than Ctb pigs in the proximal and mid-jejunum (P < 0.05), indicative of better ability to absorb nutrients, and increased with age in the proximal jejunum (P < 0.001). Serum mineral concentration of inorganic phosphate (Pi) and calcium (Ca) was lower in Ctb compared with Cno pigs, and that of Pi in V compared with all the other pigs. Many non-essential AA were lower in pigs from tail-biting pens, and particularly in victim pigs. Free access feeding with shared feeding space was associated with lower levels of essential AA in blood than meal feeding with simultaneous feeding space. Our data suggest that being a pig in a tail-biting pen is associated with decreased jejunal villus height and blood AA levels, possibly because of depressed absorption capacity, feeding behavior or environmental stress associated with tail biting. Victim pigs had lower concentrations of AA and Pi in plasma, possibly as a consequence of being bitten.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597306     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113000669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  8 in total

1.  Antimicrobial peptide KR-32 alleviates Escherichia coli K88-induced fatty acid malabsorption by improving expression of fatty acid transporter protein 4 (FATP4)1.

Authors:  Heyuan Liu; Xiaoxuan Cao; Hong Wang; Jian Zhao; Xinxia Wang; Yizhen Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Maternal and direct genetic parameters for tail length, tail lesions, and growth traits in pigs.

Authors:  Sheila Aikins-Wilson; Mehdi Bohlouli; Sven König
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Save the pig tail.

Authors:  Anna Valros; Mari Heinonen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-04-16

4.  Association Between Tail-Biting and Intestinal Microbiota Composition in Pigs.

Authors:  Nassima Rabhi; Alexandre Thibodeau; Jean-Charles Côté; Nicolas Devillers; Benoit Laplante; Philippe Fravalo; Guillaume Larivière-Gauthier; William P Thériault; Luigi Faucitano; Guy Beauchamp; Sylvain Quessy
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-09

Review 5.  Breeding for disease resilience: opportunities to manage polymicrobial challenge and improve commercial performance in the pig industry.

Authors:  Xuechun Bai; Graham S Plastow
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 6.  The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.

Authors:  Laura A Boyle; Sandra A Edwards; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Françoise Pol; Manja Zupan Šemrov; Sabine Schütze; Janicke Nordgreen; Nadya Bozakova; Evangelia N Sossidou; Anna Valros
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 7.  Omics Application in Animal Science-A Special Emphasis on Stress Response and Damaging Behaviour in Pigs.

Authors:  Claudia Kasper; David Ribeiro; André M de Almeida; Catherine Larzul; Laurence Liaubet; Eduard Murani
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Irish pig farmer's perceptions and experiences of tail and ear biting.

Authors:  Amy Haigh; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2019-12-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.