Literature DB >> 23596540

Malpractice claims for endoscopy.

Lyndon V Hernandez1, Dominic Klyve, Scott E Regenbogen.   

Abstract

AIM: To summarize the magnitude and time trends of endoscopy-related claims and to compare total malpractice indemnity according to specialty and procedure.
METHODS: We obtained data from a comprehensive database of closed claims from a trade association of professional liability insurance carriers, representing over 60% of practicing United States physicians. Total payments by procedure and year were calculated, and were adjusted for inflation (using the Consumer Price Index) to 2008 dollars. Time series analysis was performed to assess changes in the total value of claims for each type of procedure over time.
RESULTS: There were 1901 endoscopy-related closed claims against all providers from 1985 to 2008. The specialties include: internal medicine (n = 766), gastroenterology (n = 562), general surgery (n = 231), general and family practice (n = 101), colorectal surgery (n = 87), other specialties (n = 132), and unknown (n = 22). Colonoscopy represented the highest frequencies of closed claims (n = 788) and the highest total indemnities ($54 093 000). In terms of mean claims payment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ranked the highest ($374  794) per claim. Internists had the highest number of total claims (n = 766) and total claim payment ($70  730  101). Only total claim payments for colonoscopy and ERCP seem to have increased over time. Indeed, there was an average increase of 15.5% per year for colonoscopy and 21.9% per year for ERCP after adjusting for inflation.
CONCLUSION: There appear to be differences in malpractice coverage costs among specialties and the type of endoscopic procedure. There is also evidence for secular trend in total claim payments, with colonoscopy and ERCP costs rising yearly even after adjusting for inflation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Complications; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram; Endoscopy; Medical malpractice

Year:  2013        PMID: 23596540      PMCID: PMC3627840          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  10 in total

1.  Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Todd H Baron; Bret T Petersen; Klaus Mergener; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffinan; Brian C Jacobson; John L Petrini; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Atul A Gawande; Tejal K Gandhi; Allen Kachalia; Catherine Yoon; Ann Louise Puopolo; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Katherine S Rowell; Lynn A Devaney; Suzanne M Sokal; Andrew L Warshaw; William M Abbott; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Medical malpractice: trends in litigation.

Authors:  Tamu K Floyd
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Medical malpractice in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Laurie S Conklin; Catherine Bernstein; Lori Bartholomew; Maria Oliva-Hemker
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Seth Seabury; Darius Lakdawalla; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits; mainly about indications.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  National costs of the medical liability system.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Amitabh Chandra; Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Caprice C Greenberg; David M Studdert; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Fear of the Unseen.

Authors:  Brandon Sprung; Christine Granato; Danielle Marino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Legal hurdles for gastroenterologists in India.

Authors:  Neeraj Nagpal
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-29

3.  Court decisions on medical malpractice.

Authors:  Jan-Paul Knaak; Markus Parzeller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Medical professional liability risk and mitigation: an overview for early-career gastroenterologists.

Authors:  John Azizian; Camellia Dalai; Megan A Adams; James H Tabibian
Journal:  New Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-08

Review 5.  Colonoscopy Quality is the Answer for the Emerging Issue of Interval Cancer.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2014-04-29

6.  Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey.

Authors:  Priscilla A van Riet; Djuna L Cahen; Jan-Werner Poley; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.