Literature DB >> 23596362

Ingestion of magnetic toys: report of serious complications requiring surgical intervention and a proposed management algorithm.

Jerry Tsai1, Donald B Shaul, Roman M Sydorak, Stanley T Lau, Yasir Akmal, Karen Rodriguez.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Increasing popularity of strong magnets as toys has led to their ingestion by children, putting them at risk of potentially harmful gastrointestinal tract injuries.
OBJECTIVES: To heighten physician awareness of the potential complications of magnetic foreign body ingestion, and to provide an updated algorithm for management of a patient who is suspected to have ingested magnets.
DESIGN: A retrospective review of magnet ingestions treated over a two-year period at our institutions in the Southern California Permanente Medical Group. Data including patient demographics, clinical information, radiologic images, and surgical records were used to propose a management strategy.
RESULTS: Five patients, aged 15 months to 18 years, presented with abdominal symptoms after magnet ingestion. Four of the 5 patients suffered serious complications, including bowel necrosis, perforation, fistula formation, and obstruction. All patients were successfully treated with laparoscopic-assisted exploration with or without endoscopy. Total days in the hospital averaged 5.2 days (range = 3 to 9 days). Average time to discharge following surgery was 4 days (range = 2 to 7 days). Ex vivo experimentation with toy magnetic beads were performed to reveal characteristics of the magnetic toys.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should have a heightened sense of caution when treating a patient in whom magnetic foreign body ingestion is suspected, because of the potential gastrointestinal complications. An updated management strategy is proposed that both prevents delays in surgical care and avoids unnecessary surgical exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23596362      PMCID: PMC3627783          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/12-097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  12 in total

1.  Surgical intervention for the ingestion of multiple magnets by children.

Authors:  Masashi Haraguchi; Shigetoshi Matsuo; Hirotaka Tokail; Takashi Azuma; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Sumito Dateki; Kazunari Fukahori; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Magnetic foreign body ingestions leading to duodenocolonic fistula.

Authors:  Steven Liu; Catherine de Blacam; Foong-Yen Lim; Peter Mattei; Petar Mamula
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Multiple foreign body ingestion and ileal perforation.

Authors:  Hirikati S Nagaraj; Indira Sunil
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-09-24       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Revisiting swallowed troubles: intestinal complications caused by two magnets--a case report, review and proposed revision to the algorithm for the management of foreign body ingestion.

Authors:  Viju Vijaysadan; Maria Perez; David Kuo
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  Opposites attract: a case of magnet ingestion.

Authors:  Helen H L Wong; Bruce A Phillips
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.410

6.  Gastrointestinal injuries from magnet ingestion in children--United States, 2003-2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 7.  Pediatric foreign bodies and their management.

Authors:  Marsha Kay; Robert Wyllie
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

8.  Small bowel complication caused by magnetic foreign body ingestion of children: two case reports.

Authors:  Jae Hee Chung; Jeong Soo Kim; Young Tack Song
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Toy magnet ingestion in children: revising the algorithm.

Authors:  James Butterworth; Brad Feltis
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 10.  Multiple magnet ingestion as a source of severe gastrointestinal complications requiring surgical intervention.

Authors:  Sanjeev Dutta; Ario Barzin
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2008-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical report and analysis of 24 cases of multiple magnetic beads foreign body in gastrointestinal tract of children.

Authors:  Xian-Ling Li; Qin-Ming Zhang; Shou-Yan Lu; Ting-Ting Liu; Zi-Ming Yao; Wei-Ping Zhang; Ya-Jun Chen; Long Chen; Fang-Nan Xie
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Takes two to tango.

Authors:  Phanibhushana C Munipalle; Alison Luther; Sarah Blake; Caroline Burt
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-03

3.  Clinical experience in the treatment of children who swallowed multiple magnetic foreign bodies: A report of five cases.

Authors:  Yue-Bin Zhang; Zhi-Gang Gao; Qi-Xing Xiong; Li-Feng Zhang; Dou-Te Cai; Jia-Bin Cai
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Neodymium Magnetic Bead Ingestion in a Toddler.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hui; Vignesh A Arasu; David R Vinson; Dale M Cotton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-04-16

5.  Non-Surgical Management of Gastroduodenal Fistula Caused by Ingested Neodymium Magnets.

Authors:  Claudia Phen; Alexander Wilsey; Emily Swan; Victoria Falconer; Lisa Summers; Michael Wilsey
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2018-10-10

6.  Double Jejunoileal Fistula after Ingestion of Magnets.

Authors:  Konstantinos Zachos; Antonios Panagidis; George Georgiou; Vasileios Alexopoulos; Xenophon Sinopidis
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

7.  Multicenter investigation of pediatric gastrointestinal tract magnets ingestion in China.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Dan Zhang; Xianling Li; Zengmeng Wang; Guangjun Hou; Xinjian Jia; Huizhong Niu; Shiqin Qi; Qingqiang Deng; Bin Jiang; Hongqiang Bian; Heying Yang; Yajun Chen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.