PURPOSE: Research on medication safety in pregnancy often utilizes health plan and birth certificate records. This study discusses methods used to link mothers with infants, a crucial step in such research. METHODS: We describe how eight sites participating in the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program created linkages between deliveries, infants and birth certificates for the 2001-2007 birth cohorts. We describe linkage rates across sites, and for two sites, we compare the characteristics of populations linked using different methods. RESULTS: Of 299,260 deliveries, 256,563 (86%; range by site, 74-99%) could be linked to infants using a deterministic algorithm. At two sites, using birth certificate data to augment mother-infant linkage increased the representation of mothers who were Hispanic or non-White, younger, Medicaid recipients, or had low educational level. A total of 236,460 (92%; range by site, 82-100%) deliveries could be linked to a birth certificate. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored approaches enabled linking most deliveries to infants and to birth certificates, even when data systems differed. The methods used may affect the composition of the population identified. Linkages established with such methods can support sound pharmacoepidemiology studies of maternal drug exposure outside the context of a formal registry.
PURPOSE: Research on medication safety in pregnancy often utilizes health plan and birth certificate records. This study discusses methods used to link mothers with infants, a crucial step in such research. METHODS: We describe how eight sites participating in the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program created linkages between deliveries, infants and birth certificates for the 2001-2007 birth cohorts. We describe linkage rates across sites, and for two sites, we compare the characteristics of populations linked using different methods. RESULTS: Of 299,260 deliveries, 256,563 (86%; range by site, 74-99%) could be linked to infants using a deterministic algorithm. At two sites, using birth certificate data to augment mother-infant linkage increased the representation of mothers who were Hispanic or non-White, younger, Medicaid recipients, or had low educational level. A total of 236,460 (92%; range by site, 82-100%) deliveries could be linked to a birth certificate. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored approaches enabled linking most deliveries to infants and to birth certificates, even when data systems differed. The methods used may affect the composition of the population identified. Linkages established with such methods can support sound pharmacoepidemiology studies of maternal drug exposure outside the context of a formal registry.
Authors: Judith C Maro; Richard Platt; John H Holmes; Brian L Strom; Sean Hennessy; Ross Lazarus; Jeffrey S Brown Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Heather McPhillips; David Loren; Marsha A Raebel; Kimberly Lane; James Livingston; Denise M Boudreau; David H Smith; Robert L Davis; Mary E Willy; Richard Platt Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Marsha A Raebel; Jeffrey Brown; Kimberly Lane; James Livingston; Denise Boudreau; Sharon J Rolnick; Douglas Roblin; David H Smith; Gerald J Dal Pan; Pamela E Scott; Richard Platt Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Jerry H Gurwitz; Robert L Davis; K Arnold Chan; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Kris Fortman; Heather McPhillips; Marsha A Raebel; Douglas Roblin; David H Smith; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Abraham N Morse; Richard Platt Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Robert L Davis; David Rubanowice; Heather McPhillips; Marsha A Raebel; Susan E Andrade; David Smith; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Richard Platt Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Marsha A Raebel; Jeffrey Brown; Kimberly Lane; James Livingston; Denise Boudreau; Sharon J Rolnick; Douglas Roblin; David H Smith; Mary E Willy; Judy A Staffa; Richard Platt Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sarah C MacDonald; Jacqueline M Cohen; Alice Panchaud; Thomas F McElrath; Krista F Huybrechts; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Jason P Sulkowski; Jennifer N Cooper; Anthony Congeni; Erik G Pearson; Benedict C Nwomeh; Edward J Doolin; Martin L Blakely; Peter C Minneci; Katherine J Deans Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Caitlin A Knox; Christian Hampp; Kristin Palmsten; Yanmin Zhu; Soko Setoguchi; Babette Brumback; Richard Segal; Almut G Winterstein Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Chun R Chao; Lawrence H Kushi; Hazel B Nichols; Chris D Baggett; Stephanie M Engel; Darios Getahun; Chelsea Anderson; Nancy T Cannizzaro; Laura Green; Parul Gupta; Cecile A Laurent; Paul C Lin; Clare Meernik; Lisa M Moy; Ethan Wantman; Lanfang Xu; Marilyn L Kwan; Jennifer E Mersereau Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Susan E Andrade; Anick Bérard; Hedvig M E Nordeng; Mollie E Wood; Marleen M H J van Gelder; Sengwee Toh Journal: Curr Epidemiol Rep Date: 2017-04-18