BACKGROUND: In differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients at intermediate risk of recurrences, no evidences are provided regarding the optimal radioactive iodine (RAI) activity to be administered for post-surgical thyroid ablation. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of RAI activities on the outcome of 225 DTC patients classified as intermediate risk, treated with low (1110-1850 MBq) or high RAI activities (≥3700 MBq). RESULTS: Six to 18 months after ablation, remission was observed in 60.0% of patients treated with low and in 60.0% of those treated with high RAI activities, biochemical disease was found in 18.8% of patients treated with low and in 14.3% of patients treated with high RAI activities, metastatic disease was found in 21.2% of patients treated with low and in 25.7% of patients treated with high RAI activities (P=0.56). At the last follow-up (low activities, median 4.2 years; high activities, median 6.9 years), remission was observed in 76.5% of patients treated with low and in 72.1% of patients treated with high RAI activities, persistent disease was observed in 18.8% of patients treated with low and in 23.5% of patients treated with high RAI activities, recurrent disease was 2.4% in patients treated with low and 2.1% in patients treated with high RAI activities, deaths occurred in 2.4% of patients treated with low and in 2.1% of patients treated with high RAI activities (P=0.87). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first evidence that in DTC patients at intermediate risk, high RAI activities at ablation have no major advantage over low activities.
BACKGROUND: In differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients at intermediate risk of recurrences, no evidences are provided regarding the optimal radioactive iodine (RAI) activity to be administered for post-surgical thyroid ablation. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of RAI activities on the outcome of 225 DTC patients classified as intermediate risk, treated with low (1110-1850 MBq) or high RAI activities (≥3700 MBq). RESULTS: Six to 18 months after ablation, remission was observed in 60.0% of patients treated with low and in 60.0% of those treated with high RAI activities, biochemical disease was found in 18.8% of patients treated with low and in 14.3% of patients treated with high RAI activities, metastatic disease was found in 21.2% of patients treated with low and in 25.7% of patients treated with high RAI activities (P=0.56). At the last follow-up (low activities, median 4.2 years; high activities, median 6.9 years), remission was observed in 76.5% of patients treated with low and in 72.1% of patients treated with high RAI activities, persistent disease was observed in 18.8% of patients treated with low and in 23.5% of patients treated with high RAI activities, recurrent disease was 2.4% in patients treated with low and 2.1% in patients treated with high RAI activities, deaths occurred in 2.4% of patients treated with low and in 2.1% of patients treated with high RAI activities (P=0.87). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first evidence that in DTC patients at intermediate risk, high RAI activities at ablation have no major advantage over low activities.
Authors: Jérôme Clerc; Frederik A Verburg; Anca M Avram; Luca Giovanella; Elif Hindié; David Taïeb Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Alberto S Tresoldi; Laura F Sburlati; Marcello Rodari; Mink S Schinkelshoek; Michela Perrino; Simone De Leo; Laura Montefusco; Paolo Colombo; Maura Arosio; Andrea Gerardo Antonio Lania; Laura Fugazzola; Arturo Chiti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: F Pacini; F Basolo; R Bellantone; G Boni; M A Cannizzaro; M De Palma; C Durante; R Elisei; G Fadda; A Frasoldati; L Fugazzola; R Guglielmi; C P Lombardi; P Miccoli; E Papini; G Pellegriti; L Pezzullo; A Pontecorvi; M Salvatori; E Seregni; P Vitti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Ji Min Han; Won Gu Kim; Tae Yong Kim; Min Ji Jeon; Jin-Sook Ryu; Dong Eun Song; Suck Joon Hong; Young Kee Shong; Won Bae Kim Journal: Thyroid Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Nicholas S Andresen; John M Buatti; Hamed H Tewfik; Nitin A Pagedar; Carryn M Anderson; John M Watkins Journal: Eur Thyroid J Date: 2017-03-23