RATIONALE: High-dose levofloxacin (L) (1,000 mg) was as active as moxifloxacin (M) (400 mg) in an early bactericidal activity trial, suggesting these fluoroquinolones could be used interchangeably. Whether pyrazinamide (Z) contributes sterilizing activity beyond the first 2 months in fluoroquinolone-containing second-line regimens remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy of M and high-dose L alone or in combination with ethionamide (Et), amikacin (A), and Z given for 2 or 7 months. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic study was performed to determine the L dose equivalent to 1,000 mg in humans. Treatment started 2 weeks after aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Mice received M or L alone or in combination with 2 months of EtZA followed by 5 months of Et or EtZ. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 2 months of treatment, lung colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were similar in mice receiving either fluoroquinolone alone, but, after 4 and 5 months, CFU counts were 2 log10 lower in mice receiving M. Mice receiving 2MEtZA/3MEt and 2LEtZA/3LEt had 1.0 and 2.7 log10 lung CFUs, respectively. When Z was given throughout, both regimens rendered mice culture negative by 5 months, and most mice did not relapse after 7 months of treatment, with fewer relapses observed in the M group after 6 and 7 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In murine tuberculosis, M had superior efficacy compared with L despite lower serum drug exposures and may remain the fluoroquinolone of choice for second-line regimens. Z contributed substantial sterilizing activity beyond 2 months in fluoroquinolone-containing second-line regimens, largely compensating for L's weaker activity.
RATIONALE: High-dose levofloxacin (L) (1,000 mg) was as active as moxifloxacin (M) (400 mg) in an early bactericidal activity trial, suggesting these fluoroquinolones could be used interchangeably. Whether pyrazinamide (Z) contributes sterilizing activity beyond the first 2 months in fluoroquinolone-containing second-line regimens remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: We compared the efficacy of M and high-dose L alone or in combination with ethionamide (Et), amikacin (A), and Z given for 2 or 7 months. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic study was performed to determine the L dose equivalent to 1,000 mg in humans. Treatment started 2 weeks after aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Mice received M or L alone or in combination with 2 months of EtZA followed by 5 months of Et or EtZ. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 2 months of treatment, lung colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were similar in mice receiving either fluoroquinolone alone, but, after 4 and 5 months, CFU counts were 2 log10 lower in mice receiving M. Mice receiving 2MEtZA/3MEt and 2LEtZA/3LEt had 1.0 and 2.7 log10 lung CFUs, respectively. When Z was given throughout, both regimens rendered mice culture negative by 5 months, and most mice did not relapse after 7 months of treatment, with fewer relapses observed in the M group after 6 and 7 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In murinetuberculosis, M had superior efficacy compared with L despite lower serum drug exposures and may remain the fluoroquinolone of choice for second-line regimens. Z contributed substantial sterilizing activity beyond 2 months in fluoroquinolone-containing second-line regimens, largely compensating for L's weaker activity.
Authors: Ian M Rosenthal; Kathy Williams; Sandeep Tyagi; Andrew A Vernon; Charles A Peloquin; William R Bishai; Jacques H Grosset; Eric L Nuermberger Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: William J Burman; Stefan Goldberg; John L Johnson; Grace Muzanye; Melissa Engle; Ann W Mosher; Shurjeel Choudhri; Charles L Daley; Sonal S Munsiff; Zhen Zhao; Andrew Vernon; Richard E Chaisson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05-04 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Bas C Mourik; Gerjo J de Knegt; Annelies Verbon; Johan W Mouton; Hannelore I Bax; Jurriaan E M de Steenwinkel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Natasha Van't Boveneind-Vrubleuskaya; Tatiana Seuruk; Kai van Hateren; Tridia van der Laan; Jos G W Kosterink; Tjip S van der Werf; Dick van Soolingen; Susan van den Hof; Alena Skrahina; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Devyani Deshpande; Jotam G Pasipanodya; Stellah G Mpagama; Paula Bendet; Shashikant Srivastava; Thearith Koeuth; Pooi S Lee; Sujata M Bhavnani; Paul G Ambrose; Guy Thwaites; Scott K Heysell; Tawanda Gumbo Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Marco Schito; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Helen A Fletcher; Ruth McNerney; Rosella Centis; Lia D'Ambrosio; Matthew Bates; Gibson Kibiki; Nathan Kapata; Tumena Corrah; Jamshed Bomanji; Cris Vilaplana; Daniel Johnson; Peter Mwaba; Markus Maeurer; Alimuddin Zumla Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 9.079