Literature DB >> 23592904

Antitumor effects of electrochemical treatment.

Héctor Manuel Camué Ciria1, Maraelys Morales González, Lisset Ortíz Zamora, Luis Enrique Bergues Cabrales, Gustavo Victoriano Sierra González, Luciana Oliveira de Oliveira, Rodrigo Zanella, Antonio Carlos Buzaid, Orlando Parise, Luciana Macedo Brito, Cesar Augusto Antunes Teixeira, Marina das Neves Gomes, Gleyce Moreno, Venicio Feo da Veiga, Marcos Telló, Carla Holandino.   

Abstract

Electrochemical treatment is an alternative modality for tumor treatment based on the application of a low intensity direct electric current to the tumor tissue through two or more platinum electrodes placed within the tumor zone or in the surrounding areas. This treatment is noted for its great effectiveness, minimal invasiveness and local effect. Several studies have been conducted worldwide to evaluate the antitumoral effect of this therapy. In all these studies a variety of biochemical and physiological responses of tumors to the applied treatment have been obtained. By this reason, researchers have suggested various mechanisms to explain how direct electric current destroys tumor cells. Although, it is generally accepted this treatment induces electrolysis, electroosmosis and electroporation in tumoral tissues. However, action mechanism of this alternative modality on the tumor tissue is not well understood. Although the principle of Electrochemical treatment is simple, a standardized method is not yet available. The mechanism by which Electrochemical treatment affects tumor growth and survival may represent more complex process. The present work analyzes the latest and most important research done on the electrochemical treatment of tumors. We conclude with our point of view about the destruction mechanism features of this alternative therapy. Also, we suggest some mechanisms and strategies from the thermodynamic point of view for this therapy. In the area of Electrochemical treatment of cancer this tool has been exploited very little and much work remains to be done. Electrochemical treatment constitutes a good therapeutic option for patients that have failed the conventional oncology methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct electric current; antitumoral treatment; dissipative structure; electrochemical treatment; tumor; tumor electrolysis; tumor entropy

Year:  2013        PMID: 23592904      PMCID: PMC3626978          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.03.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  54 in total

1.  Evaluation of antitumor efficiency of electrochemical lysis on the model of M-1 sarcoma.

Authors:  A A Mikhailovskaya; M A Kaplan; R A Brodskij; L N Bandurko
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.804

2.  Cellular toxicity induced by different pH levels on the R3230AC rat mammary tumour cell line. An in vitro model for investigation of the tumour destructive properties of electrochemical treatment of tumours.

Authors:  Henrik von Euler; Agneta Söderstedt; Anders Thörne; Jerker M Olsson; Guo Yongqing
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.373

3.  Cellular damage and altered carbohydrate expression in P815 tumor cells induced by direct electric current: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  V F Veiga; C Holandino; M L Rodrigues; M A Capella; S Menezes; C S Alviano
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 4.  Electrochemical treatment of tumours.

Authors:  E Nilsson; H von Euler; J Berendson; A Thörne; P Wersäll; I Näslund; A S Lagerstedt; K Narfström; J M Olsson
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.373

5.  Characterization of the mechanisms of electrochemotherapy in an in vitro model for human cervical cancer.

Authors:  Bujian Tang; Li Li; Zhifeng Jiang; Yingzi Luan; Danrong Li; Wei Zhang; Eddie Reed; Qingdi Q Li
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Electrochemical treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Y Xin; F Xue; B Ge; F Zhao; B Shi; W Zhang
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  Systematic reaction to electrolytic treatment of pig livers in vivo.

Authors:  David Berry; Giuseppe Garcea; Chillton Chong; Eric Silman; Guy Finch; Ashley Dennison; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Electrolytic ablation is as effective as radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of artificial liver metastases in a pig model.

Authors:  Sebastian Hinz; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Ursula Pauser; Clemens Schafmayer; Fred Fändrich; Jürgen Tepel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Effects of in vitro electrical stimulation on enhancement and suppression of malignant lymphoma cell proliferation.

Authors:  M Lyte; J E Gannon; G D O'Clock
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  L-tyrosine-loaded nanoparticles increase the antitumoral activity of direct electric current in a metastatic melanoma cell model.

Authors:  Vânia Emerich Bucco de Campos; Cesar Augusto Antunes Teixeira; Venicio Feo da Veiga; Eduardo Ricci; Carla Holandino
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-11-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Electrical impedance tomography of electrolysis.

Authors:  Arie Meir; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of electrolysis.

Authors:  Arie Meir; Mohammad Hjouj; Liel Rubinsky; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Synergistic Combination of Electrolysis and Electroporation for Tissue Ablation.

Authors:  Michael K Stehling; Enric Guenther; Paul Mikus; Nina Klein; Liel Rubinsky; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reduction of intratumoral brain perfusion by noninvasive transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  G Sprugnoli; L Monti; L Lippa; F Neri; L Mencarelli; G Ruffini; R Salvador; G Oliveri; B Batani; D Momi; A Cerase; A Pascual-Leone; A Rossi; S Rossi; E Santarnecchi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Galvanic current dosage and bacterial concentration are determinants of the bactericidal effect of percutaneous needle electrolysis: an in vitro study.

Authors:  José Antonio García-Vidal; Jesús Salinas; Pilar Escolar-Reina; Francisco Cuello; Nieves Ortega; Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre; Manuel López-Nicolás; Fermín Valera-Garrido; Francesc Medina-Mirapeix
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Electrolytic ablation enables cancer cell targeting through pH modulation.

Authors:  Nicholas R Perkons; Elliot J Stein; Chike Nwaezeapu; Joseph C Wildenberg; Kamiel Saleh; Roni Itkin-Ofer; Daniel Ackerman; Michael C Soulen; Stephen J Hunt; Gregory J Nadolski; Terence P Gade
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-05-17

7.  Incorporation of Reversible Electroporation Into Electrolysis Accelerates Apoptosis for Rat Liver Tissue.

Authors:  Hong Bae Kim; Jong Hoon Chung
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.